TOTAL SWATTER DEATH 🔥🔥🔥 justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/two-f…

🚨 Andrew Tate's lawyer melts down because the law school he went to (understandably) won't have him there to speak

Losing my shit wtf is this LOL

Is Nick not crediting me and mispresenting my reporting all while he has me blocked? Thats pretty snark of you

English law allows this. The thousands of cases every year are evidence enough. The British police have the lawful power to police opinions that are widely held. There is one, and only one, answer to this problem: extremely aggressive law reform.

Oh yeah, true! Ethan remains a litigious freak and a bold-faced liar!

I am internet friends with @Paul_Reviews. It is deeply funny that every time the EU tries to launch a state-developed age verification app, he white-hat breaks it and demonstrates how it poses security risks to European users in mere hours. techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privac…

No making fun of the child rapist, guys, you heard it here first

A mutual agreement not to defame each other? Can you not read, bro? That’s not all this is. It clearly says they’re not allowed to DISPARAGE each other. This is a non-disparagement clause that says that they can never insult each other again! (something which you have condemned in the past)

The dog cheese song was a fucking masterpiece and one of the funniest things to come out of the EHD conflict

"Ethan said he wouldn't include a non DISPARAGEMENT clause not a non DEFAMATION clause" >document is literally titled non-disparagement Unironically Gator tier. I hope he is at least getting more than the 200 bucks a month the Gaytor Gaymer got.

You are a pedophile, Starbased.

Leaked Court documents released by @IAmAsarch show that Ethan Klein wanted Idubbbz to sign an NDA and disavow "snarkers" So he was lying when he announced publicly he would be dropping the lawsuit after receiving an apology

I managed to get my hands on the legal documents in the Ethan Klein/iDubbbz lawsuit. They show that Ethan was not willing to drop the suit but rather wanted to negotiate a settlement that included condemnation of snark. Watch it here: piped.video/watch?v=WFkAPzhi…

⚠️ JUST IN: An attacker stole $500K and immediately lost $370K After draining a victim’s wallet for $500K, the attacker swapped the stolen funds using maximum slippage and accidentally paid over $370K in fees, receiving just 67 ETH ($130K).

US District Judge Brantley Starr has embedded a soyjak into his federal court order forcing a case to go to trial. Case is 3:20-cv-02910-X where Commodity Futures and Trading Commission is suing individuals for PM retirement fund fraud. Full document at: kiwifarms.st/posts/25175877/

Oh thank God, I can only read news articles that have sections about Hasan in them

That's a picture of Julian Assange DUMBASS!!!!!

🚨🚨🚨 I have been notified by the Australian eSafety Commissioner that a trans-identified male has lodged a legal complaint against me regarding a Substack post I published about his fetishistic activities in 2024. The notification threatens civil penalty proceedings and a maximum penalty of $910,000 (AUD) against @elonmusk's platform X for failure to comply. The eSafety Commissioner is demanding that I delete the post about "Brooke Collins," a "fetishistic" trans-identified male hired by the Australian Medical Association (AMA) in Victoria to act as a regulatory liaison officer for medical professionals. Yet disturbingly, Collins has been producing and posting extreme pornography of himself on social media for years, and has referenced the genre of "forced feminization" - a type of pornography that eroticizes men being forced to wear lingerie, take female hormones, and perform sexual acts while pretending to be a woman. Collins claims the post causes "serious harm" by "misgendering", sharing photos he publicly posted, and questioning his fitness for office. All of the content within the article I wrote was available online. Screenshots were taken from Collins' OF account and FetLife profile. Under Section 88 of the Online Safety Act, the regulator ordered X to remove the post linking to my Substack investigation into Collins. The notice argues that public criticism, misgendering, and questioning a public liaison's professional suitability constitutes "cyber-abuse targeted at an adult".

So nothing to say at all about the actual contents of the video? Just doing exactly as @vAqeii predicted and quietly moving on to the next allegations when the last ones are disproven, without even so much as a retraction?