[–] ▶ №3237427[Quote]>>3237474
this is sad and very true
▶ №3237444[Quote]>>3237454
>>3237418 (OP)Wait do you have the statistics
▶ №3237449[Quote]
I need to study this phenomenon for when I invade them so I can stop it
▶ №3237454[Quote]>>3237474
>>3237444I saw one study but I don't have it saved.
But spics themselves (if they're honest) will tell you how rampant that shit is over there.
▶ №3237474[Quote]>>3237545
>>3237427>>3237454Is it really this bad? Tbh it makes a lot of sense bc most Hispanic girls seem unstable like they got abused
▶ №3237479[Quote]
>>3237418 (OP)It's just a saturated edgy meme trope from the late 2010s. Although, i heard that in Indigenous communities or more poverty ridden places, diddybludd incest is more common.
▶ №3237486[Quote]
>>3237418 (OP)RuSSonaZi trvke
total spic death
▶ №3237533[Quote]>>3237707
What is a trvke doe, is the fact that the Latinx internet culture is full of pedos. We had these autistic facebook groups such as SDLG and Legion Holk who shared CP and other illegal stuff and in Spictube there's tons of YT gooners who groomed their minor fans and of course, shared and posted CP with other nonces. Every 2 months there's a new cancellation over some Nonce-phono with a weeb/furry avatar.
▶ №3237542[Quote]>>3237550
Ruzznigger slavshits are the same though
▶ №3237544[Quote]
>>3237418 (OP)>the MAJORITYSnopes saar
▶ №3237545[Quote]
>>3237474one of my family members on my dads side got molested by a uncle
▶ №3237550[Quote]>>3237565
>>3237542Are you spanish?
▶ №3237565[Quote]>>3237611>>3237616>>3237631>>3237639
>>3237550No i'm a british expat im trans btw nyaa~
▶ №3237608[Quote]
do countries like uruguay also have that problem?
▶ №3237631[Quote]
>>3237565More proof ireland won
▶ №3237680[Quote]>>3237693>>3237696>>3237700
Fuck you, i made a detailed answer and you just ignore me. I'm a diagnosed malignant narcissist btw.
▶ №3237693[Quote]>>3237700
>>3237680Im a grandiose narcissist
▶ №3237700[Quote]>>3237709
>>3237693>>3237680I'm surrounded by unironic faggots wtf?
▶ №3237707[Quote]>>3237711
>>3237533and do they ever get stopped or do they continue being pedos?
▶ №3237709[Quote]>>3237716
>>3237700Uk flag but he's a VPNSissy
▶ №3237711[Quote]>>3237723
>>3237707You think putting a pedo on a register stops them from being a pedo?
▶ №3237712[Quote]>>3237718
>>3237696mlp incel sub5 virgin
▶ №3237716[Quote]
>>3237709I'm sorry I'm just paranoid :(
▶ №3237718[Quote]
>>3237712Projecterald, kek
▶ №3237723[Quote]>>3237733
>>3237711in an ideal world, they'd go to jail or get killed
▶ №3237733[Quote]
>>3237723In an ideal world, they'd be killed mercilessly for their crimes against humanity
▶ №3237783[Quote]>>3237808>>3238248
>>3237418 (OP)Yes
>Latinos (44%) were significantly more likely to experience CSA compared to European Americans (27%), and Latinas (54%) had the highest prevalence overall. Other findings indicated substantial differences in type of perpetrator. While female victims of CSA identified male perpetrators in 91.9% of cases, male victims of CSA identified female perpetrators in 52.9% of cases. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0145213409001628 ▶ №3237808[Quote]>>3237828
>>3237783Okay but this in the context of current CSA case numbers, not actual percantages of people who HAVE been abused as a child.
Op said 'the majority' of spics have been abused, and if this is the study then it's BS
▶ №3237828[Quote]>>3237890
>>3237808Erm, the study says over 50% report sexual abuse, what do you mean my furtroon friend?
▶ №3237890[Quote]>>3237965>>3238011
>>3237828You wordeded it poorly so I read the study anyway
>sample size of 223>16-19 year oldsI'm gonna assume this was done in the same school/college campus or whatever. Same local area, same kind of social demographics, location isn't specified.
>self reporting instrumentsTeenagers attention whore, even subconsciously do they attention whore. If someone 'cat called' them they would have thought it necessary to write this down as CSA given the lack of context/explanation for this assessment.
This study didn't even outline what CSA even means so you can interpret this however you want.
OP seems to have thought this meant 54% of the latino women involved in the study were raped by family members, when it could have been as minor as 'cat calling'.
I'm gonna assume OP didn't mean this study specifically, but if he did then this thread was a hell of alot of BS
▶ №3237937[Quote]
>67 references
HAHAHA guys!!! 6 7!!!! LOL
▶ №3237941[Quote]
These niggas scalped 67 research papers just to produce horse shit
▶ №3237965[Quote]>>3238011>>3238015>>3238035
>>3237890Are you genuinely incapable of reading a paper or did you just read the abstract, retard? You're just making things up at this point and you have no good reason to disregard the study, like here you try to attack the authors for some absurd reason
>>3237913<Aryan spaceIf you need me to spoonfeed you how to open a study with sci-hub you can just ask
▶ №3238011[Quote]>>3238031
>>3237890>I'm gonna assume this was done-If you'd read the paper you would have seen the area and selection criterias [wholesomehewrt]
>If someone 'cat called' them they would have thought it necessary to write this down as CSARead the paper, see screenshot here, do you find their diagnotic to be inaccurate?
>>3237965Everything else you said is ad hominem or not relevant and shows that you are desperate to refute the study.
▶ №3238015[Quote]>>3238030>>3238035
>>3237965>like here you try to attack the authorsThats aryan
Are you denying it's biased?
<(1)"One of more of the following criterea"
(2)"Sexual contact between minors"
This basically voids the study because CSA is not CSA if it's two teenagers kissing each other. I guess by legal definition, sure. Anyone could missinterpet this and that would skew the results.
▶ №3238017[Quote]
Shitflinging in an intellectual discussion is a bad look nuswa…
▶ №3238030[Quote]
>>3238015>This basically voids the study because CSA is not CSA if it's two teenagers kissing each other. I guess by legal definition, sure.This is grounds to say the study was politically motivated (keyword, motivated) and not formed around truth.
I will now also assume the 2nd author is a xitter libshit nigger
I do not read/enage with politically motivated [anything] if its not about politics itself. Its faux intellectualism.
▶ №3238031[Quote]>>3238040
>>3238011I'm not reading this
▶ №3238035[Quote]
>>3238015Read the red part here thst I so graciously marked for you my furtroon fren.
>>3237965Does this seem like being "cat called" as you previously claimed?
▶ №3238036[Quote]>>3238050
>shows that you are desperate to refute the study.
I'm not desperate, the results were interesting but not good enough to base the ENTIRETY OF SOUTH AMERICA on.
▶ №3238040[Quote]>>3238046
>>3238031Geg, seething furtroon
▶ №3238046[Quote]>>3238053
>>3238040Shining, glistening projecterald
▶ №3238049[Quote]
Olgol log in
I found you a new boyfriend
▶ №3238054[Quote]>>3238058
>>3238050That doesn't indicate jack shit because you're focussing on race here
If i did the same study in a private boarding school in brazil, would you then apply the results to the entirty of brazil aswell??
No you wouldn't. You can't assume ANYTHING from this study because it SUCKS.
I am not ciritising you nusoi. I'm saying the study itself is retarded
▶ №3238055[Quote]>>3238060>>3238072
>>3238053MEDS olgol is the CUTEST booru foid.
▶ №3238058[Quote]>>3238062>>3238064
>>3238054>Boarding schoolNot representative as most of the south american upper class is crillo, see cremieuxs recent writings on this.
▶ №3238060[Quote]
>>3238055Brachycephalic post.
▶ №3238062[Quote]>>3238063
>>3238058I'm reading some literal who's political sperging about snca for the sake of a a discussion about the quality of a research paper. are you fucking crazy??????
▶ №3238064[Quote]>>3238069>>3238076
>>3238058May i remind you that the socio economic (I KNOW I KNOW, I SAID THE THING) is not spoke about once in the study, when it is actually a very important factor when gauging a group like this
▶ №3238075[Quote]>>3238078>>3238084
The recorded demographics focused on age race and gender and thats it. That doesn't tell you anything about the area or the kinds of families that live here.
Its too tight. Theres not enough information. Heck, theres only 223 participants and it was SELF governed. If someone asked these questions verbally the answers would have most likely been very different
▶ №3238078[Quote]>>3238086
>>3238075Typical furtroon, no arguments, only leakage.
▶ №3238079[Quote]>>3238104
>>3238076I noticed how you deleted the post accusing me of saying that child molestation is 'a-okay' and thats what I'm arguing for here.
Why should I take you seriously when your judgement is so, so poor
▶ №3238081[Quote]
>>3238076We know this already.
▶ №3238084[Quote]>>3238088>>3238134>>3238146
>>3238075Why don't you go have your furry irc ERP goon sesh with @Aryanne or something?
▶ №3238086[Quote]>>3238090
>>3238078I gave you several
▶ №3238088[Quote]>>3238113
>>3238084Are you jealous? lol????????? wtf is this??
▶ №3238104[Quote]>>3238109
>>3238079I literally just rewrote this
>>3238076 but changed "child molestation" to "CSA" and added "or something", a population being poor is not sufficient explaination for them to commit CSA either way which you certainly agree with?
▶ №3238109[Quote]
>>3238104I'm not arguing for the mass rape of latino children you fucking retard
▶ №3238112[Quote]>>3238127
I'm saying the study sucks and you shouldn't attribute it's results to the whole of south america
▶ №3238114[Quote]>>3238118>>3238138
>>3238113Are you gonna pretend like you were baiting this whole time?
▶ №3238116[Quote]
You know, people say 'white people won' but the masses are literally just people like this guy.
▶ №3238122[Quote]>>3238126
>>3238118Oh my science not muh fuggen virtual private network user ohhhhh ohhhh noers oh noperino
▶ №3238127[Quote]>>3238140
>>3238112And I am telling you that you are attacking it on bad grounds, even looking at CSA rates hispanics are markedly overrepresented as was noted here
>>3238076.
<Is it really absurd to interpolate this to the countries from which they came? Does moving to the US make them more or less likely to commit such crimes?
▶ №3238130[Quote]>>3238133
>>3238126@applejack log in
▶ №3238140[Quote]>>3238161
>>3238127Sunk cost falicy. Why are you incapable of admitting this study is terrible
▶ №3238141[Quote]>>3238153>>3238156
>>3238134You are an enemy of Hitler
▶ №3238143[Quote]
(O olgol)
▶ №3238146[Quote]>>3238165>>3238188
>>3238084He can erp with me
>>3238126Stfu mutt
▶ №3238148[Quote]
>>3238138I find it funny how you went for the jugular out of no where and now you're saying that it was bait to cover your leakage
▶ №3238156[Quote]
>>3238141But hitler likes mares
I HAVE PROOF
▶ №3238161[Quote]>>3238167>>3238179>>3238186
>>3238140You are yet to offer any valid refuation of the study and admitted you didn't even read it, just pack it up at this point and go back to your irctrooncord. Not to mention you ignoring everything else, so let me repoast for you:
>And I am telling you that you are attacking it on bad grounds, even looking at CSA rates hispanics are markedly overrepresented as was noted here >>3238076 (You). <>Is it really absurd to interpolate this to the countries from which they came? Does moving to the US make them more or less likely to commit such crimes?Answer both these points
▶ №3238167[Quote]>>3238186>>3238192
>>3238161I gave you several I'm not repeating myself!!
▶ №3238179[Quote]>>3238192
>>3238161I'm not answering these because you're unlikly to listen
Sorry bro but you're not making it to hyperborea.
▶ №3238186[Quote]>>3238195
>>3238167You did not and admitted to not reading the study, you "handviftar" it away when you claimed
>They probably counted cat callingThey didnt which I showed you
>They didnt explain how they collected the answersThey explained this in detail
>Well one of the authors is a feminist and one was a studentNot a refutation of the study, just shows you are throwing shit and hoping it sill stick, also reply to
>>3238161 and picrel
▶ №3238188[Quote]>>3238204
>>3238146quote why did you unban roaches
▶ №3238192[Quote]
>>3238179>>3238167You make extremely bad faith arguments and argue like a woman, respectfully.
▶ №3238195[Quote]>>3238281
>>3238186>They didnt which I showed youYou can't know this for sure.
>They didnt explain how they collected the answersI NEVER said this.
>Well one of the authors is a feminist and one was a studentOne of the authors is a BIASED LIBSHIT MORON, and the other NEVER GRADUATED
▶ №3238204[Quote]
>>3238188I'm housing them they just have a tvrkish flag for some reason
▶ №3238210[Quote]
Nusois are right wing nazis UNLESS ITS A STUDY THEY LIKE THEN THEY MUST SUCK BIG COMMIE COCK LMFAO
▶ №3238212[Quote]
Just shut this fucking board down bro
▶ №3238254[Quote]>>3238302
>>3238248Woah I'm paranoid right now!
Anyway we just had a big discussion about how irrelevant these statistics are because the study itself was abyssmal dogshit and you shouldn't take it seriously
▶ №3238277[Quote]
>>3238225Yeah what a stupid degenerate. Uploading unwholesome pony porn to ru
▶ №3238281[Quote]
>>3238195>You can't know this for sure. Here is the exact diagnostics, which of the three do you disregard as "catcalling"?
>I NEVER said thisYou said, and I @quote
>I'm gonna assume this was done in the same school/college campus or whatever. Same local area, same kind of social demographics, location isn't specified.Which they explicitly described in the method my furtroon friend.
>One of the authors is a BIASED LIBSHIT MORON, and the other NEVER GRADUATEDAd hominem even if that is even true, you are making extreme claims of scientific fraud.
▶ №3238282[Quote]>>3238315
>>3238260I hate people like this yeah but I'm not that angry I guess
▶ №3238300[Quote]>>3238318
>Which they explicitly described in the method my furtroon friend.
They didn't do this
▶ №3238314[Quote]>>3238346
>Ad hominem even if that is even true, you are making extreme claims of scientific fraud.
I never claimed fraud
I blame them of being amateurs
>Your "refutation" has been ignoring crime data showing overrepresentation
I already said 'we already knew this' to the graph you sent
Am i being baited? Is this some crazy elaborate bait or something???
▶ №3238315[Quote]>>3238320
>>3238282>thatso you ARE
seething GEEEG!
▶ №3238318[Quote]>>3238330
>>3238300Please post the scihub link to prove you even read it please, because at this poit because it is
increasingly clear you haven't read it=.
▶ №3238320[Quote]>>3238332
>>3238315Ugh whatever what else are you meant to do on this board anyway?
▶ №3238330[Quote]>>3238339>>3238357
>>3238318Yeah I didn't read it
But here you go, confirming my original points anyway
If my original assumptions were all correct, then is ignoring the study so sinful
▶ №3238332[Quote]>>3238335
>>3238320/pol/iticking geeeeeeg
▶ №3238335[Quote]
>>3238332yeah uhhhhh
What are you fetisihes????
▶ №3238338[Quote]
Fuck is that political enough?????
▶ №3238346[Quote]>>3238356
>>3238314>Claiming someone is an amateurNot a refutation and they used an existing metric to measure the responses, are you claiming that they gave an official response forum and then lied about the data? Your claims are absurd.
>I already said 'we already knew this' to the graph you sentAnd yet your hanged up on this paper, even when I stressed overrepresentation among CSA at large and argued that it was likely that the nations from which they came had similarily accenuated CSA rates.
PACK IT UP BUDDY BOYO ▶ №3238350[Quote]>>3238358
>>3238339I read the post
I read the abstract
I didn't like the abstract so I confirmed the authors credibility (since thats faster than reading an entire research paper about snca)
Everything I assumed at the start was true (minus the catcalling thing)
I guess thats why I'm still here
▶ №3238356[Quote]
>>3238346bro I'm kinda just pissed off that you think this study is valuable
Like I already know south america has a massive branigger pedo problem, but this study is not good evidence of that
▶ №3238362[Quote]>>3238369>>3238375
>>3238357I just told you why I didn't read it
▶ №3238376[Quote]>>3238389>>3238392
>>3238369Idk I'm having fun
I still think the study was fucking dog shit
This is my point i have no other points, I will continue to argue this point
>YOU DIDNT EVEN READ ITBECUASE IT SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKS
▶ №3238384[Quote]>>3238394
>>3238380Can't quote correctly award
▶ №3238392[Quote]>>3238397
>>3238376geeeeegggg I am going to a different fred lmao
▶ №3238397[Quote]>>3238403
>>3238392I didn't invite you here stop harassing me!
▶ №3238401[Quote]>>3238407
geg why are you nerds reading studies made by kike niggers
▶ №3238407[Quote]
>>3238401I'm not thats the fucking point here!!!
▶ №3238408[Quote]>>3238420
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHQHAHAHAHAHA DO IRCCLITTIES REALLY
▶ №3238411[Quote]>>3238417>>3238423
>>3238403STOP LAUGHING AT ME YOU FUCKING NIGGER
▶ №3238415[Quote]>>3238420
OHNONONONOOOOO AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA GEEEEEEEEEEEEG
▶ №3238429[Quote]>>3238434>>3238458
>>3238423who are you !!!!!!!
▶ №3238434[Quote]>>3238445
>>3238429Im laughing at you,that's who I am heh
▶ №3238437[Quote]
OHNONONONO IRCCLITTIES ETERNALLY BTFO'D HOW WILL THEY EVER RECOVER
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
▶ №3238459[Quote]>>3238460>>3238461>>3238462>>3238466>>3238469
>>3238452They're saying I'M laughing
I'M LAUGHING!!!
I'M NOT LAUGHING. I AM INCREDIBLY SERIOUS.
▶ №3238462[Quote]>>3238468>>3238470
>>3238459Geg you have the typing mannerisms of a troon
▶ №3238465[Quote]
>>3238458There was a schizophrenic kazakh guy in before this guy (unless its the same person)
I just haven't been here in a while o algo
▶ №3238466[Quote]>>3238472
>>3238459JUST GO BACK TO YOUR IRCCORD GEEEEEEG
▶ №3238468[Quote]
>>3238462Projecterald
You're a fuckin troon stfu
▶ №3238470[Quote]
>>3238462Hes clearly baiting
▶ №3238472[Quote]>>3238478>>3238494
>>3238466We're talking about ponies in irc cord and YOU'RE NOT INVITED
▶ №3238555[Quote]
>>3238537Oh I see the reply above my bad
▶ №3238556[Quote]
@retardcel get back in here cord nigger
You can't call me a cord user and then prove that you regular the IRC
▶ №3238562[Quote]>>3238653
>>3238559YOU ARE IN HERE DAILY
▶ №3238672[Quote]>>3238679>>3238681>>3238682>>3238697
>>3238671hmm i wonder why eveyone bullies him
