Sitemap

Staff Engineers Are Quietly Becoming the New Overhead

Nobody’s getting laid off. Roles are just quietly disappearing from budget spreadsheets. I watched it start.

8 min readApr 8, 2026
Press enter or click to view image in full size
A software engineer working alone at a desk in a high rise office, reflecting the isolation of senior technical roles facing budget scrutiny in 2026.
Photo by TheStandingDesk on Unsplash

I sat in a meeting two weeks ago where our VP of Engineering said something that stuck with me. We were discussing headcount planning for Q3 and someone brought up the cost per engineer across levels.

The VP pulled up a spreadsheet. He didn’t say anything dramatic. He just pointed at the staff engineer column and said “that’s where we need to have a hard conversation.”

Nobody responded. The staff engineers weren’t in the room. But everyone knew what he meant.

I’ve been thinking about that moment ever since. Not because it was surprising. Because it wasn’t. And that’s what made it unsettling.

The math that nobody wants to say out loud

I’m going to share some numbers. They’re not from some industry report. They’re from my own company and from conversations I’ve had with friends at four or five other places over the past couple months.

A staff engineer at our company costs roughly 2.4x what a mid-level engineer costs. Total comp, benefits, all in.

Create an account to read the full story.

Adonis

Written by Adonis

2M+ Views on Medium ✅ | Software Engineering | Scalable & High-Performance Systems | Real-World Software Guides by Engineer @Target Tech, Ex-DRDO

Responses (83)

To respond to this story,
get the free Medium app.

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store

A mid-level engineer with Cursor or Copilot can now produce code that, honestly, looks a lot like what a staff engineer would have written two years ago. Not always. Not for everything....

This insanity has to stop. Claud doesn't have a credible model of whatever it is you are building. Syntax isn't engineering. Claud spent eveything on syntax hence the name Large Language Model. Companies are making slop and don't care anymore. The investors are too easy to trick now.

757

This is a new perspective on who is at risk thanks to AI. Up until now it’s been mainly juniors that people have been saying are at risk. If you are right then staff level too. This implies that in the world of AI, in order to survive you should be…

139

You’re right that the role will be questioned, and that the math doesn’t seem to add up from the outside. Finance doesn’t care about nuance, and honestly, no one outside of engineering does. That’s always been the tension of engineering. Engineers…

138