Vidya Gopalan, known as @queencitytrends, often shares parenting, lifestyle and fashion content with her nearly 5 million followers
A recent video sparked backlash after she cleaned out her daughter's closet without consulting her about donations
Gopalan has faced criticism before for her parenting choices, including her strict summertime rules for her children
Known to her nearly 5 million followers as @queencitytrends, 40-year-old viral mom-fluencer Vidya Gopalan primarily creates parenting, lifestyle and fashion content. Her videos often feature her husband Rakesh, whom viewers know online as Pookesh, and their two children: Sahana, 14, and Shaan, 11.
Gopalan is no stranger to sparking controversy over her parenting decisions, and a recent viral video on donating her kids' clothes is no different. The content creator began the clip by warning her children about her actions, prompting an immediate exclamation from her daughter, Sahana: "We need more clothes, not less!" Vidya laughed and fired back, "You guys act like we don't buy anything."
Vidya explained that trying to clean and organize with the children around is "too much," so she chooses to wait until they leave before she starts sorting. However, once the kids actually saw the cleaned-out closet, they appeared to calm down and acknowledged that her plan did make the space look nice.
Advertisement
Advertisement
She captioned the video, "When moms walk in with a trash bag 💕don't worry she will look over everything to make sure I didn't get rid of something she loves 😉." Nevertheless, some users in the comments section disagreed with her parenting choice, pointing out that the clothes selected for donation should be chosen by the tween herself instead of her mother.
Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
"These kids get no privacy in any aspect of their lives. So sad," one commenter wrote.
"You need to have respect for her and let her chose what SHE wants to get rid of 😫," another added.
Advertisement
Advertisement
"yeah that's insane. if my mom did this to me I would be livid," wrote a third.
These remarks are only a small fraction of the more than 1,000 comments left on the post, the majority of which express criticism toward Vidya's parenting.
The video ends with Vidya panning the camera toward Sahana, who is seated next to three completely stuffed trash bags of clothing, as she asks, "Where should we donate this all… me?"
Social media influencer known as “Celebrity Medical Esthetician” and “Trad Wife” arrested for shoplifting over $2,000 worth of merchandise from a Jersey Shore ShopRite.
Jeana M. DiCarlo, 35, charged with third-degree shoplifting after being caught on store surveillance video attempting to leave without paying for items valued at $548.80.
DiCarlo had committed similar shoplifting crimes on multiple occasions in May, with a total estimated value of stolen items reaching $2,489, and had previously been arrested for shoplifting at a Middletown Target store.
Jeana M. DiCarlo
Social media influencer with pages called "Celebrity Medical Esthetician" and "Trad Wife" becomes a hot topic after a video of her arrest for shoplifting at a Jersey Shore ShopRite is released.
Jeana M. DiCarlo, 35, of Middletown, was arrested after Middletown Police Officer James Courtney responded to the ShopRite located at 1500 Route 35 at 5:16 p.m. on Friday due to a report of a female stealing on the premises, according to the Middletown Police report and the body camera video released by Transparency Bodycam.
DiCarlo has more than 30,900 followers on her Instagram account @jgloskincaree, where she describes herself as a "Celebrity Medical Esthetician," business owner, a "Mom of 5," and a "FireWife". Her posts contain information about her skincare routine, her five children (a baby boy that she claims to have conceived via in vitro fertilization after five girls), and her firefighter husband who works with the FDNY.
Advertisement
Advertisement
According to the criminal complaint, store employees said that DiCarlo tried to leave the store with stolen merchandise. The value of the items was estimated at $548.80. Based on evidence from store surveillance video and the store's decision to press charges against her, DiCarlo was arrested, handcuffed, and transported to Middletown Township Police headquarters. She was charged with third-degree shoplifting and released on her own recognizance until her court appearance.
During the investigation, it was found that DiCarlo had committed similar crimes on May 8, May 17, and May 31, with a total value of the items of $1,940.20. Thus, the total estimated value for all four incidents became $2,489.
Court documents quoted by Transparency Bodycam showed that on July 19, 2023, DiCarlo had already been arrested for shoplifting at a Middletown Target store.
In total, DiCarlo was charged with third-degree shoplifting for items costing between $500 and $749.99, according to court documents. As of press time, the charge appeared to have been amended to disorderly persons shoplifting of items valued under $200. In both cases, court dates are set for August 3 in Middletown Municipal Court.
The video's release generated online comments.
Advertisement
Advertisement
"I have secondhand embarrassment for her, and I've never stolen anything in my life. Yikes," was written in one of the comments.
"Wonder what the firefighter hubby thinks… Nothing but trash with cash thinking she's untouchable…" – the other one followed.
The third comment read as follows: "I have 5 kids lol… I may have more gray hair and wrinkles, but 'forgetting' to pay… nah… Where are you finding these chicks on body cam? Did you search for hotties?"
This Mom is Teaching Her 2-Year-Old Daughter to Embrace Boredom: ‘My Goal Isn’t to Constantly Entertain Her’ (Exclusive)
Aliyah Norales tells PEOPLE why she avoids handing her daughter a phone or tablet in public and how she’s teaching curiosity, independence and presence instead
Ashley Vega
4 min read
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google.
A TikTok showing Aliyah Norales' daughter calmly entertaining herself without an iPad sparked a conversation among parents about screen time
Norales says her family isn't screen-free but intentionally avoids giving their daughter personal devices or using screens as a coping tool
The 26-year-old stay-at-home mom tells PEOPLE how she's encouraging curiosity, independence and healthy technology habits for both her daughter and herself
When Aliyah Norales sat down to fill out paperwork at an appointment, she expected an ordinary afternoon with her 2-year-old daughter.
Instead, a quick TikTok showing the little girl quietly taking in the world around her without an iPad sparked a conversation among millions of parents about screen time, boredom and what childhood looks like today.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The text on the video read, "POV: I never did screen time in public so this is my non iPad kid while I fill out paperwork for my appointment."
But Norales, 26, is quick to clarify that her family isn't anti-screen. "I wouldn't consider us screen-free. We're anti-iPad," the stay-at-home mom and content creator tells PEOPLE. "We don't give our daughter personal screens like phones or tablets, especially when we're out, but she does watch movies and TV at home."
Long before she became a mom, Norales imagined raising her daughter without screens altogether. That changed once she started building a family of her own and realized movies weren't something she wanted to eliminate, but something she wanted to experience together.
"Film and television are a meaningful part of our family culture and something my husband and I genuinely appreciate as an art form," she says. "I believe the value of screen time isn't just about whether children watch something, but how it's consumed. When it's intentional, shared, and thoughtfully chosen, it can create connection, spark imagination, and become part of the stories and memories a family shares."
Advertisement
Advertisement
The difference, she says, is that screens aren't the answer when her daughter is restless or bored.
Instead, Norales has spent years making everyday moments feel like opportunities to learn, something as simple as talking through what she's doing or inviting her daughter to pay attention to what's happening around them.
Aliyah Norales and her daughter Credit: Aliyah Norales
"I've narrated our day to my daughter since she was born," she says. "Rather than creating separate entertainment, I invite her into what I'm already doing and explain it as we go." Whether they're waiting at an appointment or running errands, she says her daughter is encouraged to observe, explore and satisfy her own curiosity instead of reaching for a device.
That philosophy extends to Norales' own habits, too. As a content creator, she acknowledges that spending time on her phone is part of her job, but she wants her daughter to understand the difference between working and mindless scrolling.
Norales uses a Brick device to lock distracting apps and often leaves her phone in another room, adding that if her daughter sees her filming or editing, she'll explain, "Mommy is working." If she catches herself scrolling without a purpose, though, "I make a point to put my phone away because that's not the habit I want to model for her."
Choosing not to hand over a phone during errands doesn't mean every outing is easy. Norales admits there are times she understands why other parents do it, but she's found that involving her daughter in the task at hand usually works better for their family.
"I do occasionally envy parents who can hand their child a phone and have them sit quietly while they run errands," she says. "The biggest difference with our approach is that it requires more work and intentionality on my end."
Advertisement
Advertisement
At the grocery store, she'll ask her daughter to help put items in the cart, ask for her opinion or simply talk through her thoughts out loud. "My goal isn't to constantly entertain her," she adds. "It's to keep her engaged and help her learn from the world around her."
Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
Norales isn't interested in telling other parents how they should raise their children. But for anyone hoping to rely on screens a little less, she says the biggest shift might be learning to sit with the uncomfortable moments instead of immediately trying to fix them.
"I'm not an expert, and I think every family has to find what works best for them," she says. "One small change I would suggest is welcoming boredom and not making screens the default option. Give your child the opportunity to figure out what to do before stepping in to entertain them."
Advertisement
Advertisement
She adds that she's still learning alongside her daughter, but for now, slowing down, turning on music and simply being present is what's working for their family.
Pro Organizers Never Let These Things Pile Upd3sign - Getty Images
It's easy for clutter piles to build up in the home. One often-overlooked source: Those things you bring home but aren't sure what to do with. Organizers say the solution is to get rid of these items first, before they have a chance to pile up. Examples might include a promotional tote bag you got at a community event, small party favors from a friend's baby shower, or a flyer from that new restaurant down the street. Rather than let these items linger on the entryway table for weeks while you decide what to do with them, experts say it's best to either find a home for them or toss them as soon as you get home. Making the choice ASAP can reduce decision fatigue and keep your surfaces clutter-free. It also ensures you don't go "clutter blind" and forget about the items altogether.
Below, organizing experts share the things they always get rid of as soon as they get home, from unneeded receipts to unwanted hand-me-downs. If you're looking for more inspiration on what to declutter from your space, read up on the things professional organizers say most people keep way too long.
1) Kids' schoolwork
Photo credit: Westend61 - Getty Images
By sorting through schoolwork immediately, you'll make things easier for yourself and your kids in the future. "Too many times I have helped people who have been burdened with their childhood life's work instead of being blessed with a concise box of extra special pieces," says Cate Adams, professional organizer and founder of The House Half Full Professional Organizing. "I quickly sort through to see if there are any gems worth saving, and then the rest goes into the recycling."
2) Open envelopes
Photo credit: Olga Pankova - Getty Images
Keeping sentimental cards is sweet, but the envelopes are unnecessary. "We normally toss the envelope in with the card out of laziness, not for practical purposes," says Meghan Cocchiaro, a certified professional organizer and founder of Organized by Meg. Tossing it at the door halves the amount of paper you're keeping.
It's easy to tell yourself you'll use all those mini face washes, perfumes, and hot sauces, but in reality, they'll sit in a drawer for years. "Unless I know I'll use them within a week, I put free promotional samples straight into the recycling," says Judith Clarkson, master KonMari consultant and professional organizer at Life Sorted. "Just because they're free doesn't mean they should take up valuable space in my home."
4) Party favors
Photo credit: Maki Nakamura - Getty Images
Advertisement
Advertisement
Similar to free samples, consider how likely you or your kids are to actually use these items. "Oftentimes, goodie bags are filled with cheap plastic trinkets and off-brand candies that taste like wax," says Megan Barnhart, professional organizer and founder of Barnhart Home. "After attending an event, I always do a quick sort and purge of the goodies." Many can go right in the trash.
5) Dry cleaner hangers
Photo credit: Norman Posselt - Getty Images
If you don't get rid of these immediately, they'll stack up fast. "They rarely match my closets or add value to my wardrobe system, so I discard them," says Christina Lee, professional organizer and co-founder of Graceful Spaces Organizing. Fun fact: You can often return them to the dry cleaner if they're in good condition.
6) Unwanted hand-me-downs
Photo credit: Kseniya Ovchinnikova - Getty Images
"You can quickly get rid of items that were 'forced' upon you by others, such as hand-me-downs or other clutter that they were decluttering from their own lives and now represents clutter in yours," says Meghan Cocchiaro. Donate the items if they're in good condition, but don't feel guilty about tossing them.
7) Empty shipping boxes
Photo credit: Javier Zayas Photography - Getty Images
Don't let a haphazard mountain of shipping boxes stack up by the door. "It would amaze you how many empty shipping boxes I come across when organizing homes," says Megan Barnhart. "I hear, 'I may need to send the item back,' often." She suggests setting a certain number of boxes to keep and store, but to break them down first so they take up less space. You'll always have a box for returns, but things won't get out of hand.
8) Receipts
Photo credit: Tetra Images - Getty Images
Advertisement
Advertisement
You're probably not returning your groceries, so you can safely toss the receipt immediately. "That goes for all products you 100 percent know you will not return, including food, snacks, and clothing or shoes you are sure of or that you know you have an electronic copy of if you end up needing it," says Meghan Cocchiaro.
Princess Diana's wardrobe was iconic—and, according to her former royal butler Paul Burrell, she sold some of her pieces to thrift shops.
The reason she did so is surprising and has ties to her sons, Prince William and Prince Harry.
"Some dresses were never destined for auctions or museums," Burrell wrote in his book A Royal Duty.
Long before Princess Diana's famous Christie's auction in June 1997—just two months before her untimely death—the former Princess of Wales was selling her old clothing differently.
That's according to Diana's former royal butler Paul Burrell, who wrote in his book A Royal Duty that, when it came to the princess's iconic wardrobe, "Some dresses were never destined for auctions or museums."
Princess Diana in London on June 3, 1997. Credit: Getty
Instead, Burrell wrote (per Marie Claire), some of Diana's designer clothes were taken to thrift stores in Knightsbridge or Chelsea "where they would be handed over in exchange for cash when sold."
Advertisement
Advertisement
It was Diana's decision to sell some items of clothing in order "to raise spending money for her, because royals rarely carry hard currency," Burrell added.
Princess Diana, Prince Harry, and Prince William in September 1995. Credit: Getty
"By generating cash, she could spend it as she wished without trace, and take [her sons Prince] William and [Prince] Harry to the cinema or to McDonald's," he continued.
Burrell said of William and Harry, "In the biggest paradox of their opulent royal life, the young princes were fascinated by money and how the Queen [Elizabeth]'s face adorned every note of every denomination."
"A £10 note was a 'brown Granny' and a £50 note was a 'pink Granny,'" Burrell wrote, nodding to William and Harry's nickname for their grandmother, the queen. "When the princess handed out money, it was a joy to watch the boys jumping up and down, clutching the notes, invariably a 'pink Granny.'"
Princess Diana, Prince Harry, and Prince William. Credit: Getty
As to the aforementioned Christie's auction in June 1997—an idea from William to sell Diana's clothes to raise money for charity—The New York Times reported that the event brought in $3.25 million for 79 cocktail and evening dresses. This averaged more than $41,000 per dress, well above Christie's estimated $5,000 value for each dress.
Advertisement
Advertisement
The auction benefited cancer and AIDS charities and was attended by more than 1,100 people, no one, of course, knowing that by the end of the summer, the event would be even more poignant after Diana died in a Paris car crash at just 36 years old on August 31.
Princess Diana with Lord Hindlip viewing items that she put up for auction at Christie's. Credit: Getty
Lord Hindlip, the auctioneer and chairman of Christie's International, said Christie's took in about twice what he had expected, per The New York Times. Christie's International's creative director, Meredith Etherington-Smith, visited Diana's home at Kensington Palace to look at Diana's dresses, and was taken aback by "quite a large room" jammed with clothes.
"The princess said, 'You can see my problem,'" Etherington-Smith said at the time. "I said, 'I certainly can.'"
During the auction in New York City in June 1997, Diana remained in London, but asked that Christie's send her the results overnight. "She wants a fax so that her butler can bring it with the breakfast tray," Etherington-Smith said.
Princess Diana at the pre-auction party for her Christie's auction in June 1997. Credit: Getty
Items from Diana's closet still go up for auction today, nearly 30 years after her death. Last summer, one of the largest auctions of Diana's belongings took place in Los Angeles, where 300 items hit the auction block.
Advertisement
Advertisement
"I don't know if it's wrong to say this, but in some people's minds, she's like a saint," said Elizabeth Emanuel, who designed Diana's 1981 wedding dress with her then-husband David. Speaking to People, Elizabeth said, "They want to touch her, they want anything that was part of her. She was such a beautiful person, such a radiant soul—they don't want to let her go."
"I can't think of anybody else that this would apply to, who was like her and remembered by so many people," she added.
Princess Diana in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1997. Credit: Getty
One item that will never go up for auction or for sale? Diana's winter coats. That's according to Martin Nolan, cofounder and executive director of Julien's Auctions, which put on 2025's "Princess Diana's Style & A Royal Collection" auction.
"We learned through this how generous Diana was, always giving items," he told People. "And you never see a coat from Diana come to auction, because she used to get her butler or her staff or friends to drive around London, [in] January, February, [in the] freezing cold."
"She'd find homeless people, and she would give her coats away," Nolan said. "That's how she was—without any spectacle or whatever."
I’m 61 and I just noticed I’m barely in thirty years of family photos — I was always the one taking them, and I’ve been thinking about what else I quietly archived myself out of
Bolde Team
7 min read
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google.
A woman reflects on her absence in family photos over the years, realizing she was always the one behind the camera capturing moments but rarely in the frame.
She acknowledges that while some of this was due to societal expectations and habits, she also played a role in not being present in the family photographs.
The woman decides to change this pattern by actively asking to be included in photos with her family, recognizing the importance of being present in the visual record of their lives.
I've been meaning to organize our family photos for about fifteen years. Four shoeboxes, two albums nobody ever finished, three drawers, and about nine thousand pictures on my phone, going back to whenever I got my first one that took decent pictures.
I finally started on it this spring.
And there was so much in there. We were lucky, and I don't say that lightly.
My son graduating from medical school, grinning under that ridiculous hood. My daughter's wedding, the whole tent of it. Our twenty-fifth anniversary, on the coast, both of us pink from the sun.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Then, further back, the small stuff, which turned out to be the stuff I sat with longest.
Birthdays in the old kitchen with the yellow counters. Both of the kids on the driveway on the first day of school, backpacks nearly as big as they were. My son in a phase where he refused to be photographed without his goggles on.
I went through box after box, year after year. And somewhere around the third one, I noticed something I couldn't stop noticing.
I'm barely in any of it.
Not gone from life. I was there for every bit of it. Gone from the record of it.
I was the one holding the camera
A close-up of a middle-aged woman with short blonde hair and blue eyes, gazing thoughtfully into the distance. She is wearing a light pink top and appears to be deep in thought.
It didn't take me long to work out how it happened, and there's nobody to blame in the story.
Advertisement
Advertisement
I was the one who said it. Everyone, get in, come on, two minutes.
You know how that goes. The groaning. My son at fifteen refusing to stand next to his sister.
My husband checking his watch, not unkindly, just already halfway to the car. Somebody's eyes closed, and we do it again.
I'd line them up on the steps, back up a few feet, count them down, and take the picture. Then we'd all go do whatever we were going to do.
And the thing is, if I didn't do that, it didn't happen. Nobody else was going to think of it. Not because they didn't love each other. It simply never crossed anyone's mind that a moment was passing and somebody ought to keep it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
So for thirty years, I was in the room for every single photograph and standing four feet outside every single one.
Occasionally, somebody would say, "Want me to take one with you in it?" and I'd wave it off.
We were already late. I hadn't done my hair. It was easier to keep going than to hand over the phone and explain which button.
There are exceptions, though. I am in the wedding pictures. I'm in the graduation ones, and the portraits we did at a studio in 1998 with everyone in matching blue.
All of those have one thing in common: Somebody else was doing the photographing, usually somebody paid to. The only reliable way I got into my own family's pictures was to hire a stranger to think of it.
What else did I archive myself out of?
That's the question that got hold of me, sitting on the guest bed with the boxes.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Because once I saw the shape of it, I couldn't stop finding it.
Every holiday for three decades, I planned. The lists, the timing, the who-can't-eat-what. And in the pictures from those days, there's a table full of people eating, and I'm not at it, because I was in the kitchen getting the next thing out.
The trips. I booked them, I packed for four people, and I knew where the passports were. I have almost no pictures of myself on any of them.
The birthdays. I made the cakes. Which means that in thirty years of birthday photos, I am never once in a picture with a cake I made. I'm the arm at the edge of the frame, setting it down.
Advertisement
Advertisement
And it went past what a camera could have caught anyway. I was the one who knew my kids' friends' names, and which friends had stopped being friends.
Shoe sizes. Which one couldn't have peanuts and which one just didn't like them. Dentist in the fall, physicals in August.
When their grandmother's birthday was, and the card in the mail a week early with my handwriting in it and both kids' names signed by me.
There's no photograph of any of that either, and that's what stayed with me. All of it existed because I was doing it, and none of it left a mark that says I was there.
It wasn't only me
For a while, I thought this was a private failing. Some shyness in me, or some habit I'd let run too long without checking it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
It isn't only me, and it isn't only my generation.
Years ago, a woman wrote about missing from her own family's pictures, and it went everywhere. Hundreds of thousands of women read it and went and looked at their own albums and found the same hole.
Hundreds of thousands of women don't find the same hole in their albums by coincidence. That's not a quirk. That's how the job is built.
Whoever does the arranging is almost never in the arrangement. And in most houses of my era, and plenty of houses now, the person doing the arranging is the wife.
Mine was a little different, though, and I think the difference matters. A lot of the women in that wave were staying out of photos because of how they looked. Postpartum, tired, not wanting the evidence.
Advertisement
Advertisement
That wasn't me. I wasn't hiding from the camera. I was operating it. Which is plainer, and somehow sits worse.
But before I let myself off entirely, nobody banned me from those pictures. My husband would have taken one any time I asked, and would have been glad to, and would be baffled to learn I'd counted them up.
I didn't ask. Asking felt like making a fuss over myself, and there was always something else to do.
And I'll admit the other half of it. Being the one who handled everything was a role I was good at. I liked being the one who remembered. There was a small pride in it that I'm only now seeing the price of.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Some of this was done to me. Some of it I did.
What I do now
I can't be put back into thirty years of photographs. There's no fixing it, and I've stopped picturing a version where it went differently.
What I can do is stop repeating it, which turns out to be an ordinary and slightly awkward practice rather than a grand change.
When my son comes over with the kids, I hand him my phone. Take one of me and them on the rug. He always says sure, like it's nothing, because to him it is nothing.
At dinners, I get in. I don't hang back near the doorway to be the one who takes it. I sit down and let somebody else figure it out.
Advertisement
Advertisement
I asked for one at Easter, standing with my daughter by the car, and she looked pleased in a way that stayed with me for a week.
It isn't the same as having the old ones. But I keep doing it.
I'll say one more thing about the boxes. My own mother is hardly in them either. A handful from her wedding, a few from when she was a girl, and then almost nothing for forty years of being somebody's mother.
I never once wondered about that until this spring. It looked normal to me, the way a thing looks normal when you've never seen it any other way.
And it isn't for me, in the end. I'm not going to be sitting on a bed one day, going through boxes looking for myself. My kids will be.
When they do, I want them to find their mother in there, and not only the evidence of what she organized.
Though there's one more thing I can't shake. My daughter is thirty-four now. Two little ones, a phone with thousands of pictures on it.
She's in almost none of them.
So I've started taking them for her. Her on the floor with the baby. Her at the sink with the little one on her hip. She hasn't asked me why. One day, she'll understand.
Editor's Note: "As Told to Bolde" stories are inspired by reader submissions, interviews, and accounts shared with our editorial team. Details are often changed, combined, or dramatized, and our editors use AI tools in the writing process. See our Editorial Policy.
20 Pieces of Clothing Older Women should AvoidSome styles never age — but others? Well, they might be aging you. Discover 20 fashion pieces that could be adding years instead of flair.