TE UPOKO O TE IKA

Editorial
Politics
Business
Auckland
Capital
Lifestyle
Sport
Sunday Star-Times
Puzzles
Editorial
Politics
Business
Auckland
Capital
Lifestyle
Sport
Sunday Star-Times
Puzzles

News

  • NZ news
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sport
  • World
  • Rural

Living

  • Life
  • Homed
  • Culture
  • Travel
  • Food & drink
  • Style
  • Wellbeing

Extras

  • Quizzes
  • Puzzles
  • Death notices
  • E-Reader

Regions

  • Waikato Times
  • Taranaki Daily News
  • Manawatū Standard
  • Wairarapa Times-Age
  • Nelson Mail
  • Marlborough Express
  • The Press
  • The Timaru Herald
  • The Southland Times

Magazines

  • NZ House and Garden
  • NZ Gardener
  • Your Weekend
  • Sunday
  • The House of Wellness

  • Death notices

  • E-Reader

  • Puzzles

  • Help Centre

About

  • About us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy
  • Terms & conditions
  • Editorial code
  • Help Centre
  • Contact us
  • Manage your subscription
Business
Business

Free Speech Union renews bid to reshape InternetNZ; says it opposes ‘wokester rule’

Tom Pullar-Strecker
Tom Pullar-Strecker|The Post
August 5, 2026 • 7:00am
Free Speech Union chairperson Stephen Franks has voiced concern over “wokeism” at InternetNZ and its revenue going to “matey causes”.
Free Speech Union chairperson Stephen Franks has voiced concern over “wokeism” at InternetNZ and its revenue going to “matey causes”.Photo: Supplied
Make The Post a preferred source in Google

The Free Speech Union is attempting to increase its influence over InternetNZ, the non-profit society that administers the “.nz” internet domain, after its then-chief executive Jonathan Ayling was elected to its board last year.

The lobby group is seeking to have its current chief executive, Jillaine Heather, and defence barrister Douglas Brow also elected to InternetNZ’s board after previously encouraging its supporters to join InternetNZ, en masse, so they could vote in its elections and on its motions.

In a call to action, Free Speech Union chairperson Stephen Franks said its supporters had an opportunity to “vote against wokester rule” and suggested InternetNZ was charging more than it needed for “.nz” registrations while “siphoning off revenue to matey cause groups in Wellington”.

Error: We’re unable to display the article or subscription options because of your network settings. Click here for more details

The Free Speech Union failed in its bid last year to secure enough votes to elect a second nominee or to change InternetNZ’s constitution, after thousands of people opposed to its agenda also signed up as new members.

Read more:

  • Free Speech Union wins seat on InternetNZ board, but key amendments rejected
  • InternetNZ accuses Free Speech Union of ‘destabilising’ the organisation
  • The Free Speech Union vs. InternetNZ: A battle of domains

InternetNZ’s membership has swelled to 4800, from about 280 before the Free Speech Union concerned itself with the organisation last year, as both supporters and opponents of the lobby group joined to influence its votes.

One of the constitutional changes the Free Speech Union had been seeking last year would have removed a reference to the society’s commitment to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

A jubilant observer said at the time that the Free Speech Union had been “spanked”, with another saying “a glorious gathering of nerds” had come together to “decisively vote down all the stupid FSU motions”.

The Free Speech Union’s fresh bid to elect supporters to InternetNZ’s board appears to have been prompted by concerns InternetNZ might change its membership rules to reduce the lobby group’s influence.

In a message to supporters, Franks drew attention to minutes of an InternetNZ board meeting that referred to a Government review of cybersecurity.

InternetNZ’s board said the review might “necessitate a future review of membership numbers and types to provide the Government with assurance that the membership has a commitment to the work of InternetNZ, that the organisation is stable and that the board has appropriate skills and diversity”.

Franks appeared sceptical. “Who in government is seeking that assurance? What part of government? Officials, or politicians? For what purpose?”, he said in his message to supporters, questioning whether it was “really the incumbent board that wants to purge the membership”.

Voting on the society’s board vacancies opened on July 24 and closes on Monday.

Communications Minister Paul Goldsmith told The Post he did not have concerns about the stability of InternetNZ and its membership base.

The issues were for InternetNZ to work out, he said. “I’ll work with them as best I can.”

InternetNZ chairperson Stephen Judd said the government review did not directly raise any questions about the stability of InternetNZ, but had referred to the Domain Name System and expressed a general interest in the governance of organisations that had a bearing on cybersecurity.

No motions on its membership structure were planned for its annual meeting on August 13, he said.

The tensions with the Free Speech Union were not within InternetNZ’s control, Judd said.

“If people look at what has actually happened in terms of the running of our registry and what the organisation actually does in terms of rules and so forth, they would see nothing of concern has happened.

“If we continue to provide really good registry services at a high quality then I think, over time, that will be the solution,” he said.

Tom Pullar-Strecker
Tom.Pullar-Strecker@stuff.co.nz

Tom Pullar-Strecker is a senior business journalist based in the parliamentary press gallery who specialises in economics, public policy and regulated industries.

-The Post
Send us a news tip

More from The Post

Watch: Kids of Lyall Bay School tell council they want safe zone, get it minutes later

Who says democracy has to be a slow beast? Lyall Bay kids go from submission to reality in minutes.

Auckland Council rates bills are arriving: Why is yours higher?

Some households will pay slightly more than the average 7.9% increase.

Wellington’s mayors head into crunch talks on super‐council plan

ANALYSIS: Months of public debate now come down to a closed‐door meeting, as the region’s mayors try to agree on a mega‐council proposal before Sunday’s Government deadline.

Treat your feet right

Sponsored
How to spot the signs of fungal nail infections and treat them quickly for happier, healthier nails.

AI is reshaping the world. Are our politicians ready to grapple with it?

We asked every major party about AI. Here's what they said.

War of words as wounded councillors challenge mayor on ‘autocratic’ demotions

Auckland councillors launched an extraordinary public attack on Mayor Wayne Brown accusing him of rewarding loyalty and punishing dissent.


  • Contact

    • Contact us
    • Help Centre
    • Send your stories to news@thepost.co.nz
  • About

    • About us
    • Advertise with us
    • Careers
  • Account

    • Your account
    • E-Reader
  • Policies

    • Editorial code
    • Terms & conditions
    • Privacy
    • Cookies policy

© 2026 Stuff Limited

3 Comments