The Pulsar X2H v3 continues Pulsar's X2 lineup of lightweight wireless gaming mice and is the successor to the Pulsar X2H. It has a similar shape to the Pulsar X2 and the Pulsar X2V2 but with a wider rear end and a taller hump that's further towards the back. Like other Pulsar mice, it has an open baseplate design that exposes the internal components. Pulsar advertises that this shape is ideal for claw grip. Under the hood, it sports optical switches and a Pulsar branded XS-1 sensor that supports a maximum polling rate of 8000Hz with the additional purchase of their 8K Dongle.
Our Verdict
The Pulsar X2H v3 is decent for work use despite not being designed specifically for it. It has excellent build quality, and you can easily remap buttons using the companion software. It connects wirelessly with its USB receiver but doesn't support Bluetooth connectivity or multi-device pairing. Also, its scroll wheel lacks a free-scrolling mode and L/R tilt inputs.
Excellent build quality.
Supportive claw grip optimized shape.
Scroll wheel lacks free scrolling and L/R tilt inputs.
No Bluetooth connectivity or multi-device pairing.
Lightweight bottom plate design means the inside is exposed to dust and debris.
Claw grip optimized shape isn't as comfortable for other grip types.
The Pulsar X2H v3 is an excellent FPS gaming mouse. It has a shape that's optimized for claw grippers, with a tall rear hump that supports your palm and a cinched middle that helps you lock in your grip. It's also remarkably lightweight and has excellent build quality, adding up to a confidence-inspiring in-hand feel. It also delivers amazing raw performance, with impressive sensor latency and superb click latency that delivers a responsive gaming experience.
Excellent raw performance.
Extremely lightweight.
Excellent build quality.
Supportive claw grip optimized shape.
Lightweight bottom plate design means the inside is exposed to dust and debris.
Claw grip optimized shape isn't as comfortable for other grip types.
The Pulsar X2H v3 is a good mouse for MMO gaming. It doesn't have as many additional buttons as a dedicated MMO mouse, but you can still easily reprogram its buttons using the companion software. It also has excellent build quality and outstanding raw performance that delivers an accurate and responsive-feeling gaming experience.
Excellent raw performance.
Excellent build quality.
Supportive claw grip optimized shape.
Lightweight bottom plate design means the inside is exposed to dust and debris.
Claw grip optimized shape isn't as comfortable for other grip types.
The Pulsar X2H v3 has excellent raw performance, with great sensor latency and accuracy and remarkable click latency that help deliver a responsive gaming experience.
Great sensor latency and accuracy.
Superb click latency.
Changelog
- Updated Sep 18, 2025:
We've added a link to the Pulsar TenZ Signature Edition in the Hand Size Recommendation section.
- Updated Aug 19, 2025: We've converted this review to Test Bench 1.5.1. This update removes less relevant or redundant elements, including several videos. We've also adjusted our Sensor Latency testing, resulting in minor score changes. See our full 1.5.1 changelog for details.
- Updated Jul 03, 2025:
We've added a link to the LAMZU Inca in the Hand Size Recommendation section.
- Updated Jan 15, 2025:
We've purchased Pulsar's 8K Dongle separately and performed supplementary testing, adding new results to the Click Latency and Sensor Latency sections.
Check Price
Differences Between Sizes And Variants
The Pulsar X2H v3 is available Black or White. As of late November 2024, it's only available in 'Size 2' (medium).
Here's a photo of our unit's label.
Popular Mouse Comparisons
The Pulsar X2H v3 is the successor to the Pulsar X2H. It uses a Pulsar-branded XS-1 sensor, which supports a maximum polling rate of 1000Hz out of the box or 8000Hz with the additional purchase of Pulsar's 8K Dongle. Otherwise, it has the same shape as its predecessor, the Pulsar X2H. It has a high hump at the rear and a cinched midsection, making it very supportive for claw grip. There are several competing mice that have similar shapes, like the Scyrox V8 and the Ninjutso Sora V2, which are both slightly smaller and lighter and have completely enclosed shells compared to the Pulsar's open-bottomed design. While it still has excellent raw performance, it falls slightly short of the aforementioned competitors and even the Pulsar X2V2.
For more recommendations, see our picks for the best FPS mouse, the best claw grip mouse, and the best lightweight mouse.
The Pulsar X2H v3 and the Pulsar X2V2 are lightweight wireless gaming mice from the same lineup. The X2V2 has a flatter shape that's well suited for all grip types, whereas the X2H v3 has a higher rear hump and a cinched midsection that's optimized specifically for claw grip. The X2V2 has slightly better sensor performance, but it's not noticeable in-game.
The Ninjutso Sora V2 and the Pulsar X2H v3 are wireless gaming mice with similar shapes optimized for claw grip. The Ninjutso is slightly smaller, lighter, and has better sensor performance.
The Scyrox V8 and the Pulsar X2H v3 are lightweight wireless gaming mice. They have similar shapes optimized for claw grip with high rear humps and wide rear ends that narrow at the middle, but the Pulsar (in 'size 2' medium) is bigger and better suited for larger hands. Otherwise, the Scyrox is lighter and has better overall raw performance.
The Pulsar X2H v3 and the Pulsar TenZ Signature Edition are lightweight wireless gaming mice with symmetrical shapes and rearward humps, making them best suited for claw grip. The X2H v3 has a steeper hump that drops off more sharply, giving medium-sized hands a more locked-in feel. The TenZ is slightly taller but marginally narrower, with a more gradual slope that feels more substantial in-hand and works better for a relaxed claw grip with medium- or large-sized hands. Both support wireless polling rates up to 8000Hz, but only the TenZ includes an 8k-capable dongle, while the X2H v3 requires a separate purchase. The TenZ also has a solid baseplate, whereas the X2H v3 uses an open design that leaves the internals more exposed to dust and debris.
Test Results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for pictures & test results
for videos & test results
Comments
Pulsar X2H v3: Main Discussion
Track
Let us know why you want us to review the product here, or encourage others to vote for this product. Comments transferred from merged discussions are also included.
Hi RtingsUser8367028! 😄 You are correct. The 0.7mm is as good as 2mm. The results in the review is 1000 hz with 0.7 mm LOD. We also have the results for 8000hz 4000hz and 1000hz with the 8k receiver. These results were with a LOD of 0.7mm in this picture
Overall, the results of LOD at 2mm was marginally better than 0.7mm but it’s really a matter of preference. Thank you and have a great week! 😄
Hi!
You said that you did tests about the sensor latency on 8000hz and 2ms LOD. At what LOD was the other test done? Do you think the 0.7 mm LOD is pretty much as good as 2mm LOD when thinking about sensor latency?
Update: We’ve added a link to the Pulsar TenZ Signature Edition in the Hand Size Recommendation section.
Did you test with the latest firmware update? The firmware note says it should Optimize latency time and Optimized Sensor data. EDIT: Oops sorry I didn’t read the post below
Update: We’ve purchased Pulsar’s 8K Dongle separately and performed supplementary testing, adding new results to the Click Latency and Sensor Latency sections.
hi keyess01,
We ran some preliminary tests before the holidays on the new firmware and encountered some unusual results that we’re still investigating. We’ve got a small backlog of things to take care of as we reopen here the New Year, but we’ve set aside time next week to update our results for the Pulsar X2H v3. We’ll make another post right here in this thread if there are any more issues.
Sorry about the delay and thank you for your continued patience.
any update about the firmware?
Hello, Thank you for informing us about the firmware update for this mouse. We typically don’t retest products after every firmware update unless the changes are likely to significantly impact our recommendations or influence our readers’ buying decisions. That said, I plan to retest this mouse with the 8k receiver next week and will ensure both the mouse and receiver are updated to the latest firmware beforehand. Stay tuned for the updated results!
Update: We’ve added a link to the review of the Endgame Gear XM2 8k in the Sensor Specifications section.
I think the newest firmware should reduce the motion latency further
Hello, Thanks for your interest in our review and for letting us know about the firmware update. The mouse was tested on firmware version 00.00.10.12 and 4012 for the receiver, as reported by Pulsar Fusion Drive. While we don’t typically retest products for every firmware update, we ensure the firmware is updated if we need to revise the review in the future.
Hello! Pulsar post an updated firmware (XS1_V1.0.1.6-firmware) 11/26/24. Did you guys use this firmware?
The full review has been posted here. Let us know what you think!
Hi ApolloPM, Thanks for your interest in our review! We haven’t had the chance to test the mouse with the additional 8K high-performance receiver yet, but it’s definitely on our to-do list. Testing with higher polling rates often involves additional analysis to ensure accurate and meaningful results, so we want to take the time to do it properly.
The updated results will be released soon after the main review is published. Stay tuned!
Thanks for your patience, and feel free to let us know if you have any other questions in the meantime!