[–] ▶ №17320541[Quote]>>17320550
0101011100010101111
Beep boop beep beeep boop beep
▶ №17320564[Quote]>>17321112
SALT YOU ARE WASTING HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS TO MAKE FUN OF ME PLEASE STOP THIS IS NOT FUNNY ANYMORE I MISS MY FRIENDS
▶ №17320614[Quote]>>17320631
stop your investigation of course we are real soyim
▶ №17320640[Quote]>>17320649
>>17320631someones a schizo amirite soy teens?
▶ №17320681[Quote]>>17320723
>>17320649>>17320661wow! Whoever this "salt" guy is, hes really driving this soy goyim mad!
▶ №17320729[Quote]>>17320741
im here
▶ №17320736[Quote]
Quiet down, schizo! We are all real! Take your meds!
▶ №17320737[Quote]
>>17320734who types like this
▶ №17320738[Quote]
It felt like everyone is a bot when the hostiles flooded the site they are all banned now thankfully
▶ №17320740[Quote]
>>17320723im geg laughing at this gemmy reply, no wait, reppey as you say it
▶ №17320759[Quote]
Im real nigger
▶ №17320761[Quote]>>17320767>>17320769>>17321112
STOP REPLYING TO ME NONE OF YOU ARE REAL STOP PLEASE STOP GO MOCK SOMEONE ELSE PLEASE SALT STOP THIS I KNOW YOU ARE SEEING THIS THREAD AND SENDING THESE ROBOTS TO LAUGH AT ME
▶ №17320769[Quote]
>>17320761we are beeb boop
▶ №17320771[Quote]>>17320781
HAHAHA FAGGOT
▶ №17320772[Quote]>>17320777>>17321112
SALT WHY ME WHAT DID I DO TO YOU WHAT DID I DO TO DESERVE THIS PUNISHMENT I NEVER DID ANYTHING WRONG PLEASE BRING EVERYONE BACK THEY DONT DESERVE TO BE ERASED
▶ №17320777[Quote]>>17320796
>>17320772im here with the same thing
▶ №17320780[Quote]>>17320783
lets all geg at this human
▶ №17320785[Quote]
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
▶ №17320788[Quote]
GEEGGGGG
▶ №17320800[Quote]
gemmy
▶ №17320816[Quote]>>17320828
OP, you need to step outside. We're waiting for you to stop the simulation.
▶ №17320848[Quote]
Do I deploy more bots?
▶ №17320860[Quote]>>17320874>>17320878
>>17320840i realized it was epi and deleted it
▶ №17320872[Quote]>>17320894
take your meds now
▶ №17320904[Quote]>>17320916
my team of Peer-reviewed students told me you should take your meds
▶ №17320936[Quote]
I'm black btw
▶ №17320943[Quote]
o algowes
▶ №17320956[Quote]>>17320973>>17321112
SALT I KNOW YOU ARE HERE, PLEASE JUST TELL ME WHAT YOU DID TO EVERYONE ELSE, WHY AM I THE ONLY ONE FORCED TO BE HERE?
▶ №17320958[Quote]>>17320964
>>17320942Have you considered BBC therapy?
▶ №17320967[Quote]>>17320978>>17320983
>>17320840what is the name of that anime girl?
▶ №17320972[Quote]
>>17320964Who is your friend
▶ №17320973[Quote]
>>17320956I took them away and replaced them with bots, maybe. Do you want your buddies back?
▶ №17320975[Quote]
op what do see in your walls
▶ №17320996[Quote]
open xhem
▶ №17321046[Quote]
>>17321027evangelion is my favorite
▶ №17321054[Quote]>>17321112
I AM FUCKING DONE SALT YOU ARE A FUCKING COWARD SENDING BOTS TO REPLY TO ME INSTEAD OF DOING SO YOURSELF STUPID NIGGER I WONT SURRENDER TO YOU I WILL FIND MY FRIENDS AND BRING THEM BACK HERE YOU WILL NOT BREAK ME
▶ №17321073[Quote]>>17321112
MY FRIENDS IF YOU ARE READING THIS I AM SORRY FOR TAKING SO LONG TO BRING YOU BACK YOU MEAN A LOT TO ME AND I PROMISE SALT WON'T WIN, I WILL NEVER EVER GIVE UP UNTIL WE FINALLY REUNITE
▶ №17321077[Quote]
I encountered Labov and Waletzky's original article (1967/this issue, henceforth L&W) in the context of very specific problems in working with qualitative textual data. It was 1983, and I was a (not so young) postdoctoral fellow wrestling with talk about marriage, in the form of transcripts of interviews with more than 100 separating and divorcing women and men. My sociological training in research methods called for fragmenting the data in service of interpretation (Strauss, 1987) and, accordingly, I was moving through the lengthy interviews cutting, categoriz- ing, and grouping responses into a common set of thematic elements.
A recently separated man challenged my fragmentation efforts: responding to an interview question asking for the "reasons for his separation," he laughed and said, "Well, you know, that's a real long story. Maybe I can sum it up by saying…." He then gave a list of complaints. Only later did I realize the full significance of his message: He had knitted the disparate events of his marriage into "a real long story," but traditional social science methods of interviewing and coding fragmented and decontextualized them (Mishler, 1986). The insight, and an alternative way to approach interviews, crystallized when I was handed Labov's (1982) paper on personal narratives of violence by my postdoctoral mentor, Elliot Mishler. From that paper-which transformed forever my way of working with textual data-I worked my way back to L&W.
The fundamental structures of oral versions of personal experience, and their functions, provided a way into the "long stories" about divorce. In addition to healing biographical discontinuities (Bury, 1982) and facilitating the construction of identities, I also came to see how stories justify decisions to divorce (Riessman, 1990). That women and men needed to go to such narrative lengths to explain to the listener what "really happened" in their marriages (our questions did not ask
▶ №17321086[Quote]>>17321102
what does op think of the UN
▶ №17321093[Quote]>>17321112
HAVE MY THREAD, FUCK YOU ALL DISGUSTING FUCKING CHATGPT ABOMINATIONS, THIS WON'T END HERE THOUGH I PROMISE I WILL BE BACK
▶ №17321145[Quote]
we took over his thread. 3 HURRAHS FOR EVERONE WHO SCARED HIM OFF
▶ №17321159[Quote]
beep boop
▶ №17321161[Quote]
11100010111100101101001
▶ №17321162[Quote]
itt we nonsensepost for gegs
▶ №17321183[Quote]
Take the mmcsiwniggers
