YouTube's Inauthentic Content Policy - Explained!

Creator Insider
Creator Insider
890K subscribers
13K views 5 days ago Inside YouTube Podcast
YouTube's VP of Trust & Safety, Matt Halprin, sits down with Creator Insider ‪@ReneRitchie‬ to chat about YouTube Partner Program policies around what was termed inauthentic content, and is now being broken down into: generic or repetitive content, unsatisfying or off-putting content, and AI personas related to sensitive topics. What can and can't be monetized, what can lead to demonetization, how appeals work, how mass-flagging is treated, and where and how AI factors in. …...more
...more
Nobody has issues with YouTube's rules. Everybody has issues with automated systems flagging channels. Everybody has issues with 0 ability to contact YouTube once flagged. Everybody has issues with the only way to contact YouTube is to hope YouTube replies on Twitter.
111
The issue is not with the policies themselves, but with the way they are interpreted and enforced. Unfortunately, relying heavily on automated systems to apply these policies can sometimes lead to serious mistakes that unfairly affect many channels, which is something I have personally experienced. I also believe that penalizing all associated channels simply because one channel received a violation can be excessively harsh. In my view, this approach may unintentionally harm both creators and the platform itself. I hope these cases can be reviewed individually and with greater consideration for the specific circumstances of each channel. Another concern is the very long waiting period after submitting an appeal or applying for monetization to be reinstated. In my case, I waited nearly two months before receiving a response informing me that my monetization reinstatement request had been rejected. A clearer and faster review process would greatly reduce the uncertainty and pressure experienced by creators.
128
The problem is, YouTube's current detection system is exceptionally flawed, thousands of creators such as myself lost everything because these detection systems falsely flagged content as mass-produced and you don't give us a chance to prove it wrong.
83
It's incredibly unfair. YouTube’s flawed system is ruining creators lives by falsely flagging authentic work as mass-produced, even when we create our own animations, write our own scripts, and record our own voices. The worst part is that despite all my efforts to improve my content and avoid AI-generated audiovisuals, the system still flagged me as unauthentic.
64
I’m confused how a channel can stay monetized for two years and then get demonetized, even though the content and format never changed 🤔
11
That costume change was so indicative of AI slop ❤
10
What about channels that get demonetized but still show ads? YouTube keeps 100% of the revenue.
21
YouTube will eventually get what's coming to it. Just imagining the negative energy generated by their malice... People don't talk about it much, but YouTube has destroyed so many lives—financially and psychologically. Sure, there have to be rules, but letting people create and dedicate themselves even quitting their jobs and pouring years of effort into it only to simply cut it all off one day without explanation or warning, and then stealing a whole month's worth of earnings... to me, that is pure malice. I can actually feel a certain negative heaviness when I open YouTube.
15
YT Stole over $4,000.00 in already earned ad revenue from our charity partners by waiting till the end of Jan. (after they run tons of ads over our partners videos).
2
YouTube is getting closer to pushing people away altogether and ending up like MySpace. Nothing lasts forever
8
This was very helpful, thank you and please more like this that provide the details we need. What would be wonderful if possible would be to have an actual extended segment showing a creator build process from beginning to end with Youtube providing insight along the way - i.e. "this would not meet the guidelines and here's why." Thanks again!
‘We evaluate with a fresh set of eyes.’ That is NOT true. Your AI flagging system overrides human review the majority of the time.
21
YT needs this, the slop (not just AI, the ranking videos, the roblox rants videos, all the slop) needs to go or the platform is dead. It is a place to share your own creations, not a place to game the system and get rich quick.
4
Thanks for update 😊
9
Every day YouTube introduces a new policy or a new label, from inauthentic content to unsatisfying or off putting content. My question to YouTube is this. Is it even possible to create content that satisfies every single person who comes across it? Even this very video YouTube made explaining the policy could be considered unsatisfying because it doesn't clearly explain why creators are being demonetized or why YouTube is holding their previous earnings while continuing to run ads on those same videos. If the content is truly unsatisfying, why keep showing ads on it and keeping the revenue? Life contains both positive and negative experiences. People should be free to choose what they want to watch. There is no possible way to create content that every person will enjoy or approve of. It would be much more helpful if YouTube simply said, We don't want AI generated content, instead of hiding behind vague policy terms that can mean different things to different people. For example, even something as simple as crossing a road can cause emotional distress for some individuals. Seeing someone being arrested by the police can be emotionally distressing to others. Does that mean those situations should never be shown? Another example, if someone records themselves helping a dying dog on the side of the road to encourage others to show kindness, YouTube may call it emotional manipulation. But how is inspiring compassion automatically manipulation? It seems like YouTube wants creators to make content that makes everyone happy. But how is that possible? And even if creators manage to do that, YouTube may still label it as repetitive content if they continue making the type of videos their audience enjoys. Every time YouTube changes its policies, are creators expected to delete all of their old videos because the new rules no longer allow that style of content? Does that really make sense? If viewers watch emotional or dramatic content, subscribe to the channel, and continue coming back for more, doesn't that show they actually enjoy that type of content? Shouldn't the audience be the ones deciding what they want to watch instead of vague policies deciding for them?
33
Thank goodness these policies are targeting ai slop channels. However YouTube uses ai moderation which makes a lot of mistakes. So there is one thing to be happy about (wiping ai slop) but many things to worry about such as false demonization or false channels deletions
1
If you suspend a channel from ypp, you still actually show adverts on the video don’t you? Surely if the video is not suitable for adverts then there should be no adverts, isn’t that right?
16
Do not get it twisted. This was all designed so that YouTube can take a month of your earnings and make you work for free for five months. They want to keep all the ad revenue and not pay people. It's literally the most despicable thing a company has ever done.
28
Thank you for this info
1
Where can we find these guidelines IN WRITING? The last time I read the guidelines I saw the new definition of "inauthentic content." I didn't see anything about many of the other issues you're discussing.
2
It's nice to see the Fruit of the Loom guys can still find work! 😆
4
Nice information❤🙏
So much to take in. Some of the things mentioned we do know already. but what MOST creators are concern about is the "automated system" whatever it is that YouTube have in place, it automatically determines a channels conclusion without an actual human reviewing it.
1
Matt Halprin brought clarity to this. Say, while we're at it... how do we find the number of likes versus dislikes on our videos anymore? That is a meaningful metric. Why did it go away?
1
When is something a "policy" and when is it a "guideline"? YouTube continually flipflops between the two, at managements convenience. Unfair to creators, unfair to viewers.
7
Punishment definitely don't fit the crime, imagine any other job where you get suspended for 90 days with zero real explanation, smh.
4
This doesn’t help. He says No templates. Yet, they are making it easier to make TV series that need the same format or template. Which is it?
9
This is very helpful. But it will be much better if real humans review all channels instead so they can do the job very effectively. Thank you for all you do YouTube.
11
Everyone understands the policy. Creators are banging their heads against an AI wall when trying to appeal. These two men know this.
4
Nice ❤ thanks 🎉🎉🎉
1
I suggest giving us a filter option to filter out low quality A.I. content.
1
How about a channel that auto-downloads 600 of my videos that I created over a five year period. My voice, my face, my title, my visuals … and then they put snow flake visual noise over my video … and then they reupload 600 videos to their channel over 72 hours. And my viewers are interacting with the fake channel as if it were me. Shouldn’t there be a place where I can just flag his whole channel as nothing but stolen content? The only recourse I seemed to have was a video by video copyright claim. But why should I provide my real name and address to report a thief to the authorities?
6
i would never monetize my channel for many reasons but one thing is certain, my followers and myself care more about my audio quality over visuals. i used to care more about the visual presentation when i started out but the processing time takes way longer than it used to
@ReneRitchie Hi. I responded to your reply to me in a previous video, but did not get a follow-up. Shot in the dark, but is there any way I can have more of a voice in regards to YouTube policy changes? Is there any way to get in touch with you for a handful of questions to understand your position? Thanks
Terimakasih informasinya kk ❤❤🎉
"Be Original", "Be Creative," When Half Of Youtube Is Low Effort Unoriginal "Reaction" content! Stop Incentivising Content Theft!!!!
11
Real question here about the first one, repetitive content. So a channel with the same guy talking in front of the camera, with the same studio background, talking about exactly the same topic every time (like : movies...)... From now, these channels are bad, right ? Many successful channels have worked on that repetitive template but now Youtube will no longer push them. That is what your're saying, right ? But what do we have to do now? changing the guy in front of the cam every time? changing the background everytime ? changing the topic everytime ? (this time movie, next time literature, next time base-ball, next time cooking, next time music lesson…one time in studio with a specific backgound, another one outside, another time at another place etc.)... Probably like a movie director ? who makes a different movie each time with different actors, locations, stories etc; and don't repeat themself… This mean youtube wants us to use AI tools to be like a movie director, right ?
4
Nice information ❤❤
4
This is very helpful. But my questions is: what is your stands with AI voiceover in the near future?
4
Thinks, Best of video ❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉
1
Are you going to use AI to judge people's channels? Even those using templates for a completely legitimate reason? When they ask for an explanation will you reply using templated responses? Will people even be able to contact you? They don't feel like they can at the moment.
9
What about those who clones other people's channel resemblance and even a similar identify using AI?
3
Isn’t the issue of “repetitive content” counterproductive to the new “series feature”? I’ve read that creators can now upload series and seasons, or categorize their content as part of a series they produce themselves. Based on what I’ve heard here, this kind of content would be penalized by default. Wouldn’t that defeat the purpose of the feature? I’m also thinking about Let’s Play series or video podcasts. While the content of each episode may be substantially different, the overall look and style are often quite similar. Could you perhaps clarify how this is handled? I’d be very interested to hear your thoughts.
3
The automatic translation into Brazilian Portuguese states that it’s true: when a user reports a video 1,000 times, the channel may simply receive an automatic penalty even if it’s within the rules. It would be worth looking into this. (This appears to be an error, but it could confuse many people. It’s not an issue for me, but I’m just pointing out that this passage was incorrectly translated by the AI, and the same thing could happen to our videos.) 8:05
1
YouTube should simply tell content creators DON'T NICHE TOO MUCH.....and DON'T BE SUCCESSFUL.....If you focus on a niche, it becomes REPETITIVE CONTENT.....if your content is enjoyed widely they claim it's INAUTHENTIC..... confusing and frustrating
3
I get a ton of comments from viewers that think my videos are AI. I spend a ton of time and money on camera gear, lighting, sound, and editing. yt
3
And who decides whether something is artistic/creative or not? Do they have art directors in their offices working as reviewers? (I know they don't have them; I'm just being ironic)
5
What about repetitive vp's talking about content?
5
I enjoy watching forensic crime investigations, unfortunately the amount of times I come across the same video posted on YT backwards visually (content is normal aural content, whereas the buildings and names are backwards visually), or added sound to make it seem like it is the original (not A.I.), or a TV series that is not chopped and sounds bad. The companies that own the content are possibly oblivious to this as the final product seems to avoid normal YT scanning detection.
My suggestion: YouTube, please when you are breaking down our monthly mile Stone also let us know if all the videos we are uploading is under the guidelines. So no one spends month's building, only for one to be told there's something wrong when they want to apply to the YPP. Thank you .
1
Hi team — running into an issue I can’t find documentation on. My channel has 100k+ subs and averages 100k views/video, well above YPP’s public thresholds. When I try to apply, I get ‘Build your channel history, you can apply once you have more history’ instead of the actual application. I’ve contacted Studio support but only received automated responses with no resolution. Could someone check if there’s a backend flag (verification, strikes, or account trust) blocking my application? Happy to provide my channel details if needed. Thanks for reading.”
do you have any examples to show ? does it matter for HAPPY BIRTHDAY CHANNELS TOO?
1
P.S. Literally all videos on youtube’s platform are unsatisfying or off-putting to someone This is the kind of policy that will discourage freedom of discussing difficult topics… news… journalism.. really anything vaguely 1st amendment related.
it doesn't matter what you do..if youtube doesn't push your content. the channel dies.
4
Extremely helpful information for SO many channels. Being authentic, doing your own thing is exactly what should be rewarded on the platform not AI Slop or content farming.
16
And something else I forgot, the people stealing my videos and making those AI voiceover videos with my video clips, you have to be cheating with the views because they get so many more views than I do. It’s so obvious and these channels should be removed.
12
Sometimes YouTube's automated system makes mistakes. Two days ago, one of my videos received a strike and was removed, even though it had a lot of views. I submitted an appeal, and after reviewing it, YouTube apologized and restored my video.😢
cant believe i pay for this ! youtube is done!!!
So you used AI sequences in this video and you didn't disclose it with the AI label. You should be removed from the YPP for that. The irony!
8
As a side note it should be the audience that decides content they like. You have marked me twice for YPP removal claiming inauthentic content. When if you do major keywords in my niche you will see videos that have broken upload limits to game the system 50 hour solid color screen videos should not be possible. Zero creativity and they are all monetized and getting millions of views because youtube rewards them while slapping artists and creators arbitrarily that actually do some work. I have to make all my videos 3 hours long because otherwise they get no traction. Just look up red background and you will see someone with 3 of the top spots just posting a solid red screen for hours. (At least what my search shows.)
2
Hey YouTube Insider 😊🖐️
3
My 2nd Channel got demonitized using YouTubes Games and AI Make that make sense! Calling it inauthentic content. I appealed and lost. A 7 year old channel. That I have never had a strike on or gone against community guidelines. My main channel I do the same videos every Wednesday for years. Am I now at risk on my main channel now????
3
We would like it if YouTube stops relying on AI moderation, because too many times AI has removed innocent channels who have not broken any rules. For example, a bunch of animation channels got deleted because YouTube's AI moderation thought their animation channels were undisclosed use of AI, which is ironic, all things considered... so, please address the frankly very flawed AI moderation tools your platform relies on. Put more humans involved in the review process!
6
So why cant YouTube block/take down channels that broadcast still images? Mostly ai generated puzzles, statements or slop). They arnt videos and shouldn't be on the platform. No matter how much you report them, YouTube keeps them up because their systems are getting fooled by the content. But as a human we can detect it. Also YouTube should reward those who report violations, especially if its a large report that takes alot of violated content down. Biggest problem is the reporting systems, they dont agree. Ever. Even worse in the ads.
Thank You YouTube family🎉😊
3
Ai being in control reviewing videos is the main issue we need actual humans. History time is a history channel and only does no ai and even they got a video demonetized. If they have issues how do smaller history channels survive 😨 Also 90 days is too long to reapply to the program.
1
People who make AI things in seconds receive more than those of us who spend hours of time ourselves or to pay a human editor. What YT finds inauthentic could be the one thing preventing my viewers from finding my message. And I talk about writing. Educational things. Not brain rot. Is there a way for it to focus on not pushing brain rot over educational channels?
1
Because I have doubts about YouTube's opaque evaluation criteria, I've decided to stop spending so much time creating videos. Unless you're making videos purely as a hobby, most people aren't going to invest their time and effort unless they're compensated according to clear and transparent criteria. Spending more time on a video doesn't necessarily guarantee a better result, but under the current system, there's a real risk that the overall quality of content on YouTube will continue to decline.
❤️❤️❤️ is there incentive for posting to YouTube exclusively?
1
"Hey @creatorinsider / YouTube Team, can we please get an update to the scale-detection AI systems specifically targeting the massive wave of automated Roblox scams and hijacked channel live loops? Scammers are constantly bypassing standard guidelines by streaming identical 'Free Robux' text and phishing templates across thousands of hacked accounts. The AI needs to automatically flag and block these repetitive stream patterns before they go live to protect young viewers. Please forward this to the Trust & Safety team!"
1
My career has already ended for this
1
Thanks ❤ nice information 🎉
1
Ich habe soo oft hassrede und sexueller Inhalt gemeldet und jedes Mal wurde es nicht so eingestuft. Eigentlich schade weil ich auch die creator Accounts analysiere und die fake Accounts melde was euch leider nicht interessiert.
2
I do not enjoy search right now, and so, watch less. I'd really like an option to omit all AI videos in search. They are labeled, so let us omit them if we choose, please, instead of forcing them on us. First search got swamped with shorts, which ruined YouTube for me, and now there's a sea of AI results that can’t even be filtered. I just can’t be bothered to go look for content I want to watch anymore.
1
So here i am create content that took me 80+ hours more than year and YT still struggle to understand who my audience is 😂😭 so Browse feature is always weak 😳.. You should update your algorithm and add him ability to "see" to watch whole video we creators doing and decide then if video need pushing i saw all kind of slops and High quantity AI channels that get pushed some have milions of views. Just watching numbers Data and take decision on this alone aint enough anymore in 2026
2
My channel was demonetized for inauthentic content. I made adjustments and it was auto declined when I reapplied. Can I please get a real person to review this and let me know what the issue is? My channel is over 20 years old and I’ve never had an issue until recently.
Thanks Youtube.
been with them since 2011 and growth has never happened. YT is a weird thing.
1
Thank you sir YouTube
2
They keep talking about content your own content and about YouTubers being genuine however the genuine YouTubers don’t really have the money to implement everything that like they also don’t have the education so to be a unique content creator back to basics why doesn’t YouTube push any videos that are real? YouTubers not just AI that people just choked on their learning channels that people are saying you’ve got to watch the seven things to improve your your content creating you watch a bunch of these all the frigging same so when I upload the video doesn’t get pushed to many people I think my biggest impressions were round about 3000 my biggest I get expect to go on YouTube when you’re only getting so many impressions so to me the YouTube are not allowing content creators that are unique to push their videos if you push the new YouTubers videos so they start getting in the monetisation they may well be able to afford a different type of technology to help them along doesn’t seem fair
2
Thanks ❤❤❤❤❤❤
4
Is this the guy responsible for the degradation of YouTube's "recommended" algorithm? AI slop is not YouTube's worst problem. It's the absolutely inane, repetitive way they serve up content.
2
❤nice
2
Some creators are smart and original but use AI avatars for many reasons: don’t want to be on camera, stutter, poor language skills, impediment, can’t find a quiet or studio-like corner to record. The viewers get a better experience. But YT may end up punishing them.
If you don’t want to partner with a channel for YPP then STOP PUTTING ADS ON THEIR CONTENT!!! You’re making money off of their backs. GREED!!!
3
Speaking of 'inauthentic'...
2
in the comments the authors gave their assessment and feedback It's a pity that the dislikes are not visible
Thanks 🙏🙏🙏 youtube
2
6:50 so you are telling me that because i created a viral content and other people stole my content and content creation style because they see my content going viral you will also strike me... mind you we do not get to choose and protect our content from being stolen or remaked so this is so off and i do not support this
2
“Templated content” is too vague. To be consistent and not burn out most creators develop a template. Otherwise the videos on their channel will be a random, inconsistent mess. This will confuse both the viewers and the algorithm.
🤔🤔🤔
1
@youtube manually stopping your trending contnet no matter your data...
1
Please point on the doll what topics are considered sensitive 😂 10:00
1
face-red-heart-shape
Remove the "Is this AI?" question. No one answers it honestly anyway. Require a clear, mandatory visual indicator (like a prominent "BUBBLE Wrapper" graphic) on all AI-generated content. Too many viewers are being tricked by AI music and manipulated in comments. The core problem: AI content isn't original creation. it's scamming people and eroding trust. It fills sidebar space with low-quality filler while offering no real productivity gains. Meanwhile, it's making creators and viewers less money, not more. This isn't about innovation. It's about protecting people from deception.
6
Needed that clarification
8
Thank you for this explanation on this. It is very helpful.
8
No explaination needed! Remove AI from the platform. As a viewer I don't want it and as a creator I don't want it.
2
It's being too critical. You say the content is repetitive and lacks significant creativity. If you say the content is annoying and doesn't create value, then why is the average watch time of the videos so high? And the audience is real, proving that the ads are reaching the right audience, and whether they're doing their job well depends on your algorithms. Why are you holding onto the channel's revenue? Sometimes the audience just likes that kind of content, and creators only look at the metrics of similar videos and produce similar ones, and that's unintentional, not deliberate. 90 days is too difficult for a channel without revenue to operate successfully.
2
4:10 is he seriously criticizing Hope For Paws?
1
Hindi
1
So... what am I ? (:
Tax 🎉🎉🎉
I have yet to see anything "high quality" made with ai 🤣 I would rather have clean water and a regular electric bill than generated fruits talking on youtube
1
BLA.. BLÁ...BLA... Não sou produtor. Mas este cara é um enrolão. Eles querem é RECEBER MUITO COM PUBLICIDADE e não pagar para os produtores. Insatisfação dos expectadores... Mentira... YT quer é aumentar o faturamento SEM PAGAR o produtor. MAS COLOCAR PUBLICIDADE DE ESTELIONATÁRIOS O YT ACEITA, eu já denunciei mais de 20 vezes mas o YT continuou colocando o anúncio. Bla. Bla. Bla
Such a scam... refusing to show content no matter the engagement likes retention. Stopping 1-10s flat and removing them from the feed. Total manaul supression. Why even make content if you are going to throttle it.
1
You need better tools to find these channels. You've been demonetizing people that were not deservant of it. Cat channels, travel channels, people that do not have mass-produced content. There's got to be a better way that you find the real perpetrators. A lot of undue stress has been caused across the creator ecosystem
1
This video is not factual. Demonitized after 12 years in the program, they never stopped running advertising.
6:02 I swear I'm listening, but y'all, I'm dying
1
Ya there's no such thing as flagging channels... it literally just happened to thise clown guys because of the quartering. There youtube channel got banned for mass reporting. So thats a blatant lie. And so manu other youtubers talk about how mass reporting does actually work and does affect channels.
1
❤❤❤❤❤ AI PERSONA'S thats fake to totally manufacture even the very words of someone. It is misleading. It can be misinformation, totally false. How is it not copyright and trademark infringement or plagiarism? I try to stop, unrecommend, block every one! Thank you for your attention to this matter.
1
he js a liar! they have huge ai artists they dont flag and push! we all know who they are
1
आप हिंदी में बात करते थे तुम हमको अच्छे से समझ में आता है आप हिंदी में वीडियो बनाए हमारे लिए
5:49 “Sometimes those videos are great” is LAUGHABLE! There have been no “great” AI videos.
3
Seeing these fake porch pirates Ai generated is very off putting. Seeing Ai generated cats in distress or some Ai cat shelter home that is supposedly built to save them. misleading us to think somebody made it to save cats in need. Also Very off putting.
1
please leave the channel to Julia or bring Lauren back !!!
1
Este contenido muy educativo, muy interesante, las políticas y los procesos bien explicados, voy para 16 años trabajando para YouTube, y solo estado una semana fuera del canal, y fue porque alguien hackeo mi canal, y estuve en el proceso de recuperación durante una semana perdí esas vistas de esta semana, pero he tratado de mantenerme en la regla todo el tiempo he tenido reclamo de autor por pistas y quizá por algún programa que presenten algún momento no de la manera adecuada, pero he tenido dos reclamaciones de en todo este tiempo, gracias por cada usted, estar dispuesto a explicar las reglas, explicar todo para que esta plataforma siga porque la gente tiene algo qué que es como la emoción de poder ser parte de YouTube, a pesar de que no reciban un pago mensual, se animan a hacer Videos.
Thank you sharing it. And explain the reason behind unauthentic content.
Thank you for breaking that down more.
so now creators have to worry about repetitive tutorials? Theres going to be alot of people confused by that.
6
0:09 thanks to the YouTube family 88 subscribers 🎉
ypp is opp in youtube world
Am I joking with you? There haven't been any views for five days, and the videos aren't getting pushed—are you messing around?
1
Just another useless update to shut our eyes from all drastic removals you do on youtube.
1
All my questions were answered in 10 minutes thanx so much
Very helpful information. Still new but I love the fact I’m learning pretty much everyday as I go!! Appreciate you and other YouTubers.
2
I appreciate this very much, sometimes in a bid to keep up or get views or get monetized, we push out videos (quantity over quality) and we lose our 'why' ...the original reason we started to tell stories here on YouTube. Thanks for this explanation, I will indeed refocus ( and also be more selective in how I use AI to assist).🙏🏿
2
Am I the only one to find his explanation very confusing? I mean, it is open to so many interpretations.
Thank you for clarifying.
1
Thank you for the information. This is very helpful. ❤
Yes I’m as new to YouTube I like the policy and I personally think that own creativity is amazing and authentic
This is really helpful! Inauthentic content was so vague, I think it was too open to interpretation. And having examples really helps.
Thank for sharing information, its very helpful❤❤❤
Watching here so I understand the policies. I keep.posting my authentic videos😘
2
I misunderstood myself. I presented one of my older videos. But after watching one of your topic I got it right now. Thank you
“Ai can actually allow people to make a lot of videos. Sometimes those videos are great” - a liar, a liar said this 0:00
All the information you have given is useless and nonsensical if you're still using your lame AI to enforce the policies on creator's channels....train your sloppy AI first, then start enforcing the policies
1
Thank you so much supporting information 🎉🎉🎉❤❤
As someone running an AI-assisted fantasy music channel, I actually found this reassuring. I write the stories and lyrics, build recurring characters, and shape each song around a narrative. AI is one of the tools I use, not the source of the creativity itself. Hearing YouTube say they still value original storytelling, regardless of the tools used, is encouraging. My takeaway wasn’t “AI is bad.” It was “cookie-cutter content is bad.” That’s exactly the direction I want to keep building in.
Thank you very much, Not only has it been helpful and informative, but it has given me an idea for my new column, "The Culture In Things." I've been wanting to write something like this for a while, but was unsure how to proceed. Your video just gave me the green light to write something positive.
I can't keep up with these changes. But trying to improve and adapt
Wow, being authentic is the best but sometimes, creators are unclear of who their audience is, with this breakdown, We can be better creators
1
Hello my friends, thank you very much for this detailed explanation. I hope you are always well. Thank you once again for what you provide to the owner of the content. I love the YouTube platform, all of its calibrations, I love the system, and I work with all my effort to arrive one day.
1
Thank you YouTube
Very nice moment thanks for YouTube team ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I appreciate the clarity
1
riiiight. So 100 creators can make very basic videos about how to do this and that on Youtube (VID IQ etc) and it is fine yet someone can create a very educational video using their own ideas + AI to make it better than they ever could and that is deemed as content farming.
1
Thanks for this episode. Thanks💕💕
1
Thanks for doing what you do!
2
Just wanted to reach out and say thank you for the help i’m guessing that you reached out to help me with my issue on reporting another channel (from my comment earlier). I finally got a response. It’s so frustrating. Thank you.
Great info! Thanks for sharing.
Thank you you tube ❤
thanks for informations...💗💗💗💗
Thankyou you tube my family 🙏🙏
This is a wonderful video, it explains things very well. I think people who don't watch it are missing out because they're in too much of a hurry and have too little time to create content.
"Inauthentic content" is an opinion. The very high bar for monetization just got even higher. How long do you expect us to do this for free? I eat meals at my computer. I sleep at my computer. My entire world revolves around the things I create with my computer. And when I see views on my video DECREASE, it truly breaks my heart.
2
I use AI for the scripts and VOs used in our videos. That's it, I believe in our concept. its time will come eventually for sure. face-blue-wide-eyes
Blah... blah... blah... I'm not a creator. But this guy is full of it. What they really want is to MAKE BIG MONEY FROM ADS without paying the creators. Viewer dissatisfaction... Yeah, right... YT just wants to boost revenue WITHOUT PAYING the creator. BUT YT IS FINE WITH RUNNING ADS FOR SCAMMERS; I’ve reported them over 20 times, yet YT kept showing the ad. Blah. Blah. Blah.
Thank you for sharing🎉❤
Very useful and fruitful ❤❤
Thank you 🎉❤
Thanks
معلومات مفيدة جدا👍
Thank you ❤
Very helpful from Yt team 😍❤
Thank you🎉🎉🎉🎉
Thanks 😊
Allright
Lots of Iformation thank you
Rene, please bring back Strawberry Rene
Nice vido❤❤❤
Ayyy reaction channels are in the clear lets gooooo!
6:07 distressing content!
Despite the policies, gather here to add 1 💯
Nice ❤❤
Not sure is anything can happen to someone who false reports creators or worse comments on videos threatening the creators of that video that they will report them and encourage others to report the creators videos. At least take away commenting for a few days. It happened to us that someone threatened they will delete our channel because on a video about activating a license, I was not giving them my license key but telling them this is how to do it and for sure you will have to use your own license key. Nothing happened but I’m sure they tried. Edit also nice summer fruit theme!
Sir one question why my videos is not getting views from other countries 😢
Cool
I'm really worried about my channel. Being a small YouTuber isn't easy, but I'm trying not to give up. I sincerely wish every small YouTuber success, growth, and the opportunity to achieve their dreams. ❤️
hi
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
wow . very helpfull video
❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🤘🕊🌷❤️❤️👍
Looks like you're against AUDIO BASED content and GACHA LIFE (GACHA STUDIO too)
So beautiful
1
สวัสดีครับได้ความรู้ดีมากเลยครับ😊😊😊😊😊😊❤❤
চ্যানেলের নাম ROUHANI ISLAMIC MEDIA
1
Let's grow together
Blah... blah... blah... I'm not a creator. But this guy is full of it. What they really want is to MAKE BIG MONEY FROM ADS without paying the creators. Viewer dissatisfaction... Yeah, right... YT just wants to boost revenue WITHOUT PAYING the creator. BUT YT IS FINE WITH RUNNING ADS FOR SCAMMERS; I’ve reported them over 20 times, yet YT kept showing the ad. Blah. Blah. Blah.
Top is selected, so you'll see featured comments