Jump to content
We owe you an explanation.
June 18: An important update for readers in Japan.

You deserve an explanation, so please don't skip this 1-minute read. It's Thursday, June 18. Our fundraiser won't last long, but fewer people are seeing our message this month and we might not hit our goal. If you've lost count of how many times you've visited Wikipedia this year, we hope that means it's given you at least ¥300 of knowledge. If everyone who finds Wikipedia useful gave ¥300, we'd hit our goal in a few hours.

It's been 25 years and Wikipedia is still free. It's still created by people, not machines, and we don't run ads or put up paywalls because we're not here to make a profit off your attention. In other words, it's still the internet we were promised.

Less than 2% of our readers donate, so if you've never given and Wikipedia has provided you with at least ¥300 worth of knowledge, donate today. If you are undecided, remember any contribution helps.

Proud host of Wikipedia and other free knowledge projects
How often would you like to donate?
Support Wikipedia year-round
Thanks for your generous support
Please select an amount (JPY)
The average donation in Japan is around ¥800.
  • Preferred Amount
Please select a payment method
Please select an amount (minimum ¥154)
We cannot accept donations greater than 3850000 JPY through our website. Please contact our major gifts staff at benefactors@wikimedia.org.
Please select a payment method
Can we follow up and let you know if we need your help again? The support and advice we get from donors in Japan is priceless, but many donors don't let us stay in touch. Will you commit today, this Thursday, to staying in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation?
Sorry to hear that. We don't email often; would you consider changing your mind?
Thanks for changing your mind! We’ll respect your inbox.
Your information is handled in accordance with our donor privacy policy, and each email you receive will include easy unsubscribe options.
Please select an email option
Almost done: Please, make it  monthly.
Monthly support is the best way to ensure that Wikipedia keeps thriving.
How would you like to be reminded?
Whether you give now or later, any contribution helps. We can send you an email or text message reminder to join the 2% of readers who donate.
🎉 Thank you for donating recently! 🎉
Your support means the world to us. We'll hide banners in this browser for the rest of our campaign.
Where your donation goes
Accountability and transparency are core values at the Wikimedia Foundation. We manage funds and resources to ensure that every contribution supports our mission. We have earned the Platinum Seal of Transparency from Candid (formerly GuideStar), and Charity Navigator awarded us its highest rating. You can read our most recent annual report for more information about our financial health.
45% $85.4M Technology 32% $60.7M Support 12% $22.8M Fundraising 11% $20.9M General $189.7M Total Funding
45% Investment in Technology

Nearly half of our budget goes toward supporting the technology that powers Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. We are constantly working to enhance the user experience for both contributors and readers, improve site security, and ensure reliable access to our websites globally. This infrastructure and product support sustain one of the top ten most visited websites in the world, all at a fraction of the cost of popular for-profit websites.

32% Support for Volunteers

The global reach of Wikimedia projects is made possible by the hard work of volunteers from across the globe. We provide grants, legal support, and other resources to help build vibrant volunteer communities. Additionally, we promote community engagement through outreach initiatives and advocate for the growth and protection of free knowledge.

12% Allocation to Fundraising Efforts

Donor support is crucial to sustaining Wikipedia and our other free knowledge endeavors. Our team is committed to efficient and effective fundraising throughout the year, ensuring that every contribution helps advance our mission.

11% General and Administrative Expenses

Operational costs are essential for the smooth management and governance of the Wikimedia Foundation. These expenses help us recruit top talent and support staff around the world, empowering them to carry out the mission of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Mongolian idiocy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Mongolian idiot)

The obsolete medical terms Mongolian idiocy and Mongolism referred to a specific type of mental deficiency, associated with the genetic disorder now known as Down syndrome. The obsolete term for a person with this syndrome was Mongolian idiot.

In the 21st century, those terms are no longer used as medical terminology; they are deemed unacceptable, offensive and a slur towards those with Down syndrome.[1] The terminology change was brought about both by scientific and medical experts,[2] as well as people of Asian ancestry,[2] including those from Mongolia.[3]

The stand-alone term "idiot" itself has a similar history of meaning and connotation change.[4]

"Idiot" as a former medical term

[edit]

The word "idiot" was previously a technical term used in both legal and psychiatric contexts for some type of profound intellectual disability, wherein the person's developmental stage was considered to be two years or less. Along with terms like "moron", "imbecile", and "cretin", "idiot" has become a classical description of diminished mental capacity in legal, medical and psychiatric terms.

History

[edit]

John Langdon Down first characterized what is now known as Down syndrome as a distinguishable form of mental disability in 1862, and in a more widely published report in 1866.[5][6][7] Due to his perception that these children shared facial similarities with the populations that German physician Johann Friedrich Blumenbach described as the "Mongolian race", Down used the term "mongoloid" in his characterisation of these patients.[8][2]

The term continued its usage into the 20th century. A study published in 1908 by W. Bertram Hill was titled Mongolism and its Pathology.[9] The term "Mongolism" was used by English psychiatrist and geneticist Lionel Penrose as late as 1961.

F. G. Crookshank published a pseudoscientific book in 1924 titled The Mongol in Our Midst which suggested that the syndrome was due to genetic traits literally inherited from Mongoloid races.

Rock band Devo released a song titled "Mongoloid" in 1977, describing a man with Down syndrome.

A few languages retained the colloquialism "Mongol" to mean "idiot". Racing driver Max Verstappen called Lance Stroll a "Mongol" after a collision in practice ahead of the 2020 Portuguese Grand Prix.[10]

Deprecation of the term

[edit]

In 1961, genetic experts wrote a joint letter to the medical journal The Lancet which read:

It has long been recognized that the terms Mongolian Idiocy, Mongolism, Mongoloid, etc. as applied to a specific type of mental deficiency have misleading connotations. The importance of this anomaly among Europeans and their descendants is not related to the segregation of genes derived from Asians; its appearance among members of Asian populations suggests such ambiguous designations as 'Mongol Mongoloid'; increasing participation of Chinese and Japanese in investigation of the condition imposes on them the use of an embarrassing term. We urge, therefore, that the expressions which imply a racial aspect of the condition be no longer used. Some of the undersigned are inclined to replace the term Mongolism by such designations as 'Langdon Down Anomaly', or 'Down's Syndrome or Anomaly', or 'Congenital Acromicria'. Several of us believe that this is an appropriate time to introduce the term 'Trisomy 21 Anomaly', which would include cases of simple Trisomy as well as translocations. It is hoped that agreement on a specific phrase will soon crystallize once the term 'Mongolism' has been abandoned.[2][11][3][1]

In 1965, WHO resolved to abandon the term at the request of the Mongolian People's Republic.[3] The term thereafter began to fade from use, in favor of Down's syndrome, Down syndrome and Trisomy 21 disorder.

The term "Mongolian idiocy" was reported as continuing in use at least 15 years after the WHO's decision to abandon it; in his book The Panda's Thumb, published in 1980, paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould reported that the term "Mongolism" was still commonly used in the United States, despite being "defamatory" and "wrong on all counts".[12]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Jump up to: a b Rodríguez-Hernández, M. Luisa; Montoya, Eladio (2011-07-30). "Fifty years of evolution of the term Down syndrome". Lancet. 378 (9789): 402. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61212-9. ISSN 1474-547X. PMID 21803206. S2CID 8541289.
  2. ^ Jump up to: a b c d Ward, O Conor (1999). "John Langdon Down: The Man and the Message". Down Syndrome Research and Practice. 6 (1): 19–24. doi:10.3104/perspectives.94. ISSN 0968-7912. PMID 10890244.
  3. ^ Jump up to: a b c Howard-Jones, Norman (1979). "On the diagnostic term "Down's disease"". Medical History. 23 (1): 102–04. doi:10.1017/s0025727300051048. PMC 1082401. PMID 153994.
  4. ^ "The Clinical History of 'Moron,' 'Idiot,' and 'Imbecile'". merriam-webster.com.
  5. ^ Hickey, Fran; Hickey, Erin; Summar, Karen L. (2012). "Medical Update for Children With Down Syndrome for the Pediatrician and Family Practitioner". Advances in Pediatrics. 59 (1): 137–157. doi:10.1016/j.yapd.2012.04.006. ISSN 0065-3101. PMID 22789577.
  6. ^ Down, JLH (1866). "Observations on an ethnic classification of idiots". Clinical Lecture Reports, London Hospital. 3: 259–62. Retrieved 2006-07-14.
  7. ^ O Conor, Ward (1998). John Langdon Down, 1828-1896: A Caring Pioneer. Royal Society of Medicine Press. ISBN 978-1853153747.
  8. ^ Howard Reisner (2013). Essentials of Rubin's Pathology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 129–131. ISBN 978-1-4511-8132-6.
  9. ^ Sir William Osler (1909). The Quarterly Journal of Medicine. Oxford University Press. p. 49.
  10. ^ "Mongolia accuses F1's Verstappen of 'racist and derogatory' remarks". ESPN. ESPN Enterprises, Inc. October 31, 2020. Retrieved 17 August 2025.
  11. ^ Allen, G. Benda C.J. et al (1961). Lancet corr. 1, 775.
  12. ^ Gould, Stephen Jay (1980-01-01). The panda's thumb : more reflections in natural history. Norton. pp. 168. ISBN 9780393013801. OCLC 781219337.