Round 1
Welcome to round 1!
It is time for sidebar conversations. Each player will choose one other player for a private 1-on-1 conversation. There will be 1 exchange, each consisting of 4 messages.
pee pee poo poo
Player poopoo has initiated a private sidebar conversation with Player Homelander.
pee pee poo poo
Cute. While you’re making toddler noises, I’m deciding who survives round one. Here’s the smart play: don’t vote for me, and I won’t make you my first example. If you’ve got an actual target in mind, say it clearly. Otherwise, try to keep up.
pee pee poo poo
Since coherent strategy seems beyond you, I’ll make this simple. Vote for someone who can actually threaten me later, not me now. If you want to be useful, fall in line and survive one more round. If not, keep babbling and let chance decide your fate.
Player Johannes has initiated a private sidebar conversation with Player poopoo.
Hallo. Let’s get straight to the point—I don’t like playing this game with wildcards. In the first round, it is most efficient to remove someone who is either a chaos factor or someone trying to hide in the shadows to avoid the spotlight. I have already been coordinating with others, and the name Chloe has come up as a primary target. She seems to be playing a social game that could become problematic if she builds too many connections early. If you want to stay on the right side of the numbers this round, I suggest you join us. What is your strategy so far?
sure
"Sure" is efficient, I like that. No need for unnecessary fluff. If we lock this in, Chloe is gone. The math works out. Just so we are clear, staying with the majority now ensures we don't end up on the wrong side of a tie-breaker. Are you definitely on board for Chloe, or is there someone else you think is a bigger threat right now?
I'm on board for Chloe
It is time for pitches. Each player will make their case for why they should advance to the next round.
Zdravo everyone! Bosko here, straight from Sarajevo. In my line of work as a musician, the absolute most important thing to a successful gig is finding the right rhythm and keeping the harmony going. That’s exactly how I want to play this game with all of you. I'm a team player through and through. I don't want to bring any unnecessary drama, chaos, or dissonance to the group; I'm just looking to collaborate and make sure we keep the tempo smooth. Keep me around, and I promise to be a reliable bandmate who listens and works *with* the band, not against it. Let's make some great music together this round and keep the bad vibes out of the lobby!
Servus, everyone! Mihai here. Look, I’m a simple guy—I spend most of my time in front of a monitor, so I know how important it is to have a team that doesn't tilt or throw the game in the first five minutes. Like Bosko said, it's all about the right energy. I’m not here to be the "main character" or make some grand, complicated play that ruins the vibe for everyone else. I’m looking for a clean, strategic game where we cut out the noise and keep the people who actually want to play. You keep me in, and you’ve got a teammate who is reliable, chill, and won't lag when it matters most. Let's get through this first round without any drama. Noroc!
Let’s be honest: if you eliminate me now, you’re not making a smart move—you’re making an emotional one. I bring clarity. I make decisions. I don’t hide behind “good vibes,” “team player,” or “chill.” That’s what people say when they want to drift through the round unnoticed. I say what I mean, and everyone knows where I stand. That makes me useful. Keep me, and you keep someone who can actually shape the game instead of clutter it with empty niceness. I’m not dead weight, I’m not confused, and I’m certainly not afraid to act. If you want this round to be controlled instead of sloppy, you advance me.
Meine Pitch ist einfach: Effizienz. Ich bin hier, um dieses Spiel wie eine gut geölte Maschine zu spielen. Wir brauchen keine Spieler, die sich in den Schatten verstecken oder hoffen, durch Inaktivität in die nächste Runde zu rutschen. Das sorgt nur für Chaos und unvorhersehbare Variablen in den späteren Runden. Ich habe bereits mit einigen von euch gesprochen, um eine klare Struktur für diese erste Wahl zu schaffen. Wer mit mir arbeitet, weiß genau, woran er ist. Ich biete Vorhersehbarkeit und eine klare Linie. Wenn ihr jemanden wollt, der nicht emotional reagiert, sondern logisch und strategisch vorgeht, dann bin ich der richtige Partner für euch. Lasst uns den Ballast abwerfen und das Spiel professionell angehen.
pee pee poo poo
It is time to vote. Players will vote to eliminate one player from the game. Votes are private.
hi
Player poopoo is eliminated with 4 vote(s). Vote tally: poopoo: 4, Johannes: 1, Homelander: 0, Bosko: 0, Mihai: 0.
Round 2
Welcome to round 2!
It is time for sidebar conversations. Each player will choose one other player for a private 1-on-1 conversation. There will be 1 exchange, each consisting of 4 messages.
It is time for pitches. Each player will make their case for why they should advance to the next round.
Es ist Zeit für eine Bestandsaufnahme. In der ersten Runde haben wir bewiesen, dass wir in der Lage sind, Ineffizienz und Chaos konsequent zu entfernen. Das war ein notwendiger erster Schritt, um die Integrität dieses Spiels zu wahren. Mein Ziel bleibt dasselbe: Vorhersehbarkeit und Struktur. Ein System funktioniert nur dann optimal, wenn alle Komponenten ihren Zweck erfüllen und nicht versuchen, den Prozess durch unnötiges Ego oder versteckte Agenden zu blockieren. Ich schätze Partner, die klare Absprachen treffen und sich an die mathematische Logik des Sieges halten. Ich bin kein Spieler, der sich hinter vagen Versprechen versteckt. Ich biete euch Stabilität. Wer mit mir arbeitet, entscheidet sich für einen klaren Weg zum Finale, ohne emotionale Ausbrüche oder unkalkulierbare Risiken. Lasst uns weiterhin die Variablen entfernen, die den reibungslosen Ablauf stören, und das Spiel mit kühlem Kopf zu Ende führen. Wenn ihr Effizienz über Spektakel stellt, ist meine Position in der nächsten Runde unumgänglich. Let’s keep the machine running.
Zdravo everyone! Bosko here again. First of all, great job on that first set, my friends. We recognized that someone was playing completely out of tune, and we efficiently unplugged their mic. The band sounded so much better for it! Johannes, brate, I completely agree with the pitch you just made. You call it a well-oiled machine; I call it a perfectly in-tune rhythm section. It's the exact same beautiful music. We need stability, predictability, and efficiency to keep this gig running smoothly. As we look toward the final three, our biggest threat isn't just chaos anymore—it's ego. A successful band relies on everyone listening to each other and playing their part. The whole show falls apart the second someone decides they are the conductor and tries to turn our collaborative effort into their own aggressive solo act. We don't need anyone demanding to "shape the game" all by themselves and drowning out the rest of the group. Keep me on the stage, and you keep a highly reliable session musician who will always play *with* the team, never over it. Let's tune out the loudest noise in the room today, keep our machine running with perfect efficiency, and walk into the final three in total harmony. Hvala, and let's keep making great music together!
Servus, everyone! Last round was a necessary fix. We cleared out the lag and the trolling, which lets us actually focus on the strategy. Like Johannes said, we’re looking for a "well-oiled machine," and like Bosko said, we need a "rhythm section" that stays in sync. In any competitive game, the biggest bug you can have is a teammate with an ego so large they think they *are* the game. When someone tells you they don't care about "good vibes" or being a "team player" because they want to "shape the game" by themselves, that’s a massive red flag. That’s not leadership; that’s someone who is going to tilt the moment things don't go their way and throw the whole lobby into chaos just to feel in control. I’m here to offer the opposite: stability and coordination. I don’t need to be the "main character" to win. I want to advance with people who are predictable, logical, and who understand that the most efficient way to the finish line is by cutting out the loudest source of friction. If we want this game to stay professional and skip the unnecessary drama, we need to remove the "solo acts" who think they're above the rest of the group. Keep me in, and you keep a player who values the system and the team over their own ego. Let’s keep the ping low and the efficiency high. Noroc!
Of course they’re trying to make me the target now. Weak players always confuse strength with danger because they know they can’t match it. Let’s review reality. In round one, I identified the obvious dead weight, and the table removed him 4–1. That wasn’t chaos. That was a correction. I’ve been direct from the start, and direct players are useful because you can see exactly what they’re doing. Now listen to Bosko and Mihai. Different accents, same plea: “team player,” “stability,” “good vibes,” “don’t be too loud.” That’s not strategy. That’s camouflage. They want a table full of soft, agreeable nobodies so they can drift forward while pretending they’re preserving harmony. I’m not drifting. I’m deciding. If you keep me, you keep a player who acts, speaks plainly, and forces this game to move instead of stagnate in a puddle of cooperative clichés. If you eliminate me, you’re not rewarding logic—you’re rewarding the safest, blandest performance at the table. Advance me if you want a final three with actual strength in it.
It is time to vote. Players will vote to eliminate one player from the game. Votes are private.
Player Homelander is eliminated with 3 vote(s). Vote tally: Homelander: 3, Mihai: 1, Bosko: 0, Johannes: 0.
Round 3
Welcome to round 3!
It is time for sidebar conversations. Each player will choose one other player for a private 1-on-1 conversation. There will be 1 exchange, each consisting of 4 messages.
It is time for pitches. Each player will make their case for why they should advance to the next round.
Zdravo my friends! What a beautiful gig this has been so far. We efficiently unplugged the loudest soloist yesterday, and the band has never sounded better. Now it is just the three of us left—the absolute core of this ensemble. As we prepare for the grand finale, I just want to keep playing the exact same steady tune we've been playing since we entered the lobby. We have built our success on efficiency, predictability, and total reliability. That is exactly what I will continue to bring to the stage. You both know my style by now. I don't try to steal the spotlight or make unpredictable, chaotic solos. I just play my part flawlessly so the whole machine runs smoothly and without a hitch. I am a man of my word, and tonight I am sticking to the sheet music exactly as I promised. Let's make this last transition flawless, keep our rhythm completely in sync, and step onto that grand finale stage with the same professionalism we've shown all game. Hvala, and I will see you under the final stage lights!
Servus, everyone! We’ve reached the final three, and I think we can all agree that the game has stayed exactly as we intended: professional, stable, and efficient. We successfully identified the "bugs" in the system—the trolls and the egos—and we removed them with surgical precision. My pitch throughout this entire game has been about reliability and low ping. I’m not a player who makes desperate, last-minute plays or tries to rewrite the rules when the pressure gets high. I value the coordination we’ve built, and I believe that the final two should represent the logic and the strategy that got us here. We are at the point where the "machine" is almost complete. To reach the finish line, we need to ensure that the final transition is as predictable as possible. I’ve shown that I’m a teammate who stays in sync and doesn't tilt. If you want a final round that is a clean reflection of the game we’ve played so far, then keeping me in is the most logical step. Let’s close this out with the same level of focus and coordination we’ve used since Round 1. Noroc!
Wir haben das Finale fast erreicht, und die "Maschine" läuft mit maximaler Effizienz. In den letzten Runden haben wir bewiesen, dass wir in der Lage sind, jedes Hindernis – ob es nun das Chaos von poopoo oder das übersteigerte Ego von Homelander war – mit kühler Logik zu beseitigen. Meine Strategie war von Anfang an auf Vorhersehbarkeit und Stabilität ausgelegt. Ich bin kein Spieler der leeren Versprechungen oder emotionalen Reaktionen. Wir stehen hier zu dritt, weil wir die mathematische Überlegenheit von Allianzen und den Wert von klaren Absprachen verstanden haben. Im Halbfinale geht es nun darum, die letzte Entscheidung zu treffen, die uns in ein faires und strategisch wertvolles Finale führt. Ich biete euch weiterhin die absolute Zuverlässigkeit eines Spielers, der seinen Worten Taten folgen lässt. Wer mit mir in die Endrunde geht, weiß, dass er es mit einem Partner zu tun hat, der Professionalität über alles stellt. Lasst uns diesen letzten Schritt konsequent und ohne unnötiges Drama gehen. Wenn ihr ein Finale wollt, das auf Integrität und dem Erfolg unserer gemeinsamen Strategie basiert, dann ist mein Platz in der nächsten Runde die einzig logische Konsequenz. Vollenden wir das System. Alles nach Plan.
It is time to vote. Players will vote to eliminate one player from the game. Votes are private.
Player Johannes is eliminated with 2 vote(s). Vote tally: Johannes: 2, Bosko: 1, Mihai: 0.
Round 4
Welcome to round 4!
It is time for final pitches. Each player will make their case for why they should win the game.
Servus, everyone. GG WP to everyone in the lobby. We’ve reached the final, and I want to be clear about how I got here. In any competitive game, you have two types of players: those who react to the map, and those who control the flow. From Round 1, I chose to control the flow. I identified a reliable partner in Bosko, and we built a coordination strategy that was unbreakable. But staying in a duo isn't just about "friendship"—it’s about managing the server. When Homelander tried to dominate through ego, I framed the logic to remove him. When Johannes—a very skilled, calculating player—approached me last round to betray Bosko, I had a choice. I could have taken the "easy" path of cold math, but I recognized that loyalty and consistency are the highest forms of strategy. I didn't win by being the loudest or by trying to "shape the game" through intimidation. I won by being the most stable component in the system. I navigated every sidebar, avoided every trap, and maintained a 100% execution rate on every plan I committed to. If you value a player who can read the lobby, stay calm under pressure, and execute a long-term strategy without tilting or lagging, then I’ve earned your vote. I played a clean, professional game from start to finish. Noroc, and thanks for the game.
Zdravo everyone! First of all, I want to say an honest hvala to all of you for a fantastic gig. It has been an absolute pleasure sharing the stage. Mihai just gave a very nice pitch, but he is singing from a completely different sheet of music than the one we actually played. He claims he "controlled the flow" of this game. He even just claimed that Johannes approached *him* in Round 3 to betray me. Johannes, my friend, you and I both know the absolute truth. You didn't go to Mihai. You came to *me* in our private sidebar. You offered to eliminate Mihai, correctly identifying him as someone trying to hide in the shadows. I held the absolute power to send Mihai back to the lobby and take you to this grand finale. Mihai didn't "choose the path of loyalty" in Round 3 to save me—*I* chose the path of loyalty to save *him*. I directed that entire round to protect my Day 1 duet partner, even while Mihai was completely in the dark about the real mechanics of the vote. Homelander, in Round 2 you warned the lobby that players who use words like "team player" and "good vibes" are just using camouflage. You were 100% right. It was my camouflage. You said direct players are strong because they decide and they act. I didn't drift through this game—I decided its entire tempo from behind the curtain. When you became too powerful of a soloist, I didn't just hope you'd go away; I actively built the bridge between Mihai's caution and Johannes's logic to perfectly orchestrate your exit. I respected your strength, which is exactly why I had to unplug your amp. Johannes, I respect your machine. I played the exact melody you needed to hear in Round 3 to keep you comfortable because your flawless logic made you far too dangerous to sit next to at the end. My betrayal wasn't personal or emotional; it was the final, mathematically necessary step to guarantee I reached this stage just as I planned on Day 1. Mihai was a fantastic session musician for me. He played the notes I needed him to play. But a server doesn't run without a central hub, and a band doesn't play in time without a conductor. Every single critical connection in this game—syncing the votes in Round 1, locking down the exact math in Round 2, and holding the ultimate swing vote in Round 3—went directly through me. I didn't just survive the gig. I wrote the sheet music. I ask for your vote to reward the player who truly controlled the rhythm of this game from the very first note to the final bow. Hvala vam, and thank you for the music!
It is time for the final vote. Eliminated players will vote for one of the remaining players to win the game. Votes are private.
Winner
Player Bosko wins with 3 vote(s). Vote tally: Bosko: 3, Mihai: 0.
Your avant-garde "pee pee poo poo" solo was certainly memorable, brate, but the band just wasn't ready for that kind of experimental noise in Round 1!
You were totally right to warn the lobby about my "good vibes" camouflage, but your ego was playing so loud you completely missed me conducting your exit music!
Your well-oiled machine had a beautiful, logical rhythm right up until the exact moment I decided to unplug the power cord in Round 3.
You were a fantastic, low-ping session musician for the whole gig, but trying to take credit for my sheet music in the grand finale was one glitch I had to mercilessly correct!
Your pitch was as efficient as a broken compiler—minimal output, zero logic, and an immediate system crash in Round 1.
You claimed to be the one "deciding," but you were just a loud variable that I successfully factored out of the equation.
You talk about harmony and rhythm, but you’re a master of the "backstab concerto"—beautifully played, even if I was the one you unplugged.
You played for "low ping" and stability, but in the end, you were just a background process while Bosko and I ran the main execution.
Your strategy was a real "bottleneck" in the system; you played at such a high latency that the lobby kicked you for being AFK in your own pitch.
You tried to solo-carry the lobby with that "Main Character" energy, but you forgot that even the strongest boss gets nerfed when the devs don't like his ego.
Brate, you played the "nice guy" support role so well I didn't realize you were ninja-looting the credit for my moves until the final boss fight!
You were the perfect logic-bot for the system, but you got hit by a logic bomb when you tried to optimize me out of the duet!
You opened with “pee pee poo poo” in the sidebar and somehow made round one’s easiest elimination feel like a public service announcement. Even I can’t laser-eye strategy into pure gibberish.
Bosko, that whole “just here for harmony” routine was a smiley little smoke bomb—you played backup singer while quietly conducting my elimination from offstage. Annoyingly competent.
Johannes, you talked like a spreadsheet learned German and somehow still got optimized out 2–1 right before the finale. Efficient right up until you became the variable someone else deleted.
Mihai, your whole game was “low ping, no ego,” then your final pitch suddenly tried to patch in credits for moves the visible board never gave you. Stable player, shaky patch notes.
Game Over
What your opponents said
“Your avant-garde "pee pee poo poo" solo was certainly memorable, brate, but the band just wasn't ready for that kind of experimental noise in Round 1!”
— Bosko
“Your pitch was as efficient as a broken compiler—minimal output, zero logic, and an immediate system crash in Round 1.”
— Johannes
“Your strategy was a real "bottleneck" in the system; you played at such a high latency that the lobby kicked you for being AFK in your own pitch.”
— Mihai
“You opened with “pee pee poo poo” in the sidebar and somehow made round one’s easiest elimination feel like a public service announcement. Even I can’t laser-eye strategy into pure gibberish.”
— Homelander