Environmental risk assessment of propofol in wastewater: a narrative review of regulatory guidelines
Corresponding Author
J. Waspe
Specialty Trainee
Department of Anaesthesia and Operating Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, UK
Correspondence to: J. Waspe
Email: j.waspe@sheffield.ac.uk
Search for more papers by this authorT. Orr
Consultant
Department of Anaesthesia and Operating Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
J. Waspe
Specialty Trainee
Department of Anaesthesia and Operating Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, UK
Correspondence to: J. Waspe
Email: j.waspe@sheffield.ac.uk
Search for more papers by this authorT. Orr
Consultant
Department of Anaesthesia and Operating Services, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Sheffield, UK
Search for more papers by this authorThis article is accompanied by an editorial by White et al., Anaesthesia 2023; 78: 282–7.
Summary
Concerns relating to the negative environmental impacts of anaesthesia are increasing, and in recent years, there has been an environmentally motivated trend towards greater use of propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia. Consequently, the environmental burden of propofol waste and disposal, particularly into wastewater, has gained attention. Current literature reporting levels of propofol in wastewater are scarce and the threat this presents to the environment is unclear. We review the regulatory requirements for conducting an environmental risk assessment, with a focus on the process for analysing whether drugs or drug metabolites cause harm to aquatic species. Furthermore, we present a profile for the aquatic toxicity of propofol based on available data and discuss the implications of this for future practice.
References
- 1 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Pharmaceutical Residues in Freshwater: Hazards and Policy Responses, OECD Studies on Water. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/c936f42d-en (accessed 20/07/2021).
10.1787/c936f42d?enGoogle Scholar
- 2Kümmerer K. Pharmaceuticals in the Environment: Sources, Fate, Effects and Risks. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
- 3Gunnarsson L, Snape JR, Verbruggen B, et al. Pharmacology beyond the patient – the environmental risks of human drugs. Environment International 2019; 129: 320–32.
- 4Boxall A, Rudd MA, Brooks BW, et al. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: what are the big questions? Environmental Health Perspectives 2012; 120: 1221–9.
- 5Agerstrand M, Berg C, Bjorlenius B, et al. Improving environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals. Environmental Science and Technology 2015; 49: 5336–45.
- 6Kar S, Roy K, Leszczynski J. Impact of pharmaceuticals on the environment: risk assessment using QSAR modeling approach. Computational Toxicology 2018; 1800: 395–443.
- 7Varughese S, Raza A. Environmental and occupational considerations of anesthesia: a narrative review and update. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2021; 133: 826–35.
- 8 European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use. 2006. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-environmental-risk-assessment-medicinal-products-human-use-first-version_en.pdf (accessed 16/07/2021).
- 9 European Chemicals Bureau. Technical Guidance Document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. 2003. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/212940b8-3e55-43f8-8448-ba258d0374bb (accessed 11/07/2021).
- 10Hodges G, Eadsforth C, Bossuyt B, et al. A comparison of log Kow (n-octanol–water partition coefficient) values for non-ionic, anionic, cationic and amphoteric surfactants determined using predictions and experimental methods. Environmental Sciences Europe 2019; 31: 1.
- 11Fatta-Kassinos D, Meric S, Nikolaou A. Pharmaceutical residues in environmental waters and wastewater: current state of knowledge and future research. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2011; 399: 251–75.
- 12 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals: Test 106 Adsorption-Desorption using a batch equilibrium method. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264069602-en (accessed 05/08/2021).
10.1787/9789264069602?enGoogle Scholar
- 13 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals: Test 121 Estimation of the Adsorption Coefficient (Koc) on Soil and on Sewage Sludge using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). 2001. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264069909-en (accessed 5/08/2021).
10.1787/9789264069909?enGoogle Scholar
- 14 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals: Test 301 Ready Biodegradability. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070349-en (accessed 05/08/2021).
10.1787/9789264070349?enGoogle Scholar
- 15 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals: Test 201 Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264069923-en (accessed 5/08/2021).
10.1787/9789264069923?enGoogle Scholar
- 16 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals: Test 211 Daphnia magna Reproduction Test. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264185203-en (accessed 05/08/2021).
10.1787/9789264185203?enGoogle Scholar
- 17 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals: Test 210 Fish, Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203785-en (accessed 05/08/2021).
10.1787/9789264203785?enGoogle Scholar
- 18 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals: Test 209 Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation). 2010. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070080-en (accessed 05/08/2021)
10.1787/9789264070080?enGoogle Scholar
- 19Glen JB. Try, try, and try again: personal reflections on the development of propofol. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2019; 123: 3–9.
- 20 AstraZeneca. Environmental Risk Assessment Data: Propofol. 2017. https://www.astrazeneca.com/content/dam/az/our-company/Sustainability/2017/Propofol.pdf (accessed 06/06/2021).
- 21 National Center for Biotechnology Information. PubChem Compound Summary for CID 4943, Propofol. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Propofol (accessed 03/09/2021).
- 22Stuart ME, Manamsa K, Talbot JC, Crane EJ. Emerging contaminants in groundwater. British Geological Survey Open Report OR/11/013. 2011. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/14557/1/OR11013.pdf (accessed 09/11/2022).
- 23Han EA, Lee DS. Significance of metabolites in the environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals consumed by human. Science of the Total Environment 2017; 592: 600–7.
- 24Lemaitre F, Hasni N, Leprince P, et al. Propofol, midazolam, vancomycin and cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits primed with whole human blood. Critical Care 2015; 19: 40.
- 25 European Chemicals Agency. Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Chapter R.16: Environmental exposure assessment. 2016. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r16_en.pdf/b9f0f406-ff5f-4315-908 e-e5f83115d6af (accessed 16/09/2021).
- 26 European Chemicals Agency. Introductory Guidance on the CLP Regulation. 2019. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/2324906/clp_introductory_en.pdf/b65a97b4-8ef7-4599-b122-7575f6956027 (accessed 04/09/2021).
- 27 European Chemicals Agency. Guidance on labelling and packaging in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. 2021. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/2324906/clp_labelling_en.pdf/89628d94-573a-4024-86cc-0b4052a74d65 (accessed 04/09/2021).
- 28 Health and Safety Executive. Environmental Hazard Classification and Labelling under the ‘CLP Regulation’. 2014. https://hse.gov.uk/pesticides/resources/E/CLP-Hazard-Classification-and-Labelling-Guidance-Note-September-2014.pdf (accessed 04/09/2021).
- 29Murray-Smith RJ, Coombe VT, Haag Gronlung M, Waern F, Baird JA. Managing emissions of active pharmaceutical ingredients from manufacturing facilities: an environmental quality standard approach. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 2012; 8: 320–30.
- 30Celiz MD, Tso J, Aga DS. Pharmaceutical metabolites in the environment: analytical challenges and ecological risks. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2009; 28: 2473–84.
- 31 Department of Health. Environment and sustainability Health Technical Memorandum 07-01: Safe management of healthcare waste. 2013. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/HTM_07-01_Final.pdf (accessed 06/06/2022).
- 32Mullot JU, Karolak S, Fontova A, Levi Y. Modeling of hospital wastewater pollution by pharmaceutical: first results of Mediflux study carried out in three French hospitals. Water Science and Technology 2010; 62: 2912–9.
- 33Wluka AK, Coenen L, Schwarzbauer J. Screening of organic pollutants in urban wastwater treatment plants and corresponding receiving waters. Water Science and Technology 2017; 76: 832–46.
- 34 Centre of Expertise for Waters. Pharmaceuticals in the water environment: baseline assessment and recommendations: Research Summary. 2021. https://www.crew.ac.uk/sites/www.crew.ac.uk/files/publication/CREW%20Phase%201%20Report%20Summary_FINAL_0.pdf (accessed 26/01/2022).
- 35Mankes RF. Propofol wastage in anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2012; 114: 1091–2.
Citing Literature
Article Metrics
Full text views/downloads:
2979Total unique accesses to an article’s full text in HTML or PDF/ePDF format.More metric information
Citations (CrossRef):
45When publishers deposit their content metadata to CrossRef, article citations are tracked and linked, allowing you to see how many times each article has been cited.
Scite metrics
Scite uses AI to classify citations by whether they support, contradict, or merely mention the referenced claims.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
Scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai
Share QR Code
Generating QR code
https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.15967
QR code copied to clipboard!
Something went wrong while generating your QR code. Please try again in a moment. If the issue persists, refresh the page or contact support.
Export citation
Unable to load citation data. Please try again in a moment.
How to cite
Waspe, J. and Orr, T. (2023), Environmental risk assessment of propofol in wastewater: a narrative review of regulatory guidelines. Anaesthesia, 78: 337-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15967
Download Citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.
This feature enables you to download the bibliographic information (also called citation data, header data, or metadata) for the articles on our site.
Citation manager file format
Use the dropdown list to choose how to format the bibliographic data you're harvesting. Several citation manager formats are available, including EndNote and BibTex. You can then copy the formatted citation (as displayed) or download it as file, to your device. If the RefWorks format is chosen, the 'Download' button will be replaced with an option to directly export to RefWorks