Jul 26th, 2026 16:37 JST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts

Friday, July 24th 2026

Framework Adjusts Pre-Order Configurations After 100%+ LPCAMM2 Price Increase

Framework recently published a pricing update regarding some of its Laptop 13 Pro SKUs, confirming that it has been subject to an unexpected 100%+ price increase for LPCAMM2 modules, which has meant that Laptop 13 Pro prices have had to increase in order to cover increased costs. Framework says that the price increase "goes far beyond anything we had predicted and anything we're able to absorb without placing our ability to operate at real financial risk."

One issue that has repeatedly come up in the Framework community on Reddit, for instance, is that the company has effectively gone back on a promise it made when it announced the Laptop 13 Pro. At launch, Nirav Patel, Framework's CEO, stated that "we are going to honor any existing pricing for any pre-order that gets placed on our website...that's not to say that we're not going to end up changing prices in the future for new orders, but we're not going to go back and change prices for orders that anyone's ever actually placed already."
Despite this promise, there have been a number of early Laptop 13 Pro pre-order buyers who have posted screenshots of emails from Framework stating that the configuration that they had pre-ordered would not be available due to the RAM price increase. A number of reports in the subreddit noted that their pre-order configurations were changed, with reports confirming that prices have been lowered due to reduced memory capacity in their new configurations.

In Framework's memory pricing update, the company says that "We have enough LPCAMM2 memory modules on hand to cover all existing pre-orders, but unfortunately not in the mix of 64 GB, 32 GB, and 16 GB that matches those pre-orders." The statement also explains that, although prices for later batches of pre-orders (batch 4 of laptops and batch 7 of mainboards) are being adjusted, in most cases with 64 GB orders being stepped down to 32 GB of RAM or 32 GB configurations being reduced to 16 GB, buyers will still pay the original pre-order price for their respective new configuration—configurations adjusted to 32 GB will pay the original 32 GB prices, and those who still have 64 GB configurations will still pay the same price.

Framework's full memory pricing update reads:
Framework Laptop 13 Pro updates

We've consistently held and communicated a philosophy of absorbing price increases wherever we can, making pricing predictable and ensuring that when you place a pre-order, you'll be able to get the product you ordered at the price you ordered it at. We've been able to do that to date with Framework Laptop 13 Pro, and have absorbed increases in a number of areas. However, we recently received a cost update from our LPCAMM2 supplier that goes far beyond anything we had predicted and anything we're able to absorb without placing our ability to operate at real financial risk. Rather than the low-to-mid double-digit percentage increase we had forecast from Q2 to Q3 on LPCAMM2 costs, we received prices that are more than double that of the prior inventory we had brought in. We have enough LPCAMM2 memory modules on hand to cover all existing pre-orders, but unfortunately not in the mix of 64 GB, 32 GB, and 16 GB that matches those pre-orders.

After evaluating a number of possible paths forward, we're proceeding on the one that we believe minimizes the impact of this challenge. We have enough 64 GB modules in inventory to cover pre-order batches through Batch 4 of laptops and Batch 7 of Mainboards. For orders beyond that configured with 64 GB, we've updated the order configuration to use a 32 GB module at the original 32 GB module price. After that, we allocated the remaining 32 GB modules to DIY Edition and Mainboard pre-orders configured with 32 GB through Batch 4 of laptops and Batch 7 of Mainboards. For DIY Edition and Mainboard orders beyond that configured with 32 GB, we've updated the order configuration to use a 16 GB module at the original 16 GB price. Note that because we don't currently have a Core X7 Ultra pre-built configuration with 16 GB of memory, we have not adjusted pre-built orders that originally contained 32 GB. That is a configuration we plan to introduce later.

Alongside these changes to existing pre-order configurations, we've updated the pricing on our website for newly placed pre-orders. Our new LPCAMM2 pricing is below the substantially higher cost we're now sourcing it at to try to mitigate some of the impact to new customers. While we have kept our original 16 GB LPCAMM2 pricing for now, we anticipate we will consume the remaining inventory of modules we brought in at lower cost soon, and will then need to increase pricing for new orders. The system and Mainboard pricing for new orders also reflects an upcoming increase in Core Ultra Series 3 processor pricing that impacts X7 and X9 configurations, an increase in Windows license costs, and increases in memory, storage, and other silicon costs for some of our Ryzen AI 300 Series configurations.
Sources: Framework, r/Framework on Reddit
Add your own comment

6 Comments on Framework Adjusts Pre-Order Configurations After 100%+ LPCAMM2 Price Increase

#1
Athena
The dude stood up and said that they were not going to charge more once shipped, so, he never should have said it

they need to take a haircut and go with what they told people in the first place, or they could be looking at lawsuits which will be many times more expensive

I know it sucks for them, but, that vid is pretty darn clear, so they got no way out of it, at the worst case, they might have to slow down to ship the orders...
Posted on Reply
#2
SiliconSeraph
I'm already so sick of companies shrugging and saying "market conditions" to every price increase they do, but even that has it's merits (albeit few) compared to this variety of re-pricing. If someone preorders something in a specific configuration and you refuse to honor that original purchase, that's getting into bait-and-switch legal territory. I like Framework's main concept of repair-ability and modularity, but it's so far out of the reach of the average consumer financially* that when something like this happens, it gives people more reason to not engage, and with reason!


*The base model 12" laptop with an i3, 8GB of RAM, no storage and no OS is ~$800 not including shipping + tax.
Posted on Reply
#3
alexrose1uk
The thing is, the RAM increases have been staggering.
In many markets RAM is now up 3-400%, and SSDs are up around 250% over a year ago, dependent on market.

From what I can see here, Framework are NOT charging customers more; they're simply saying they do not have enough capacity obtained at prices in any way sanely connected to the prices projected, so they are reducing the amount of RAM supplied, BUT they are also reducing the price charged to match the pricing at the time of the original order; with the option for the customer to cancel.

IE if the customer ordered 64GB, they now recieve 32GB, BUT PAY FOR 32GB (AS PRICED AT POINT OF ORDER) NOT FOR 64GB.

"in most cases with 64 GB orders being stepped down to 32 GB of RAM or 32 GB configurations being reduced to 16 GB, buyers will still pay the original pre-order price for their respective new configuration—configurations adjusted to 32 GB will pay the original 32 GB prices, and those who still have 64 GB configurations will still pay the same price."

That is probably about the best they could do whilst reasonably facilitating pre-orders. I'm not saying that's great, but if the volumes and price increases are genuinely enough to threaten the actual financial security of the company to the point of them making substantially negative profit if they just went ahead, would we prefer to see them added to the list of companies who are no longer in operation?

Whilst framework ARE expensive, and they are premium, they simply do not have the volume of scale as larger companies in the laptop space to absorb unlimited costs or bring prices down as low, and are doing something more modular and upgradeable, which justifies them carrying a premium.

Realistically though, if profit on a unit after all costs etc is say...$200 by way of example...and the bill of materials price rise by $400...can you really expect a medium size company to absorb that hit, potentially hundreds or thousands of times. No, not really.

Dell, HP, Lenovo, Apple...no company can absorb the rises involved, at the scale they've risen, without taking fundamental damage, and Framework simply is nowhere near the size of some of these other players.
Posted on Reply
#4
_JP_
AthenaThe dude stood up and said that they were not going to charge more once shipped, so, he never should have said it

they need to take a haircut and go with what they told people in the first place, or they could be looking at lawsuits which will be many times more expensive

I know it sucks for them, but, that vid is pretty darn clear, so they got no way out of it, at the worst case, they might have to slow down to ship the orders...
Very much this.
I get both positions. From Framework's perspective, waiting for more LPCAMM could mean even higher costs and profits not coming in, to keep the company going.
From the people that pre-ordered, a change in an agreed deal for which cash was advanced, makes this a deal-breaker (I assume) unless for the most loyal to the project and could accommodate a lesser configuration (even if marginally cheaper).
I would cancel the pre-order. I could accept a price revision for no RAM included and then I'd figure it out, but it does not seem that that option is even on the table, from Framework.
Another thing from that communication is that hardware is being cost-revised...but why are the Windows licenses as well? (Unless they mean their own internal VL)
Posted on Reply
#5
Patriot
Every other OEM only promises locked prices for 10-15 days now... because of this madness.
Posted on Reply
#6
Chrisy
Maybe my reading skills are not on the top this morning but if I understood it right the 16GB pre-orders are not affected?
Or currently unknown what batch from they will be affected?

I also did not buy an LPCAMM2 module myself when I placed the pre-order, specifically because of the CEO’s promise that the price would be the one shown at the time of pre-ordering. If he had not said that, I would have bought a module myself at the price at that time.
Posted on Reply
Jul 26th, 2026 16:37 JST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts