Close Menu
ConvictionConviction
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

High Court in Thohoyandou sets aside protection order case after interim order lapses

March 16, 2026

Judge warns body corporate levy lawsuits may be abuse of court process

March 16, 2026

South African Muslim marriages covered by Divorce Act, even after talaq

March 16, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trending
  • High Court in Thohoyandou sets aside protection order case after interim order lapses
  • Judge warns body corporate levy lawsuits may be abuse of court process
  • South African Muslim marriages covered by Divorce Act, even after talaq
  • Deaf student challenges university’s refusal to provide SA Sign Language interpretation
  • Legal Resources Centre tells SAHRC hunger crisis stems from exclusion, not food scarcity
  • Three reasons to steer clear of highly risky illegal offshore online gambling
  • #1 rated online school in South Africa? Advertising board says not so fast
  • Children come first! South African law is clear about parental responsibilities and maintenance
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
ConvictionConviction
Demo
  • Home
  • Law & Justice
  • Special Reports
  • Opinion
  • Ask The Expert
  • Get In Touch
ConvictionConviction
Home » Law expert Ashwini Singh provides insights on claiming costs from a body corporate
Ask The Expert

Law expert Ashwini Singh provides insights on claiming costs from a body corporate

Legal remedies for owners facing financial losses due to body corporate negligence
Conviction ExpertBy Conviction ExpertMay 19, 20251 Comment
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
Ashwini Singh, a law academic and affiliate of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, South Africa. Picture: Supplied
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Dear Conviction, 

If a body corporate incurs damages of a financial nature, can I claim the costs from them? As in, if I must take the body corporate to court over their failure to follow their own rules and it is costing me money. 

Ashwini Singh provides the following insight:  

It really comes down to what the costs were. Before approaching a court, it is important to consult the Community Schemes Ombud Service to find out whether the issue falls within their ambit of adjudication.  

If it does, then it is almost always compulsory to engage them prior to any court litigation as that would be financially prudent. Most contraventions of the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act 8 of 2011 can be dealt with via the Community Schemes Ombud Service. 

If it is a dispute that falls within the jurisdiction of a court, such as a declaratory order or a delictual claim, then that matter would have to be placed before a court (not an ombud). And with court, comes costs in the form of attorney’s fees, appearance fees, counsel fees, etcetera. Court costs easily pile up, and when a body corporate is involved, parties resort to delay tactics and such to increase the likelihood of a case being withdrawn by the other party based on financial hardship.  

However, there is one source of consolation: a cost order. Whether by consent or judgment, costs awarded by the court must be complied with by the party who is ordered to pay. If a party refuses to pay the costs they are ordered to pay, then they will be pursued for the debt in the same manner as a creditor would pursue a debtor.  

I was made aware of a recent case in Durban where a body corporate of a sectional title scheme in Westridge had agreed to pay an owner Scale B costs via a High Court Consent Order. When the owner’s attorney sent the Westridge body corporate his Scale B costs, the body corporate suddenly refused to pay. 

The matter was set down with the Taxing Master of the High Court, resulting in the Westridge body corporate being ordered to pay R 61,000 in costs to the owner. Once an amount is finalised by a Taxing Master, that amount must be paid otherwise the defaulting party can be liable for debt collection or attachment of property.  

In essence, if an owner has no choice but to take a body corporate to court, then it must be a legitimate issue where costs can be rewarded to mitigate any financial damages caused by the body corporate (who cannot evade payment of these costs). 

Singh is a law academic and an affiliate of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, South Africa.  

#Conviction 

Get your news on the go. Click here to follow the Conviction WhatsApp channel 

Body corporate community schemes ombud service cost recovery court orders debt collection governance disputes legal claims legal fees levy enforcement Property law sectional title disputes Taxing Master rulings
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
Conviction Expert

    Justice explained. Rights unlocked. Answers you can trust.

    Related Posts

    Judge warns body corporate levy lawsuits may be abuse of court process

    March 16, 2026

    Legal déjà vu as Tyger Lake repeats Rosebank Mall’s zoning woes a decade later

    March 12, 2026

    Body corporate failed to act as family endured sewer smells and cockroach infestation

    March 6, 2026

    1 Comment

    1. Pablo Ellis on May 31, 2025 6:30 pm

      Its hectic what body corporates do to bully!! The bad part is everyone pays for the incompetence of trustees.

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Prove your humanity: 8   +   5   =  

    Subscribe to our newsletter:
    Top Posts

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024

    Irregular levy increases, mismanagement, and legal threats in a sectional title scheme

    June 2, 2025
    Don't Miss
    Civil Law
    4 Mins Read

    High Court in Thohoyandou sets aside protection order case after interim order lapses

    By Kennedy MudzuliMarch 16, 20264 Mins Read

    The High Court in Thohoyandou has set aside protection order proceedings after finding that a magistrate failed to extend an interim protection order when the complainant missed a court date, causing the order to lapse.

    Judge warns body corporate levy lawsuits may be abuse of court process

    March 16, 2026

    South African Muslim marriages covered by Divorce Act, even after talaq

    March 16, 2026

    Deaf student challenges university’s refusal to provide SA Sign Language interpretation

    March 16, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • WhatsApp
    Demo
    About Us
    About Us

    Helping South Africans to navigate the legal landscape; providing accessible legal information; and giving a voice to those seeking justice.

    Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp
    Our Picks

    High Court in Thohoyandou sets aside protection order case after interim order lapses

    March 16, 2026

    Judge warns body corporate levy lawsuits may be abuse of court process

    March 16, 2026

    South African Muslim marriages covered by Divorce Act, even after talaq

    March 16, 2026
    Most Popular

    Making sectional title rules that work: A practical guide

    January 17, 2025

    Protection order among the consequences of trespassing in an ‘Exclusive Use Area’

    December 31, 2024

    Between a rock and a foul-smelling place

    November 27, 2024
    © 2026 Conviction.
    • Home
    • Law & Justice
    • Special Reports
    • Opinion
    • Ask The Expert
    • Get In Touch

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.