Free Speech Union renews bid to reshape InternetNZ; says it opposes ‘wokester rule’
The Free Speech Union is attempting to increase its influence over InternetNZ, the non-profit society that administers the “.nz” internet domain, after its then-chief executive Jonathan Ayling was elected to its board last year.
The lobby group is seeking to have its current chief executive, Jillaine Heather, and defence barrister Douglas Brow also elected to InternetNZ’s board after previously encouraging its supporters to join InternetNZ, en masse, so they could vote in its elections and on its motions.
In a call to action, Free Speech Union chairperson Stephen Franks said its supporters had an opportunity to “vote against wokester rule” and suggested InternetNZ was charging more than it needed for “.nz” registrations while “siphoning off revenue to matey cause groups in Wellington”.
The Free Speech Union failed in its bid last year to secure enough votes to elect a second nominee or to change InternetNZ’s constitution, after thousands of people opposed to its agenda also signed up as new members.
Read more:
InternetNZ’s membership has swelled to 4800, from about 280 before the Free Speech Union concerned itself with the organisation last year, as both supporters and opponents of the lobby group joined to influence its votes.
One of the constitutional changes the Free Speech Union had been seeking last year would have removed a reference to the society’s commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
A jubilant observer said at the time that the Free Speech Union had been “spanked”, with another saying “a glorious gathering of nerds” had come together to “decisively vote down all the stupid FSU motions”.
The Free Speech Union’s fresh bid to elect supporters to InternetNZ’s board appears to have been prompted by concerns InternetNZ might change its membership rules to reduce the lobby group’s influence.
In a message to supporters, Franks drew attention to minutes of an InternetNZ board meeting that referred to a Government review of cybersecurity.
InternetNZ’s board said the review might “necessitate a future review of membership numbers and types to provide the Government with assurance that the membership has a commitment to the work of InternetNZ, that the organisation is stable and that the board has appropriate skills and diversity”.
Franks appeared sceptical. “Who in government is seeking that assurance? What part of government? Officials, or politicians? For what purpose?”, he said in his message to supporters, questioning whether it was “really the incumbent board that wants to purge the membership”.
Voting on the society’s board vacancies opened on July 24 and closes on Monday.
Communications Minister Paul Goldsmith told The Post he did not have concerns about the stability of InternetNZ and its membership base.
The issues were for InternetNZ to work out, he said. “I’ll work with them as best I can.”
InternetNZ chairperson Stephen Judd said the government review did not directly raise any questions about the stability of InternetNZ, but had referred to the Domain Name System and expressed a general interest in the governance of organisations that had a bearing on cybersecurity.
No motions on its membership structure were planned for its annual meeting on August 13, he said.
The tensions with the Free Speech Union were not within InternetNZ’s control, Judd said.
“If people look at what has actually happened in terms of the running of our registry and what the organisation actually does in terms of rules and so forth, they would see nothing of concern has happened.
“If we continue to provide really good registry services at a high quality then I think, over time, that will be the solution,” he said.
Our comment section is a safe, constructive place for you to discuss stories and issues that matter to you. We ask users not to:
To post a comment, create a Stuff account, then type into the box below and hit submit.
Comments that are identified as potentially breaching our terms and conditions may be held back for additional review. See our full terms and conditions here to ensure your comments are good to go.
You can report comments by using the report function on published comments.
Stories will automatically close for comments after 24 hours.
We may contact you via email to follow up on your comment for editorial purposes. If you have a question about this platform, email comments@stuffdigital.co.nz.
Comments have been closed on this story.