A critical review on challenges and trend of ultrapure water production process

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147254Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Reclaimed water as alternative raw water source to produce UPW is a trend.
  • Improving UPW production process is a must if using reclaimed water as raw water.
  • IX, GAC, RO and UV are ineffective to eliminate small molecular organics (e.g. urea).
  • Applying AOPs to UPW production as a supplementary unit is a new strategy.
  • Feasibility of AOPs (e.g. SR-AOPs, EO, and UV-AOPs) in UPW production is explored.

Abstract

The recent and vigorous developments in semiconductor technology strictly request better quality and large quantity of ultrapure water (UPW) for their production. It is crucial to secure a large amount of raw water for the future development of UPW production. Using reclaimed water as alternative raw water source to produce UPW is therefore considered the feasible trend and solution for sustainable use of water resources towards a common future practice in UPW production. The challenge of using reclaimed water is due to its higher content of organic pollutants, especially small molecule organic pollutants such as urea, which are difficult to remove through traditional UPW production process. Consequently, improving the existing UPW production process to meet the water standard desired in the semiconductor industry is essential. This paper reviewed the current traditional processes for removing organic matters in UPW production, including ion-exchange (IX) adsorption, granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption, reverse osmosis (RO) and ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. The potential problems in the actual UPW production process were identified when using reclaimed water as raw water source. A new strategy of applying the advanced oxidation process (AOPs) to UPW production as a supplementary unit to guarantee UPW quality was proposed. Its feasibility and research focus were then analyzed and discussed in obtaining a new solution for a future development of the UPW production process.

Introduction

Ultrapure water (UPW) is of high purity and with almost no other electrolytes except hydrogen and oxygen ions, which is usually used in the electronics industry, photovoltaic industry, and pharmaceutical industry. Calculations based on ionic mobilities yield a specific resistance of ideal UPW is 18.3 MΩ•cm at 25 °C (Singh, 2016). Hence, ordinary distilled water, reverse osmosis water, and high-purity water (resistivity ≥10.0 MΩ•cm) are not considered to be UPW (Singh, 2016). In addition, UPW must be devoid of all contaminants including pathogens, suspended solids, radioactive contaminant, inorganic compounds and organic compounds in ideal condition, so it is also called “highly refined water” (Choi and Chung, 2019; Lee et al., 2016; Singh, 2016). The ultimate goal of UPW production is to completely remove all components except water molecules, but this is virtually impossible. Hence, the specific demand for UPW in different industries determines the purity level of UPW. Among them, the purity grade of UPW used in the semiconductor industry is most stringent. Especially with the booming developments in semiconductor technology, the quality requirements of UPW in the semiconductor industry are being formulated (Lee et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019). Thus, strictly controlling the quality of the final effluent is one of the most important challenges in the current UPW production process.
In addition, because most of the manufacturing stages of electronic products involve the use of UPW, UPW represents an important and large market. For example, a semiconductor is a miniature electronic circuit which contains a multitude of transistors. Creating an integrated circuit on a 30 cm wafer requires approximately 2200 gal of water. A typical electronic product manufacturing process needs about 3 to 60 million liters of UPW per day (Lee et al., 2016). Thus, the manufacture of semiconductors is highly water intensive. Along with the development of semiconductor technology, the demand of UPW in the semiconductor industry will greatly increase, which will lead to a huge growth of the raw water demand. Therefore, how to meet a large amount of raw water demanded will be a major problem that has to be solved in UPW production. On the other hand, with rapid urbanization and population growth, water shortage is becoming more and more serious worldwide. Therefore, people have made extensive efforts to promote other water resources, such as rainwater utilization, reclaimed water utilization, seawater desalination, etc. (Charfi et al., 2017; Guo et al., 2014). Among them, reclaimed water and municipal sewage are readily available, in great quantities, and not restricted by geographical environment. These accelerate the change of raw water resource used for UPW production. Recent studies' results have shown the feasibility of using reclaimed water as raw water sources to produce UPW (Lefebvre, 2018; Wang et al., 2019), which is a feasible engineering solution to realize the sustainable utilization of water resources. For instance, Singapore's NEWater, one of that country's four national taps, is high-grade reclaimed water produced from treated effluent of sewage treatment plants utilizing membrane technology and ultraviolet disinfection. Total organic carbon (TOC) and the conductivity of NEWater are about 0.5 mg/L and 100 μm/cm, respectively, which can be employed in industries with lower UPW water quality requirements (Lefebvre, 2018; Wang et al., 2019). In general, making full use of reclaimed water to produce UPW desired in semiconductor industry can save a large quantity of tap water. Moreover, it can improve the recycled utilization rate of water resources. However, to meet the strict UPW quality of the semiconductor industry, the largest problem concerning the raw water change is probably associated with the organic compounds removal, which means the existing UPW preparation process must be improved.
This is the first paper to critically review on challenges of the existing conventional UPW production process using reclaimed water as raw water source. The paper summarizes the technical methods of removing organic matters in the traditional UPW production process and discusses the existing problems inherent in organic matter removal while suggesting the future trend of the UPW production process.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organization

Section snippets

Challenges

In UPW production, the existing processes for organic matter removal include ion-exchange (IX) adsorption, granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption, reverse osmosis (RO), ultraviolet (UV) irradiation (wavelengths at 185 nm) (Choi and Chung, 2019; Choi et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019). However, it is difficult to remove some small molecular organic compounds using these methods. Some studies have indicated that via a series of purification processes in UPW production, small molecular organic

Conventional ultrapure water production process

The UPW production system is an extremely complex process and involves many purification technologies. The conventional UPW production system mainly includes three phases: 1) pretreatment stage; 2) desalination stage; and 3) polishing stage. Due to the cumulative of the whole production system, each process will be affected by the output of the previous stage (Lee et al., 2016). Consequently, each step in the UPW production process is critical to ensure the effluent quality. Especially for the

Feasibility and trends of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in the UPW production process

To sum up, in the past the UPW production process, the combination of IX, RO, UV, and other processes have helped to improve the removal rate of organic pollutants. Nonetheless, when changing the raw water source, it is difficult to use the above processes to remove urea and make the effluent TOC meet the requirements of the semiconductor industry. How to perfect or improve the existing process to meet the strict water standards continues to be an issue of some concern. Generally, many

Conclusions and perspectives

  • (1)
    Using reclaimed water for UPW production will not only help to obtain a large amount of produced water but also achieve a sustainable utilization of water resources, which will become the trend of UPW production in the future. However, the content of organic compounds in reclaimed water is often higher than that in tap water, especially small molecular organic pollutants such as urea, which is difficult to remove through the traditional production process. To ensure the TOC concentration of

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

The work was supported by Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau of China (Project No. 18PTZWHZ00140, 20JCZDJC00380) and TG Hilyte Environment Technology (Beijing) Co., LTD. (Project No. M-P-0-181001-001).

References (98)

  • M. Cataldo Hernández et al.

    Electrochemical oxidation of urea in aqueous solutions using a boron-doped thin-film diamond electrode

    Diam. Relat. Mater.

    (2014)
  • A. Charfi et al.

    Membrane fouling by sodium alginate in high salinity conditions to simulate biofouling during seawater desalination

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2017)
  • W.-K. Cheah et al.

    Amine-functionalized mesoporous silica for urea adsorption

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2016)
  • J. Choi et al.

    Evaluation of urea removal by persulfate with UV irradiation in an ultrapure water production system

    Water Res.

    (2019)
  • J. Choi et al.

    Removal of isopropyl alcohol and methanol in ultrapure water production system using a 185 nm ultraviolet and ion exchange system

    Chemosphere

    (2016)
  • R. de Abreu Domingos et al.

    Evaluation of adsorbent and ion exchange resins for removal of organic matter from petroleum refinery wastewaters aiming to increase water reuse

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2018)
  • P. Devi et al.

    In-situ chemical oxidation: principle and applications of peroxide and persulfate treatments in wastewater systems

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • H.M.A. El-Lateef et al.

    Enhanced adsorption and removal of urea from aqueous solutions using eco-friendly iron phosphate nanoparticles

    Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

    (2019)
  • A. Fernandes et al.

    Pilot scale degradation study of 16 selected volatile organic compounds by hydroxyl and sulfate radical based advanced oxidation processes

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2019)
  • J. Goel et al.

    Removal of lead(II) by adsorption using treated granular activated carbon: batch and column studies

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2005)
  • K. Gupta et al.

    Pre-chlorination effects on fouling during microfiltration of secondary municipal wastewater effluent

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2021)
  • X. He et al.

    Degradation kinetics and mechanism of β-lactam antibiotics by the activation of H2O2 and Na2S2O8 under UV-254nm irradiation

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2014)
  • H. Humbert et al.

    Natural organic matter (NOM) and pesticides removal using a combination of ion exchange resin and powdered activated carbon (PAC)

    Water Res.

    (2008)
  • K. Ibn Abdul Hamid et al.

    Comparison of the effects of ozone, biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration and combined ozone-BAC pre-treatments on the microfiltration of secondary effluent

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2019)
  • Y. Jin et al.

    UV radiation pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) process in ultrapure water (UPW) production

    Desalination

    (2018)
  • K. Kalantari et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of N-doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their application in photocatalytic oxidation of dibenzothiophene under visible light

    Ceram. Int.

    (2016)
  • H.-I. Kim et al.

    Titanium dioxide surface modified with both palladium and fluoride as an efficient photocatalyst for the degradation of urea

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2019)
  • K. Kutschera et al.

    Photoinitiated oxidation of geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol by irradiation with 254nm and 185nm UV light

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • H. Lebik-Elhadi et al.

    Degradation of pesticide thiamethoxam by heat – activated and ultrasound – activated persulfate: effect of key operating parameters and the water matrix

    Process Saf. Environ. Prot.

    (2020)
  • H. Lee et al.

    Factors affecting the removal of isopropyl alcohol by reverse osmosis membranes for ultrapure water production

    Desalination & Water Treatment

    (2015)
  • H. Lee et al.

    Recent transitions in ultrapure water (UPW) technology: rising role of reverse osmosis (RO)

    Desalination

    (2016)
  • J.J. Lee et al.

    Ultra-low concentration of total organic carbon in ultrapure water using ion-exchange resin embedding silanized magnetic nanoparticles

    J. Environ. Sci.

    (2020)
  • Y.-C. Lee et al.

    Efficient decomposition of perfluorocarboxylic acids in aqueous solution using microwave-induced persulfate

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • O. Lefebvre

    Beyond NEWater: an insight into Singapore’s water reuse prospects

    Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health

    (2018)
  • I. Levchuk et al.

    Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) from water by ion exchange – a review

    Chemosphere

    (2018)
  • H. Lin et al.

    Enhanced performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon addition for municipal secondary effluent treatment

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2011)
  • J. Lipnizki et al.

    Water treatment: combining reverse osmosis and ion exchange

    Filtration + Separation

    (2012)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Synergistic effect of ferrate (VI)-ozone integrated pretreatment on the improvement of water quality and fouling alleviation of ceramic UF membrane in reclaimed water treatment

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2018)
  • X. Liu et al.

    Secondary effluent purification towards reclaimed water production through the hybrid post-coagulation and membrane distillation technology: a preliminary test

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2020)
  • L. Long et al.

    Removal of urea from swimming pool water by UV/VUV: the roles of additives, mechanisms, influencing factors, and reaction products

    Water Res.

    (2019)
  • X.Y. Ma et al.

    Function of a landscape lake in the reduction of biotoxicity related to trace organic chemicals from reclaimed water

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2016)
  • H. MacKeown et al.

    Removal of disinfection by-product precursors by ion exchange resins

    Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

    (2021)
  • L. Malaeb et al.

    Reverse osmosis technology for water treatment: state of the art review

    Desalination

    (2011)
  • A. Matilainen et al.

    Removal of natural organic matter from drinking water by advanced oxidation processes

    Chemosphere

    (2010)
  • L.W. Matzek et al.

    Activated persulfate for organic chemical degradation: a review

    Chemosphere

    (2016)
  • N.F.F. Moreira et al.

    Metal-free g-C3N4 photocatalysis of organic micropollutants in urban wastewater under visible light

    Appl. Catal. B Environ.

    (2019)
  • C.-H. Ooi et al.

    Conversion and characterization of activated carbon fiber derived from palm empty fruit bunch waste and its kinetic study on urea adsorption

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2017)
  • Y. Ouarda et al.

    Electro-oxidation of secondary effluents from various wastewater plants for the removal of acetaminophen and dissolved organic matter

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • Z. Pi et al.

    Persulfate activation by oxidation biochar supported magnetite particles for tetracycline removal: performance and degradation pathway

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (92)

    • A critical review on current urea removal technologies from water: An approach for pollution prevention and resource recovery

      2023, Separation and Purification Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      They are less susceptible to the radical scavenging effect and have higher redox potential (2.5–3.1 V) [18,181,187,188]. Several AOPs have been studied to remove urea from different water matrixes and to transform them into non-toxic products [18]. A study conducted by Long and co-workers [27] provides a good comparison of UV C and VUV-based AOPs where urea removal efficiency is ranked as VUV/K2S2O8 > UV/K2S2O8 > VUV > VUV/H2O2 > UV/H2O2 > UV≈UV/Na2SO3 (Table 10).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text