>>950530148>Fuck off with your revisionist history. It was over 95% whiteyes. 95% white, but also made of Italians who arrived in the 1st century and created an entire national infrastructure.
and then German immigrants who settled in the power vacuum after theri departure in the 5th century.
and the Irish immigrants who settled Dal Riata in the 6th century, bringing their religion with them.
and white immigrants who literally invaded in the 9th century, and demanded the wealth of the nation not to keep burning those nice valuable churches.
And their french decendants, who invaded again in 1066, and forcibly removed the ruling class of anglo-saxon rulers.
then the Flemish who on immigrating to England in the 12th century because of flooding in their home countries, were sent to Wales where they replaced the native Welsh by force.
and then there was the immigrant wave of 1348 as they fled from the plague in Italy, and settled in Bristol, Southhampton and Portsmouth as merchant traders.
And then the immigrant Hugenots who fled from the wars of religion in France and Burgundy the 17th century, bringing "british" food like Fish and Chips.
And then the late 17th century arrival of some 40,000 Indians, of various geographical areas that would cover modern India, Ceylon, Pakistan and Bangladesh, as a result of the British influence on India, with up to 1/4 of entire ships crews returning to the UK being Indian - a growth which only grew over the following century and a half with the rise of the East India Company.
and then the Irish migrations following the famine there in the 19th century.
so which part of the "revisionism" offends you, is it just the little bits with too much melanin for a racist cunt like yourself to tolerate?
