[–] ▶ №16227889[Quote]>>16227894
Why would we dox them? They're enjoying your content.
▶ №16227894[Quote]>>16227901
>>16227889Because tcoaal is vantablack coal that's liked by the jartiest cvcks
▶ №16227900[Quote]
tcoaal is good why do you guys even hate it
▶ №16227901[Quote]>>16227903
>>16227894then why would we make a fanmade trailer of it
▶ №16227904[Quote]
Tcoal + Tadc
▶ №16227909[Quote]>>16227914>>16227922
>>16227903but that's like baiting a gay man by jerking him off
▶ №16227922[Quote]>>16227924
>>16227909No because jerking a faggot off is literally giving him what he wants. In this case it's like saying you'll jerk him off in a dark alleyway, but then whacking him with a hammer
▶ №16227924[Quote]>>16227944
>>16227922but posting the trailer is the act of jerking him off, so it'd be like jerking him off then whacking him with a hammer, either way you just jerked off a dude
▶ №16227944[Quote]>>16227945
>>16227924No because the trailer is fake. If I'd make a genuine animated movie with voice actors then yes it's jerking off a fag. But it's just going to be some vague bait that seems legitimate enough at first glance
▶ №16227945[Quote]>>16227953
>>16227944but for them to leave a positive comment the trailer would have to be good
▶ №16227953[Quote]>>16227961
>>16227945Yes, good enough to excite them and make them engage with the bait
▶ №16227961[Quote]>>16227980
>>16227953so it's like almost jerking a man off but stopping before he cums, what if they're into that? it'd still be gay
▶ №16227980[Quote]>>16227987
>>16227961No, blue-balling a fag by stopping before he busts is making a genuine movie that drops in quality closer to the end. It's like you tried but failed, either by accident or on purpose.
▶ №16227987[Quote]>>16228050
>>16227980so this is more like teasing a man until he has a boner (still gay) and then walking away?
▶ №16228050[Quote]>>16228055
>>16227987The boner isn't necessary. It's just going to be a short aislop "trailer" without a watermark. Teasing would still imply some decent effort, like engaging with the community and making more and more posts with more and more unitonic effort put into it. I'd say it's more like walking to a fag and saying "wanna see something cool? Follow me over there". The fag will probably think you'll jerk him off, but them moment he follows you, you whack him
▶ №16228055[Quote]>>16228096
>>16228050but then if it was a short aislop trailer nophono would care and we'd get no positive comments
▶ №16228096[Quote]>>16228100
>>16228055Well, before posting it, we'll curate it enough to look genuine. The key is to be vague enough to obscure anything that could potentially show it's a fake. But considering tcoaal's reputation, it'll probably attract big enough attention. The only concern is the snitches everything else is up to the tools and creativity
▶ №16228100[Quote]>>16228115
>>16228096but the official trailers aren't ais
▶ №16228106[Quote]
the fact that at least two people are debating the ethics of how this idea is comparative to jerking off a faggot is, in its own right, theatrical
▶ №16228115[Quote]>>16228121
>>16228100That's the point - we're baitng them. It'll also probably attract some big retards and gegbvlls, and the devs of the game, too. Giving us opportunities to seek put retards to troll
▶ №16228121[Quote]>>16228138
>>16228115so it's like sending ai homosexual porn into a gay person's dms?
▶ №16228138[Quote]>>16228145
>>16228121No because it's still porn. It's more of a Cheis Hansen type bait
▶ №16228145[Quote]>>16228149
>>16228138but chris hansen still talks to the pedoniggers before they meet up with the victim, does that mean you're engaging homosexuals?
▶ №16228149[Quote]>>16228153
>>16228145Yes. That's the point. Engage with them just enough to interest them
▶ №16228153[Quote]>>16228168
>>16228149but engaging homosexuals as a man is gay
▶ №16228168[Quote]>>16228187
>>16228153Gay is a sexuality. We're not engaging fags sexually. By your logic any engagement towards another is sexual
▶ №16228187[Quote]>>16228198
>>16228168no because you're engaging the man in the hopes to get him sexually excited
▶ №16228198[Quote]>>16228253
>>16228187No. I'm engaging a man in hopes of getting his attention.
▶ №16228249[Quote]>>16228725
What if instead of wasting time making a retarded bait trailer that might not even get any attention you spent the time doxing people who are already open about liking TCOAAL
▶ №16228253[Quote]>>16228267
>>16228198thats even gayer, like you might not even get the guy's attention so you're just being gay for no reason, like at least with jerking him off you know someone is getting something out of it
▶ №16228267[Quote]>>16228276
>>16228253How is getting a faggot's attention gayer than jerking him off? Saying "hey look over here" and not being heard is much better than jerking him off because why the fuck would I want to jerk him off? My point is to whack him with a hammer while nobody sees me
▶ №16228276[Quote]>>16228277
>>16228267because you're getting his attention in the hopes to jerk him off, so like there's a 50% chance that you don't even get to jerk him off, which is basically twice as gay
▶ №16228277[Quote]>>16228282
>>16228276But I don't hope to jerk him off
▶ №16228282[Quote]>>16228297
>>16228277but like if you aren't going to lead him on after getting his attention, this entire endeavor was pointless and you'd be better off just running up to him and whacking him with a hammer before he can react
▶ №16228297[Quote]>>16228312
>>16228282Which will bring attention to me
▶ №16228312[Quote]>>16228322
>>16228297yeah but so would jerking him off
▶ №16228322[Quote]>>16228327
>>16228312Which I won't do
▶ №16228327[Quote]>>16228342
>>16228322so you won't smash him with a hammer or smash him with your hand, what would you smash him with?
▶ №16228342[Quote]>>16228350>>16228481
>>16228327I WILL smash him with a hammer. I just won't jerk him off. I don't even need to make him think that I'll jerk him off, I just want to whack him because he's a faggot. But I can't do that in the open so I'll call him in a dark alleyway
▶ №16228350[Quote]>>16228412
>>16228342but if you do it in the open it sends a message to all the other faggots that if they're a faggot you'll smash them
▶ №16228412[Quote]>>16228421>>16228481
>>16228350Unfortunately, no. Faggots at this point are pretty desensitized to simple brutality, so the point of getting on faggot down would make other faggots more violent and alert, which can lead to counterattacks. In the case of one faggot, stealth is preferable. But in case of many faggots, the message must be clear and big - your faggotry is a liability. That'll send a message to them. We either do it small and quiet or loud and big.
▶ №16228421[Quote]>>16228466>>16228481
>>16228412the OP suggests that it'd be many faggots, thus it can be assumed you want to smash many faggots
▶ №16228466[Quote]
>>16228421In which case we go loud and big, thus making the bairt
▶ №16228725[Quote]
>>16228249The scope. Doing a faggot is an unfortunate event. Doxing a billion faggots is a statistic. Amd I want that statistic to reach top charts
▶ №16228736[Quote]
>>16227884 (OP)like a tcoaal sequel trailer? no normalsoi would feel comfortable replicating the style for a bait trailer
