Advertisement oop
Story continues below
Advertisement 1

Terry Newman: Is it no longer safe to be a conservative? 

Investigators are now probing whether left-wing terror played a role in former U.K. MP's murder

Article content

Ann Widdecombe, a 78-year-old former Tory who crossed over to Reform before retiring, was found dead in her Dartmoor, U.K., home by police last week, about 24 hours after she stopped responding to text messages from a Channel 5 producer and failed to appear on the show remotely.

Article content

Before the messages between Widdecombe and the producer stopped, she had been in good spirits, chatting and joking.

Article content
Article content
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
Article content

Then, there was silence. The producer’s messages were left unread. His calls unanswered. He called her personal assistant, who contacted her gardener.

Article content
Article content

The gardener discovered Widdecombe’s body the following day at her retirement home, which she lovingly referred to as “Widdecombe’s Rest.” She had been hit on the head with a hammer 21 times as she ate lunch, prosecutors say.

Article content

Police have described Widdecombe’s murder as a “targeted attack.” As of Monday, the investigation was taken over by counter-terrorism police, who are considering whether 28-year-old Joshua Kerry, who was charged on Monday for her murder, was motivated by “left-wing, anarchist and single-issue terrorism,” which appears to be common enough of a threat that U.K. police have an acronym for it, LASIT.

Article content

Widdecombe was a well-known Catholic social conservative who advocated for persecuted Christians globally — so much so that she received a papal damehood from Pope Benedict XVI in January 2013.

Article content

In 2011, shortly after her retirement from the British House of Commons, she gave a speech in which she claimed that, when it comes to government, “You stand a better chance of earnest representation if you are a hedgehog than if you are a persecuted Christian.”

Article content
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

In a 2019 speech for the Oxford Union Society, Widdecombe argued against deplatforming and censorship. In it, she explained why free speech was important to her, as someone who grew up in the wake of the Second World War and lived through the Cold War.

Article content

And now she’s been murdered.

Article content

In a press conference, Reform U.K. spokesperson Zia Yusuf said, “I cannot tell you why Ann was killed. That is for the police and the courts. What I can tell you is that counter-terrorism police are investigating her murder as a suspected act of terrorism.”

Article content

Yusuf then told those present that he could also tell them about “the climate in which she was killed,” which he described as “a relentless narrative from politicians and the media that Reform U.K. is a threat — a threat to be urgently stopped.” Yusuf claimed that this narrative is “so relentless, it constitutes incitement.”

Article content

He further alleged that the party is being targeted “because we say things that are unfashionable among many in Westminster, but are popular in the country at large.”

Article content

Yusuf said it was difficult to share the type of comments that had been said about Widdecombe, who he referred to as a “treasure,” but that it was important because “we cannot ever allow this to happen again.”

Advertisement 1
Advertisement 2
Advertisement
Article content

He quoted Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, who had described Widdecombe as a “poisonous bigot” who wants to “drag us back to the 19th century” and “throw minorities out in the cold on the way.”

Article content

Yusuf stressed that Lammy had “boldly declared” that: “We must stand up to them before it’s too late.”

Article content

Yusuf also pointed a finger at the former health secretary Wes Streeting, who said: “If only science had a cure for Ann Widdecombe.”

Article content

He then noted that a woman on Twitter had said: “Ann Widdecombe better go this week. She is a little fascist beast.” Shockingly, he pointed out that this was written by Jess Phillips, former parliamentary under-secretary of state for safeguarding and violence against women and girls.

Article content

He further quoted Liberal Democrats Leader Ed Davey as saying, “The greatest threat to the Britain we love doesn’t come from Tehran or Moscow. It comes from within. I’m talking about Nigel Farage and Reform.”

Article content

Yusuf ended by saying, “Is it any wonder, with such rhetoric relentlessly levelled at Reform, that some may be moved to try to eliminate that supposed threat through lethal violence?”

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

One has to wonder whether such statements encouraged Heather Herbert, a 50-year-old transgender employee at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland, who was recently arrested and charged with allegedly posting on social media that Widdecombe’s death was “good news,” and that she hoped it was an “extremely painful death.”

Article content

This sort of zealous dehumanization takes place elsewhere in the western world, as well, including in Canada.

Article content

Last Wednesday, protesters surrounded Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston’s car and smashed his windshield while the premier and staff were inside the vehicle. And on Thursday, at a pancake breakfast in Edmonton, a woman yelled at Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, “You’re a f—ing fascist.… You sold us out to corporations,” and had to be ushered away.

Article content

And being on the left doesn’t necessarily protect you from the left, either. A video circulating on social media shows Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi being accosted at a public event for having taken a picture with Israeli Ambassador Iddo Moed at the Calgary Stampede. Nenshi eventually caved and released a statement apologizing for the “harm” the photograph caused.

Article content

This was the worst possible response. No politician should shrink and apologize to zealous leftists like this. The message it sends is that they were right and their methods are correct. Instead, a strong message needs to be sent: you don’t have the right to try to intimidate those you disagree with, through words or by force.

Article content

National Post

Article content

This column was originally published in Right? A National Post Newsletter. Sign up now.

Article content
Advertisement 2
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Conversation

|

Top Comments

    1. Comment by Robert Mattioli.

      Excellent column. On this same topic, Rubio gave an insightful speech about leftist terrorism, covered verbatim here in NP.

      One contributing factor to the extremes on all sides is the need for outrageous, extreme commentary in order to garner attention.

      The days of boring statements like "I disagree with Mr. X on topic Y" is replaced with over-the-top personal vitriol and lamenting that the "person must be stopped", as Terry Newman notes above.

      This same rhetoric might get many of us to roll our eyes, but loosens the screws of those who are already ideologically possessed and unstable.

      One suggestion that may be a challenge for NP is to rein in the editorials of those who use extreme language in dehumanizing others. I'm reminded of Raymond de Souza's latest rant about Trump. Disagree all you want with Trump's policies, but the dehumanizing talk is a call to action for those who substitute violence for meaning in their own lives.

    2. Comment by Kris Kennedy.

      Both the left and the right have had their fair share of violence so to suggest only the leftists are violent is rather absurd.

      What's more disconcerting nowadays is how both sides seem unwilling to admit neither have any monopoly on ideas or virtue and that good polices.have come from both throughout history.

      And while I'm a centrist on some issues I remain more conservative on others and I see nothing wrong with parties that stick more to their ideological foundations while allowing for flexibility on matters that deserve that consideration

    3. Comment by Mik Ball.

      Extremism exists on both sides of the political spectrum and is inevitably a hazard to the democracy and freedom we enjoy.

      Extremists use propaganda to lure people to their fold and fear to intimidate people into showing support for their agenda.

      Extremists do not hide their objectives and are readily identifiable given our respect for democracy and freedom - we tolerate their notions despite the fact that they are based on the curtailment of both.

      Extremists invariably turn to violence against their opponents and against those unwilling to support their ideology.

      Demonization is used to prompt violence and to stifle negative reaction to it.

      Extremist are well aware that people left unintimidated by their power are hazardous to it.

      Extremists are authoritarians and the best way of thwarting their plans is to deny them the authority to fulfil them through the democratic process.

    4. Comment by Buck Baldwin.

      By the way, UK police have arrested Joshua Kerry, 28, a gentle, polite, quiet bearded young man with long hair who lived alone in public housing in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, for this apparent targeted murder.

      What's amazing is how the left raises such great fear and anger over perfectly intelligent, reasonable but vocal conservative critics, within the minds of what appear to be the most passive and timid of people, to the point where these minions turn into roboton 'Manchurian Candidates', going out of their way to commit political acts of violence of the worst kind.

      A favourite tactic of middle eastern theocracy extremists was and still is to enlist the member of a family, for cash of course, who had serious mental health issues, strap a remote-controlled suicide vest on him, and send him to their target - usually a market, or police station, or a politician.

      In a strange sort of way, this ends up being a similar sort of thing - a quiet young man with mental health issues and liberal values, receives inspiration from numerous leftist personalities who literally identify a conservative figure for scorn and retribution for simply expressing their conservative opinions in such an influential manner.

      I mean, a speech where she said that: “You stand a better chance of earnest representation if you are a hedgehog than if you are a persecuted Christian”, is powerful, insightful commentary on the radical leftist ideology that has infiltrated into every niche, crack and crevice of British life.

      Does it remind you of Tyler James Robinson, or Luigi Mangione, or the many attempted assassins of President Trump?

    5. Comment by Lorne Jonsson.

      In the US, the 2nd Amendment is not in place for hunting rifles, its to protect against authoritarianism.

      Lawful gun owners know the responsibility of possession, as did anyone growing up through the early 80s when pickup trucks in the high school student parking lot had a rifle and a shotgun mounted in plain view by the back window... and there was never a question about it, even in Canada, in the school i went to.

      Who changed the narrative? Who twisted the morals? The same bunch trying to disarm everyone.

    Latest from Shopping Essentials
    1. Advertisement 2
      Story continues below