/soy/ - Soyjaks

>You pussies could never survive in kuz era sharty
this

nusoibingos woudnt survive a FUCKING cod lobby keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeem

>>16861382
Colorjak you’re my favorite poster

Nigger

Marge who is kuzl

>>16861373 (OP)
And? Should we not yearn for a better party, free of any influence from paedophiles? fuggen jerdee

something something slippery slope

>>16861422
report it diddyblud 💀

>>16861425
massive piles of nigger shit is sharty culture

>>16861407
Kuz era sharty was good and mogs the shithole that is the nusharty, this is a shithole smuglet thread or not

>>16861422
WHEN WILL YOU SOYTRANNIES LEARN THAT CALLING EVERYTHING CP IS WHAT PEDOPHILES WANT YOU TO DO IN ORDER TO DESENSITIZE YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE. YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID THIS IS NO WHERE CLOSE TO CP

>>16861443
tsmt, soulless website since 2024

Up

>>16861462
>A child looking character with a bbc in its mouth
>Somehow not worth being upset about
Do quoteniggers really?

>>16861373 (OP)
Yeah facts, imo the issue is the double standards of the administration like its the same as the babyjak porn when jannies make pedophilic jokes its ok but when you do it you cop a perma and have to beg quote for an unban on the irc its ridiculous

>Nobody’s posting nigger shit that’s a conspiracy theory
>A few people may be posting nigger shit but it’s just bait so ignore it
>People are posting nigger shit but it’s been posted before so it’s fine
>Posting nigger shit is good, actually
We’re between steps 3 and 4

>>16861577
PHENOMENAL NUSOITRANNY FAIL KEEEEEEEEEEK

its a reppy generator thread. I wish you guys dont give it attention

>>16861556
YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID THIS ISNT THE POINT OF THE THREAD AT ALL SOYCUCK

Up

Compare the way this article is written to the current article on Smuglet.
https://archive.is/uShd5
From openly mocking retarded legalcucking and leaking over peadough woahjacques to this. Where did we go so wrong?

>>16861850
It’s the Newfags (unironically)

because quote would ban you for posting the same thing but with soylita. they're the same shit yet one is le bad but the other is kosher.
as icuckkkz said, either all of it is okay, or none of it is.

>>16861885
>>16861850
Sentient flags

>>16861373 (OP)
The fact its normalised and pushed by the administration though?

>>16861895
It's like some of the older guard in the Quotecord still remembers how the site used to be more fun before (((Fr✡️✡️t))) took over, but is too chickenshit to rock the boat too hard.

>>16861931
Tsmt

>>16861931
It’s to appeal to the ftm TikTok trannies and Reddit crybabies that use this site today. It’s so sad what happened to this website.

>>16861373 (OP)
Op you are a fucking nigger faggot

Up

>>16861956
>>16861931
>>16861850
You are der ‘cord (((kikes))) and pedophiles. Jkysa

>>16862014
Huh I guess the insults hit close to home huh? Kill yourself

>>16862087
New soytrannies can’t quote for shit

>>16861885
The 4cuck oldfags were right about being so hostile towards them, our retarded contrarianism brought us here

>>16862098
All of this retarded moralfagging and shitting of the site happened in like 2-3 months, it’s insane how fast it fell apart

>>16862124
Kek, yep you’re a newsoytranny

>>>16862124 (You)
>Kek, yep you’re a newsoytranny
You’re literally a 4cuck frognigger pedophile

It's fine to tell the OP to KHM or spam the thread with sage, but it's retarded when people try to unironically force some rule drama out of it about how OP is a pedophile and he needs to be perma'd.

>>16861895
actually never mind, they aren't the same shit. I take that back.
soylita is better than smuglet. soylita was actually a subvariant of gapejak, meanwhile smuglet is just traced from some loli character.
soylita BBC edits, thus, were less pedophilic than smuglet BBC edits. one was literally just a grown man's head molded into a smaller shape to look like a child, the other is actually a drawing of a child.
if I get banned for saying this, that really goes to show how retarded and inconsistent quotecord's morality is.
>>16861931
that's exactly what it is, but they also fail to understand one thing:
oldsois weren't faggots. they wouldn't have accepted smuglet, not because it's fuggen 'p, but because it's fucking brimstone traced from tranime. they would've PLEADED with kuz/doll to ban it for being NAS coal. and kuz/doll would've fucking done it or compromised by moving smuglet threads to /qa/, instead of pinning a smuglet thread and going "it's just bait cope nusois" like our current tranitors would.
everyone on this site either goes "DELETE THIS SHIT IT'S FUGGEN 'P" or "LET ME GOON TO TRANIME ON /SOY/" and they think that's the fucking site culture, and neither position actually represents TRVE shartee culshur. the sharty in 2023 wasn't a rulecucked moralfagged shithole like it is now, but it also wasn't a NAS gooner den like some of you niggers (and quotecord) want it to be. the admins weren't norulescucks that just allowed /soy/ to be filled with NAS goonerslop 24/7, and the userbase weren't apathetic degenerates immune to any and all bait. in reality, the admins were selective rulecucks that micromanaged the site and would ONLY rulecuck shit that made it worse, and the userbase were leaking clittycels that unironically thought low effort troonbait and BBC spam was being crafted by da 'cooord. they wouldn't ban shit because of autistic forced moral outrage, they'd ban it because it fucking sucked ass and made the site worse. the site safely hovered in a middle ground between rulecucked and norulescucked, and that was the best spot for the site to be in, hence why those eras were the fucking best and everything since has been shit.
smuglet is fucking NAS coal. is it pedophilic? probably tbh. but personally, I don't really give a fuck. I care more that it's fucking NAS COAL. it's a shitty "variant" and is not a soyjak. and thus, it makes my clitty leak, and if our admins weren't fagmins it'd be getting deleted or moved to /qa/ rn.
>>16862098
keep trying to blame newGODS, but the blame lies entirely on froot.

>>16862160
I’m the guy that posted neutralplier albeit, and I’ve been on this website longer than you, you can’t tell me what I am you fucking troon

>>16862203
Not even half a paragraph in and it’s already a fucking fact

>>16861407
Better = Less rules
Worse = more rules

>>16862204
You’re literally an offsiter neutralplier nigger

>>16861386
Just dont speak

its called being a loser and caring about what gets posted on soyboy wojak images website the #1 concern in your life

Just filter every namefag problem solved

>>16862203
Yeah everything ypu said is pretty much true im glad to see theres still some intelligent oldgods left

>>16862203
Shut up nigger, Shitlia was mostly used by unironic tranny pedophiles

>>16862203
I agree with you on blaming froot but a lot of new users clearly refused to adapt to the site's culture
>>16862245
>being a loser on the loser website le bad

>>16862203
Also I enjoy your lengthy essays, keep making them

>>16862305
Yep that’s bandwagon fallacy

Up

>>16862305
>the site's culture
that's because due to froot, this WAS the site's culture. adding rule 2 was a good idea IN THEORY, but in practice making a rule as fucking broad as "no pedophilia including jokes" on a site known for its shitflinging, inability to take things seriously, and constant trolling means the users will constantly be accusing each other of pedophilia and looking for ways to do so just to try and get one another banned for gegs. for example, someone says "I want to rape everything that moves", someone else goes "KILL YOURSELF YOU FUCKING PEDOPHILE, CHILDREN MOVE. WHY THE FUCK IS FROOT ALLOWING THIS SHIT?" in hopes of getting them banned.
so, obviously, from here, pedophilia became a constant fucking topic, rule 2 was treated like holy scripture and constantly cited in arguments, and the culture BECAME rule 2. to new users, this site's defining trait is "wow, they REALLY hate pedophiles!"
so, naturally, when someone new shows up and sees this site that seems to have such extreme moral positions against pedophilia, or someone from kiwifarms who will ALWAYS have the worst faith interpretation of the site possible because that's what KF specializes in checks the site, they start to ask questions about why the same people going "you're literally a child molester because you said you want to rape everything that moves and that would include children" are also posting dead babies and making jokes that should be seen as equally as bad. then older users who were already a bit iffy on things like DNB (/qa/ on 4cuck was a blue board so yes these people existed) or simply want to watch people they dislike get banned join in, and the answer to the question "how is posting actual dead children worse than saying you'll rape everything that moves" is obviously "it isn't", and if one is bannable, why shouldn't both be bannable? and when arguments like "DNB is 'p because you sick fucks are probably gooning to it" are being made, how can you possibly argue that DNB is okay without violating rule 2? how do you know froot won't ban you if you do? what if you fuck up your wording like a retard and it sounds pedophilic and the userbase all go "MOOOODS BAN HIM"? so oldsois who are against it fall into line too, because maybe if they act like soylita being posted during kuz was as bad as the 'p spam they'll be able to at least get a word in and convince someone that gore is still okay. and like every slippery slope, the process just continues from there, until the site is as rulecucked as can be.
new users didn't come here, bring their morals with them, and refuse to adapt to the site's culture. they came here and adapted to what looked like the site's culture. and can you really blame them for that?
before niggas start tossing out accusations, this doesn't mean I want pedophilia to be allowed on the site. froot could've avoided this by banning any unironic pedophiles for rule 1 (which is what kuz and doll had been doing btw), but instead he didn't think it through enough and now we're here. that basically sums up the issue with all of froot/quote era moderation, they can't just micromanage the site and ban people and judge things on a case by case basis, no, they have to introduce a new rule that has to be fucking interpreted because of just how much shit could fall under it (like does "kys" count as pushing people to suicide? is doxxing pushing people to suicide? does "DOX RAPE AND KILL THIS NIGGER" count as a credible threat?"), and it fucks up the site even more, and the userbase have to fall into line lest someone go "MOOOOODS HE MADE A JOKE ABOUT A MOSQUITO SUCKING HIM THAT'S ZOOPHILIA"

>>16862647
true

>>16862647
Gonna spend a while reading these essays, I appreciate you participating in my thread

>>16862647
>froot could've avoided this by banning any unironic pedophiles for rule 1 (which is what kuz and doll had been doing btw)
Technically speaking someone could say something like "raping kids is good, and you should do it" and it wouldn't fall under rule 1. It isn't illegal to say that (it should be doebeit), so shit like that stays up under "fair moderation standards." There was a reason why rule 2 was put into place, even if now it gets abused by whiny cucks

>>16862800
I might say something that will get me banned

Lots of guys who will rightfully point out that autistically crying/pearl-clutching over everything is retarded, but /only/ because they get dogpiled for being a fag.

>>16861394
Nusoi…

>>16862816
Arguably the biggest issue with rule 2 as it currently exists (at least other than the inconsistent standards) is that the very act of criticizing it runs the risk of getting you banned. I think it's really the only rule like that, which of course leads to people walking on eggshells about criticizing the rules on a site where that definitely shouldn't be happening.

>>16862800
well, my greater point in there is that fair moderation standards are gay and jannies should just moderate everything on a case by case basis and respond to issues as they arise, rather than writing a vague rule to address such things. adding an entire rule is how purity spirals are made. it happens irl too, laws have to be interpreted by the supreme court and shit because two people can look at them two different ways.
this website isn't a country doe, it's a dumbass meme website. the jannies don't have to have a specific rule to ban people they can just ban them. really they don't have to use rule 1 to ban them at all, they could literally just put "fuck off nigger" as the ban reason and if the userbase know why it probably won't be met with any opposition.
>>16862816
here, I'll say it for you
>raping kids is good, and you should do it
this statement is so absurdly fucked up that it's funny. it sounds like a joke. if someone posted it, it probably would be a joke. it's "pedophilic" but the person typing it probably isn't a pedophile.
considering that literal children on tiktok are saying shit like "FREE DIDDY HE DID NOTHING WRONG" or "nah blud epstein kind of had aura tho 💀 " for shock value, should such a statement REALLY be illegal? and, to apply this to the site (and risk getting banned), do you think pedo jokes were banned by froot because there's something more immoral about them than necrophilia jokes, incest jokes, or rape jokes (all of which are allowed even today btw), or do you think he banned them because people making pedo jokes on the same site that had grown infamous for its 'p spam problem was bad optics? after froot gigaquoted a pedo on kiwifarms, doesn't it seem more likely that he had no problem with pedo jokes and only included them under rule 2 to appease people who might criticize him if they saw pedo jokes on the site infamous for its 'p spam problem?
I can attest, there were pedo jokes in the kuz/doll era. yet, when 'p was actually spammed, the userbase didn't call it a gem or celebrate, they panicked and spammed "KUUUUUUUUUUUUZ DELETE THE FUCKING 'P" for as long as it was up. so in my mind, unless the admins allow it to happen by refusing to micromanage the site (the way quotecord refuse to), there is no chance of the site slippery sloping from "pedo jokes" to "actual pedophilia". you can say that pedo jokes would attract those types by making them feel welcome, and that the problems with 'cords in the kuz/doll era were a symptom of that, but in the time since rule 2 was added how many froot/quote era niggas in the soysphere have been exposed for being actual, unironic pedophiles? can you even count them? if banning pedo jokes stops that shit then how the fuck are we STILL getting new pedo scandals in the big '26?
>>16862941
tsmt
I remember bitching about rule 2 the day it was added because I recognized the precedent it set and I was shot down by froot himself, then I had soyteens go "dude are you a fucking pedo or something why are you arguing so hard against this" (I was literally like 16 in 2023 geg). from then onwards I gave up on criticizing it, fell back and conceded that "well okay rule 2 needs to exist obviously because we don't want pedos on the site, but I don't think (x) needs to be banned too" and continued that cycle with each new rule that arrived.
after I was banned from the site for 6 months just for triggering a wordfilter while the jannies continuously denied my appeals, doe, I don't really care enough to walk on eggshells. if I get banned again my life hardly changes, atp quotecord have more to lose from banning me than I do from getting banned since my autism is enough to singlehandedly boost the PPH.
>>16862882
I was optimistic about quote becoming admin early on because I thought he might want to de-rulecuck the site, but as time has progressed and he's shown off his 'zellig goon folder to "bait da nuswahs" and shit while keeping all froot era policies in tact and tightening the rules further, it seems far more likely that he's just one of those faggots that wants to take advantage of the site's purity spiral to try and make his weird fetishes look keyed to norulescacas and turn /soy/ into his personal gooning ground. I think nusois LARPing as oldsois and oldsois with a double digit IQ that recognize that "hey the site's a bit too moralfaggy now, it didn't used to be this way" but can't think critically enough to realize why or that quote could genuinely fix that with the snap of his fingers are his target audiences, they see NAS on /soy/ and think "WOW, KUZ HAD NAS ON /SOY/ TOO! I GUESS QUOTE REALLY IS BRINGING THE OLD SHARTY BACK!" meanwhile you still can't post gore, and their memory of the site is just flat out fucking wrong because you can check archives and see for yourself that the kuz era's 'log wasn't just mountains of furry fat fetish bait threads 24/7 and NAS on /soy/ was "allowed" but not encouraged.

I barely even noticed that shit as I scrolled past it. Its a shitty trace of a completely non-detailed anime foid not child abuse retards

>>16863600
its a trace of some blue archive lolipedo character…

smuglet was traced from blue archive loliniggerfaggotry. therefore, sexually depicting it is lolicon. lolicon is 'p.