Great example of people claiming they “saw” the footage and that they “spoke” to Jack about it, they dance around the claim, they don’t outright state they saw a video by any title that has been speculated to have had in any given site online, they don’t even outright claim to have seen anything graphic in this version of Jack’s footage, or if it’s even the same footage that’s readily available online, nor do they even give much detail on what Jack had to say.

Nobody has discredited Jack’s work as a journalist, he is praised and celebrated for it, he put his life on the frontline of a terrorist attack to record and preserve the reality of what had happened and was happening as it all unfolded, but the reality of it is that Jack didn’t record LSM/MTTJ or any other variation of what the footage is known as, he was physically not there at the time it happened, it would of been completely impossible for him to be the cameraman, the insinuation of it is ridiculous, and quite outrageous that it’s still been debated almost 24 years after the events! If anything, I do believe he might of captured the aftermath of victims from the crash and people who either accidentally fell or jumped off the buildings, I mean, maybe instead of blurring the footage as the unknown man suggested, he, or whoever released the footage, might of opted to remove it altogether, and that could very much explain the jump cuts.