News Article

Ex-CIA Director: ‘25th Amendment Was Written With Donald Trump in Mind’

Steve Mollman
By

Weekend Editor

to see more of our trusted coverage when you search.

Former CIA Director John Brennan said President Donald Trump’s recent statements and actions related to the Iran war raise serious questions about his fitness to remain commander in chief, arguing that the Constitution’s 25th Amendment was designed for situations like this.

Brennan, appearing on MS Now on Saturday, criticized Trump’s rhetoric on Iran and the war’s consequences. He warned that the president’s conduct—paired with his control over U.S. military and nuclear capabilities—represents a dangerous convergence of power and instability.

Calls to invoke the 25th Amendment against Trump have intensified following his threats toward Iran and comments suggesting the destruction of an entire civilization, setting off renewed debate over presidential authority and accountability during wartime.

Newsweek reached out to the White House on Saturday.

Why It Matters

The 25th Amendment was adopted to address presidential incapacity, but it has rarely been discussed in the context of a sitting president’s conduct during an active military conflict. Brennan’s argument reframes the amendment not as a tool of last‑resort succession planning, but as a safeguard against what he views as reckless command authority.

The debate has taken on added urgency as the U.S. confronts escalating regional instability in the Middle East, with Brennan citing reports of U.S. service members killed amid the fighting and diplomatic efforts underway to contain the conflict.

While Democrats have led many of the calls to invoke the amendment, some Republicans and conservative commentators have also raised concerns, contributing to an unusual cross‑party discussion about the limits of executive power in moments of crisis.

What to Know

Brennan served as CIA director from 2013 to 2017 under President Barack Obama, following more than 30 years in intelligence and national security roles, including as Obama’s chief counterterrorism adviser.

Brennan pointed to Trump’s comments on Tuesday threatening to eliminate "a whole civilization,” saying such language underscored the danger of unchecked executive power. “Allowing someone like this to continue to be the commander in chief and to control the tremendous capabilities of the U.S. military, including our nuclear weapons capability…we really are in very, very troubling times,” he said.

The former CIA director went further, saying that Trump "clearly is unhinged” and arguing that the 25th Amendment was effectively written with a leader like Trump in mind. Brennan warned that allowing such a president to continue as commander in chief posed extraordinary risks, particularly given Trump’s authority over nuclear weapons.

Brennan said it was especially troubling that Trump has continued to act with the backing of members of his party who, in Brennan’s view, have worked to excuse or rationalize his conduct rather than challenge it.

“The fact that he’s able to do that, and members of his party and his MAGA base continue to explain and apologize for and rationalize what he’s doing, is just so, so troubling,” Brennan said.

Former Director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) John Brennan testifies before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Ca... | Drew Angerer/Getty Images

In recent days, a growing number of elected officials and political figures have publicly raised the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment, citing concerns about President Trump’s conduct and rhetoric during the Iran conflict. Several Democratic lawmakers, including Representatives Shri Thanedar of Michigan and Ro Khanna of California, called on Vice President JD Vance and the Cabinet to act following Trump’s social media posts threatening large‑scale destruction in Iran. Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts made similar arguments in statements shared on social media and in television interviews this week, warning that the president’s language amounted to a national security risk.

Some Trump allies and conservative figures have echoed those concerns. Former Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, once a close Trump supporter, publicly called for invoking the 25th Amendment on April 5 in a post responding to the president’s Iran rhetoric. Other right‑leaning commentators, including media personality Alex Jones, have made similar arguments in broadcasts and online posts, saying the amendment exists as a constitutional safeguard when a president is viewed as unable to safely discharge the powers of the office.

Invoking the amendment remains procedurally and politically difficult. Under Section 4, the vice president and a majority of the cabinet would need to declare Trump unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office—a step that has never been completed against a sitting president.

Brennan, while sharply critical of Trump, expressed cautious optimism about the current diplomatic track, noting reports that Vance was bringing “some government professionals and experts” with him to the U.S.-Iran talks in Islamabad, Pakistan, this weekend aimed at de‑escalation.

What Happens Next

U.S. and Iranian officials are expected to continue talks in the coming days as they attempt to stabilize a fragile ceasefire and prevent further escalation of the conflict.

Is This Article Fair?

Select an option to vote. You can change it anytime.

Domestically, pressure on the White House is likely to persist, with additional lawmakers expected to weigh in on whether the 25th Amendment should be formally considered. So far, there has been no indication that Vance or Trump’s cabinet intends to pursue that path, but the debate shows no signs of fading as the conflict—and scrutiny of presidential authority—continues.

In a polarized era, the center is dismissed as bland. At Newsweek, ours is different: The Courageous Center—it's not "both sides," it's sharp, challenging and alive with ideas. We follow facts, not factions. If that sounds like the kind of journalism you want to see thrive, we need you.

When you become a Newsweek Member, you support a mission to keep the center strong and vibrant. Members enjoy: Ad-free browsing, exclusive content and editor conversations. Help keep the center courageous. Join today.

In a polarized era, the center is dismissed as bland. At Newsweek, ours is different: The Courageous Center—it's not "both sides," it's sharp, challenging and alive with ideas. We follow facts, not factions. If that sounds like the kind of journalism you want to see thrive, we need you.

When you become a Newsweek Member, you support a mission to keep the center strong and vibrant. Members enjoy: Ad-free browsing, exclusive content and editor conversations. Help keep the center courageous. Join today.

Newsweek’s reporters and editors used Martyn, our AI assistant, to help produce this story. Learn more about Martyn.
to see more of our trusted coverage when you search.

Conversation

|

Start a discussion, not a fire. Post with kindness. Read our guidelines here

All Comments

    1. Comment by alan_koppenst.

      Member

      Republican members in both houses aren't strong enough or willing to invoke the 25th or even suggest the impeachment of Trump.

      He has them so scared of themselves and he knows just talking bad about them will keep them in line and him doing whatever he wants without any consequences.

      • Reply by Bluhorizons1.

        That is truly absurd. How would enacting the 25th Amendment or indeed impeachment and removal from office of the president be considered overthrow of the government?

      • Reply by kaintucki.

        Member

        "...afraid of the consequences of aiding an overthrow..."

        All of them are aware of what's happening; some of them disapprove; some are actually fearful, and some of those for the wrong reason. I'm convinced that some (Specifically, JOHNSON and his gang of reactionaries.) are in on TRAMP's attempt to overthrow the United States Government, which explains better than anything the MAGs' refusal to reign in their ring-leader: TRAMP.

    2. Comment by Dgpdgp.

      I agree that DJT fits the reason for this amendment perfectly. What the writers of this amendment did not foresee is a Cabinet lacking in loyalty to the USA and failing to have any integrity or backbone.

      • Reply by Bluhorizons1.

        I take it you do not know how the 25th works. It was intended to let the VP act as president temporarily in case a president was incapacitated. If the president objects and appeals, it will then take a super majority of both houses to do remove him. What are the chances that both houses can get that kind of majority?

    3. Comment by keepingitreal.

      The longer a cancerous growth is ignored, the more certain the patient is doomed.

      In this case, Trump is the cancerous growth and the country is the patient.

      MAGAs....this isn't going to get better through 'thoughts & prayers'.

      • Reply by alan_koppenst.

        Member

        MAGA have their Trump approved bible with his picture on the inside cover. Most likely have an alter with a miniature Trump figure, and pray to daily and make offerings of his favorite happy meal praying for him to bring back the Golden Age of America like he promised them.

    4. Comment by Sleestak.

      the 14th was also in place to prevent anyone who has taken part in an insurrection or rebellion from running for president- but that did not stop them. laws, rules and regulations are only as good as the people who enforce them - so if you have a corrupt SC,congress and military, none of those things will work-- we are living through that right now....hoping a miracle will happen and the mdterms will indeed fix this, but i do not think donnie and this crew are going to allow those elections to happen or if they do they will be putin style elections with 90% "voting" for orangey's hen ch men

      • Reply by Bluhorizons1.

        The Supreme Court ruled that only Congress can determine eligibility for federal office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, allowing Donald Trump to remain on the ballot despite challenges related to the January 6 insurrection

    5. Comment by krusty867.

      Member

      It should of been called The 25th Amendment The DJT account

      • Comment by IronLedger.

        Obviously, the ruling class wants Trump gone. He has gutted their gravy train, such as USAID, and he is not taking orders from them, unlike all the previous presidents.

        • Reply by IronLedger.

          I have already given you the proof

        • Reply by Quickdrawmcgraw.

          Member

          You've given zero proof because you can't. Meanwhile, Donnie grifts billions and you don't care.

      • Comment by Kaleun.

        So you want to tell me that Orange Julius is no stable genius? I am soooo disappoined!

        • Comment by Pat.

          Member

          If trump was removed from office or died, we still have vance. He would be just as bad if not worse than trump.

          • Comment by oakiewilson.

            Member

            When one thinks of an appropriate subject to invoke the 25th Amendment, I don't believe that Trump immediately comes to mind.

            Brennan never publicly commented on another President's mental fitness to serve.

            https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BWUmZRCluT8

            • Comment by oakiewilson.

              Member

              Brennan has a history of "misstatements" about Trump.

              He led the charge of "Russian Collusion" on CNN for two years. Later he explained. ""I don't know if I received bad information, but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was."

              He categorized the Hunter Biden Laptop as having, ""has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation".

              He lied to Congress, according to The Guardian (no friend of Trump). Then was forced to apologize.

              Bottom line, he has credibility problems. His allegations should not be taken at face value.

              Related Podcasts

              Top Stories