If you defend text by text, you're giving more answer time for the other person to downplay your statements.
If you attack text by text, you're giving the illusion of having more statements to object, overwhelming the other person, maybe even having them stuck in the first one as you pile up the rest.
It goes many ways, it can also be for:
The paragraph is "well informed and put together"
The broken up part is "excited about something that seems really interesting"
dawg first is me talking about my current hyperfixation and the second is me talking about literally anything else
you don't get it I NEED TO EXPLAIN IT PROPERLY THE TISM WILL NOT ALLOW IT OTHERWISE
The defence was only addressing one point, while the attack is throwing as many as they can.
That's why it's exhausting trying to defend against an accusation.
Long paragraph responses are an attack because it can cover like 20 different subjects and come to a conclusion before the person can get a thought in. Segmented responses open the floor for the other party to at least speak. Drawn out responses create an echo chamber.
@chelikkakoyta5501