"There is no absolute truth" is itself an absolute truth.
How do you go about this? Is there absolute truth? Is absolute synonym with objective?
"people see with their eyes", could this be considered an absolute truth?
(G) is beyond my knowledge but (H) is a killer and so I agree that (B3) is false.
If (F) is a generalization of B3, does that make it a secondary truth?
By my definition:- yes.
Is the Special Function well defined
Not particularly so at present. But I prefer the idea of a set of secondary statements. The truth of such statements depend on the truth of (B3).
or is its definition circular?
I'd say that Secondary Statements are hierarchical in the patterns of parent:child relationships and since the child refers back to (depends on) the parent it is circular in that sense.
since the child refers back to (depends on) the parent it is circular in that sense.
That worries me as well - again, I think I see Russell's barber out of the corner of my eye
Interesting approach, though!
Thanks for a stimulating discussion!
